Hi,
Thanks to Mr. Andrey V. Elsukov's advice, I could RESOLVE
the problem (trouble) mentioned originally at
* URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2012-July/005345.html
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:46:58 +0900
Message-ID: <20120723134658.153fa6c%mur1080...@inter7.jp>
To:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:28:23 +0200
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:21:35AM -0500, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> > On 07/22/2012 05:05 PM, RW wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any good reason for preferring XTS over CBC in geli? I
> > > just did some tests on a new disk and CBC seems
On 24.07.2012 19:18, Norihiko Murase wrote:
> does have 2 slices (FDISK partitions) as follows:
> (1) sysid 165=0xA5 (FreeBSD)
> flag 80 (active)
> start 63, size 14801409 (7227 MB)
> BSD partitions: a, b, c, e, f, g
> - 'a' is for "root" of the 4.11-RELEASE system.
>
Dear Mr. Andrey V. Elsukov,
Thank you very much for your comment.
> if i understand correctly, you have bsdlabel's metadata just after MBR,
> and it overlaps MBR (maybe you have configured dangerous dedicated disk?).
Hmm
I would like to ask several questions about the "dangerous
dedicated
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:21:35AM -0500, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> On 07/22/2012 05:05 PM, RW wrote:
> >
> > Is there any good reason for preferring XTS over CBC in geli? I just did
> > some tests on a new disk and CBC seems to be about 30% faster.
>
> This depends on how the initialization vect
On 07/22/2012 05:05 PM, RW wrote:
>
> Is there any good reason for preferring XTS over CBC in geli? I just did
> some tests on a new disk and CBC seems to be about 30% faster.
This depends on how the initialization vectors are generated for CBC. If
guessable IVs are used, such as with plain secto
on 23/07/2012 16:42 Alexander Motin said the following:
> Patch can be found here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/mediachange8.patch
>
> Any comments/objections/propositions?
Alexander,
would it make sense for scsi_cd to also use GET EVENT STATUS NOTIFICATION
command (4A) with Polled flag and
