maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 255359] www/firefox fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-gecko (Nobody) for maintainer-feedback: Bug 255359: www/firefox fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Description --- <...> readonly align 4 dereferenceable(12) %2939) #26, !noalia

[Bug 255359] www/firefox fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 Bug ID: 255359 Summary: www/firefox fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: An

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@freebsd.org Keyword

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #1 from Dimitry Andric --- >From the stack trace, it looks like this is using the devel/llvm12 port? I'm adding Brooks on CC, because if any fix is identified, it will have to be added to that port. -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #2 from jakub_l...@mailplus.pl --- Yes, it's using llvm12 package (autoinstalled as a build dependency). FWIW, I just have completed firefox built without LTO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for t

[Bug 255193] www/firefox: fails to build with llvm error

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255193 --- Comment #5 from Jan Beich --- I can't reproduce with -march=native (on Skylake) alone. It seems the error is caused by -flto=thin i.e., OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=LTO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. __

[Bug 255379] www/firefox: dumps core with "too much recurson" if PIE ASLR is enabled

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255379 Bug ID: 255379 Summary: www/firefox: dumps core with "too much recurson" if PIE ASLR is enabled Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 255379] www/firefox: dumps core with "too much recurson" if PIE ASLR is enabled

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-gecko (Nobody) for maintainer-feedback: Bug 255379: www/firefox: dumps core with "too much recurson" if PIE ASLR is enabled https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255379 ___ freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mail

[Bug 255379] www/firefox: dumps core with "too much recurson" if PIE ASLR is enabled

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255379 Rajeev Pillai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rajeev_v_pil...@yahoo.com --- Comm

[Bug 255359] www/firefox: Fails to build with LTO enabled after recent update: LLVM ERROR: Broken module found

2021-04-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255359 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beich --- Cross-language LTO likely requires Clang and rustc to use the same LLVM version. lang/rust at 1.51.0 bundles LLVM 11.0.1, so to use LTO add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=11 to /etc/make.conf or www/firefox/Makefil