Howdy,
On to the next victim. :) In my ongoing campaign to build my ports with
gcc 4.5.1 thunderbird was the next to fall. Full log is at
http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/tbird.txt
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerh
Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux
version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd like to run the
native version and get out of "clunky font land" sometime soon. :) Do
y'all have a roadmap? If I missed it, my apologies ...
Doug
--
Improve
On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux
version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd like to run the
native version and ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/04/10 08:12, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>>> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
>&
ale? ping? Would it help if Beat or I committed this for you?
Doug
On 08/04/2010 23:12, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/04/10 08:12, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>> On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>>>> On 8/3/10 3:05 A
On 08/19/2011 09:12, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 19/08/2011 18:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> OK, it seems that the culprit is mozilla/toolkit/xre/glxtest.cpp:
>> fire_glxtest_process() forks a new process, but doesn't wait(2) for it.
>> So when wait(2) is invoked later it may return a pid of
On 08/22/2011 02:49, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton ha scritto:
>> Thanks for doing all the detective work on this. :)
>
> Thanks also by me.
>
>> Your patch gets
>> things to a (mostly) functional state. The one thing that's still odd is
>> that I can
On 08/22/2011 22:40, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton ha scritto:
>> I was using 1.3.
>
> Recompiled with avg's patch or not?
Without the patch I had the problems I described in my first post. With
the patch things work ok except for closing the preferences dialog.
--
On 08/23/2011 00:21, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton ha scritto:
>>>> I was using 1.3.
>>>
>>> Recompiled with avg's patch or not?
>>
>> Without the patch I had the problems I described in my first post. With
>> the patch things work ok exc
Howdy,
According to the latest portaudit database the following ports are
currently vulnerable. You maintain one or more of these ports. Please
consider one of the following courses of action:
1. Removing the port
2. Fixing the port
3. Allowing it to be returned to the po...@freebsd.org maintaine
Howdy,
Y'all have marked www/seamonkey2 to expire on the 1st of this month, but
it hasn't been deleted yet. I am currently trolling the tree to find
stuff owned by ports@ that is in this boat so I can delete them, and
came across this so I thought I'd mention it.
The only relevant entries I found
On 10/08/2011 22:38, Beat Gätzi wrote:
> We are aware of those ports. Flo and I were discussion the deleting of those
> ports at the EuroBSDCon DevSummit. There is a little work to do prior to the
> deletion of them. We will do that once this work is done.
Excellent, sounds like y'all have it well
Looking through the X11BASE stuff I noticed the following similar
patches for mail/thunderbird, mail/thunderbird-esr, and www/seamonkey:
-MOZ_FIX_LINK_PATHS='-Wl,-rpath-link,$(LIBXUL_DIST)/bin
-Wl,-rpath-link,$(prefix)/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,$(if
$(X11BASE),$(X11BASE),/usr/X11R6)/lib'
+MOZ_FI
First let me say a big thank you to the gecko@ team. It's obvious that
the latest round of updates includes an enormous amount of work, and
both the thunderbird build and the firefox PGO build went flawlessly.
I've been using the new firefox and it is great so far. :)
The problem comes in with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/28/2012 11:47, Florian Smeets wrote:
> This is the patch i intend to commit.
Worked perfectly on 8-i386 and 10-amd64, thanks! :)
Doug
- --
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will no
On 8/23/2012 4:27 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> FYI, I would like your approval on these (just the commit of BROKEN; I
> do not expect you to try to fix them).
I'm confused. Since when does portmgr need the approval of a maintainer
to tag something BROKEN?
--
I am only one, but I am one. I can
16 matches
Mail list logo
