Those of us who were ever going to willingly switch off the
direct line of descent from Netscape would have done so a
long time ago...the removal of Seamonkey from the ports tree
has left an irate rump without a way to upgrade.
I have some old copies of the ports tree...what would be
involved i
>From a ports collection Portsnap Fetched today,
I tried to make-install Seamonkey 2.0.4 under FreeBSD 7.3
(which shipped with a Seamonkey 2.0.3 port which generated
security warnings on attempting to install it).
It ran into an error,
"error: `SSL_RENEGOTIATE_REQUIRES_XTN' was not declared in th
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> On 06/01/10 02:23, Louis Epstein wrote:
> >
> >>From a ports collection Portsnap Fetched today,
> > I tried to make-install Seamonkey 2.0.4 under FreeBSD 7.3
> > (which shipped with a Seamonkey 2.0.3 port which gene
Why is the current revision of the Seamonkey port "2.23.2" rather than
2.24 (which Seamonkey sent me an automatic reminder that I needed)?
Currently it is not working for me because the file libcairo.so.2 is
desired by libxul.so and not found,so it can't load XPCOM (according
to the error message
The port still looks for 2.23.2 rather than 2.24 (which,along with
2.25 Beta 1,is what is available at the seamonkey-project.org site).
Trying to upgrade it with Portmaster generates error messages
1)complaining that the port asks for gtk20 which does not exist,
2)listing Mozilla bulletins on vuln
After a prolonged development pause,Seamonkey 2.35 and 2.38 were
released this month,but neither has shown up in the Ports Collection.
When will an update of Seamonkey be available,considering that
2.33 has such outstanding issues that the last port upgrades
failed and I had to redo it with pkg?
While /usr/ports/UPDATING mentioned a seamonkey 2.38 port on October 6th
the port itself doesn't seem to exist yet!
When's it coming?
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
___
freebs
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 23:59, Louis Epstein wrote:
> >
> > While /usr/ports/UPDATING mentioned a seamonkey 2.38 port on October 6th
> > the port itself doesn't seem to exist yet!
> >
> > When's it coming?
>
> I h
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Steve Wills wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2015 23:38, Louis Epstein wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Steve Wills wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/02/2015 23:59, Louis Epstein wrote:
> >>>
> >>> While /usr/ports/UPDATING mentioned a
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 01:11, Louis Epstein wrote:
> >
> > I update my ports tree several times a day.
> >
>
> Then you should be good.
>
> >> 2. Apply the patch using the patch command.
> >
> > Have n
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 21:00, Louis Epstein wrote:
> > The download was prompted to name it seamonkey.diff.gz
> > so does it need to be gunzipped?
>
> Perhaps, not sure. Try gzip -d and if it works, great. :) If not, use
> file or less to
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
> Jan Beich wrote:
> > So, try building with USE_MOZILLA=-opus again after
> >
> >$ sed 's,^[-+]\{3\} ,&mozilla/,' \
> > ../firefox/files/patch-z-bug517422 \
> > >files/patch-z-bug517422
> I have successfully build seamonkey with this pa
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Jan Beich wrote:
> "Marat N.Afanasyev" writes:
>
> > Jan Beich wrote:
> >
> >> So, try building with USE_MOZILLA=-opus again after
> >>
> >>$ sed 's,^[-+]\{3\} ,&mozilla/,' \
> >> ../firefox/files/patch-z-bug517422 \
> >> >files/patch-z-bug517422
> > I have suc
Today I updated Seamonkey to 2.33.1_9 via pkg
(which failed via portmaster),which also entailed
reinstalling 15 other packages.
When will a newer version of Seamonkey be in a
port that installs let alone a package?
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
> Louis Epstein wrote:
> > Today I updated Seamonkey to 2.33.1_9 via pkg
> > (which failed via portmaster),which also entailed
> > reinstalling 15 other packages.
> >
> > When will a newer version of Seamonkey be in a
We are once again seeing a new revision of the Seamonkey port
(2.39_3)
refuse to install via Portmaster because of known vulnerabilities
(which presumably affect the older version as well).
I suppose I'll have to wait for pkg to catch up to run the
update?
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUS
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jan Beich wrote:
> Louis Epstein writes:
>
> > We are once again seeing a new revision of the Seamonkey port
> > (2.39_3)
> > refuse to install via Portmaster because of known vulnerabilities
> > (which presumably affect the older version as
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jan Beich wrote:
> Louis Epstein writes:
>
> > We are once again seeing a new revision of the Seamonkey port
> > (2.39_3)
> > refuse to install via Portmaster because of known vulnerabilities
> > (which presumably affect the older version as
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jan Beich wrote:
> Louis Epstein writes:
>
> > We are once again seeing a new revision of the Seamonkey port
> > (2.39_3)
> > refuse to install via Portmaster because of known vulnerabilities
> > (which presumably affect the older version as
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016, Jan Beich wrote:
> Louis Epstein writes:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jan Beich wrote:
> >
> >> Louis Epstein writes:
> >>
> >> > We are once again seeing a new revision of the Seamonkey port
> >> > (2.39
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016, Jan Beich wrote:
> Louis Epstein writes:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Jan Beich wrote:
> >
> >> Louis Epstein writes:
> >>
> >> > We are once again seeing a new revision of the Seamonkey port
> >> > (2.39
A new patch for seamonkey2.39 was in this morning's ports,
along with one for firefox and some associated files...this
despite 2.40 being the current seamonkey for months.
As ever seamonkey crashed portmaster rather than complete
so I am prepared to wait for pkg.
However,the associated files that
I see yet another patch of seamonkey 2.39 has uploaded,months after 2.40
was released...but now that icu has updated to version 57 Seamonkey's
libxul.so generates error messages because it searches for
/usr/local/lib/libicu*
files that specify version 55 that are no longer there.
I've made symboli
23 matches
Mail list logo
