Hi I create update patch.
When I wrote patch I read that:
If there is no pending PR, the next step is to send an email to the
port's maintainer, as shown by make maintainer. That person may already
be working on an upgrade, or have a reason to not upgrade the port right
now (because of, for examp
On 01.02.12 22:27, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> The following patch seems to be required to build libxul-1.9.2.26 with gcc
> 4.6.X:
> --- gfx/ots/src/os2.cc.orig 2012-02-01 23:05:19.933087647 +0200
> +++ gfx/ots/src/os2.cc2012-02-01 23:09:48.507582408 +0200
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
> // Use of thi
On 02.02.2012 05:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Since the upgrade to firefox 10, it crashes when try to access the
> puzzles at http://www/jigsawplanet.com. The puzzles are java and
> worked fine under Firefox 9. The only other thing I normally run that
> is in Java is the ICSI netalyzr, and it runs fi
Hi,
yes, the PGO build is broken, we know. As beat and i obviously don't use
PGO I'm seriously considering removing the option. It causes nothing but
pain after every upgrade. Nobody tests the betas, but people complain
when the releases are broken. Patches are welcome...
Florian
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.0/config/nsinstall
-R -m 644 /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/media/libjpeg/jconfig.h
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/media/libjpeg/jerror.h
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/media/libjpeg/ji
# $FreeBSD: ports/www/firefox/Makefile,v 1.261 2012/02/01 09:49:58 flo
Exp $ #
PORTNAME= firefox
DISTVERSION=10.0
PORTEPOCH= 1
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.0/config/nsinstall
-R -m 644 /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/media/l
