Problem reports for ge...@freebsd.org that need special attention

2019-06-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Mikhail T.
Gentlemen, do you realize, building Firefox on FreeBSD today one has to wait for the entire LLVM to be recompiled -- /twice/: once because gecko, inexplicably, wants LLVM itself, and also because rust builds its own bundled version... What's wrong with the binaries provided by the base OS?.. Y

Re: Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Jan Beich
"Mikhail T." writes: > Gentlemen, do you realize, building Firefox on FreeBSD today one has > to wait for the entire LLVM to be recompiled -- /twice/: once because > gecko, inexplicably, wants LLVM itself, and also because rust builds > its own bundled version... > > What's wrong with the binarie

Re: Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Mikhail T.
On 16.06.19 21:31, Jan Beich wrote: "Mikhail T." writes: Gentlemen, do you realize, building Firefox on FreeBSD today one has to wait for the entire LLVM to be recompiled -- /twice/: once because gecko, inexplicably, wants LLVM itself, and also because rust builds its own bundled version... W

Re: Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Jan Beich
"Mikhail T." writes: > On 16.06.19 21:31, Jan Beich wrote: > >> "Mikhail T." writes: >> >>> Gentlemen, do you realize, building Firefox on FreeBSD today one has >>> to wait for the entire LLVM to be recompiled -- /twice/: once because >>> gecko, inexplicably, wants LLVM itself, and also because

Re: Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Mikhail T.
On 16.06.19 22:25, Jan Beich wrote: clang-sys didn't support llvm80 when gecko@ switched to it. I'm not sure myself why but maybe bindgen uses a subset of bindings that're stable Perhaps, this is something the port's maintainers should research? Along with the possibility of switching lang/rus

Re: Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Charlie Li via freebsd-gecko
Mikhail T. wrote: > Perhaps, this is something the port's maintainers should research? Along > with the possibility of switching lang/rust back to the llvm provided by > the base (best) or installed by a port (second best)? > Rust will not revert back to providing an option to use an external LLVM

Re: Firefox and llvm

2019-06-16 Thread Jan Beich
"Mikhail T." writes: > On 16.06.19 22:25, Jan Beich wrote: > >> clang-sys didn't support llvm80 when gecko@ switched to it. I'm not >> sure myself why but maybe bindgen uses a subset of bindings that're >> stable > > Perhaps, this is something the port's maintainers should research? If bindgen w

[Bug 238639] devel/gn: maybe unusable by www/firefox

2019-06-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238639 Bug ID: 238639 Summary: devel/gn: maybe unusable by www/firefox Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords