Re: VirtualBox 4.3.6 keyboard repeats keystrokes

made installing an ubuntu guest on a freebsd host impossible. Exporting an xterm over the same connection and keyboard repeat is normal. The effect from what I've read is not unique to freebsd hosts. -- John ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org maili

virtualbox tips for performance specific to FreeBSD-10 hosts

ally all guests need to be isolated from one another. It makes backing up and restoring systems pain-free. thanks, -- John ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: virtualbox tips for performance specific to FreeBSD-10 hosts

;ll have to familiarise myself with bhyve. Steep learning curve! thanks, -- John ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

freebsd arm guest on freebsd amd64 bhyve

Hello list, Can a freebsd-arm6 (freebsd11) guest run on a freebsd 10.2 amd64 bhyve host? thanks, -- John ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM?

quot;Use Host I/O Cache". I just enabled that and rebooted the guest. Now the copying on the guest takes 3 seconds. Still, that's clearly slower than 1 second. Any other things I can try? I love FreeBSD and hope we can sort this out. Thanks, John

Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM?

-Original Message- >From: Ted Mittelstaedt >Sent: May 3, 2011 12:02 AM >To: Adam Vande More >Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM? > >On 5/2/2011 7:39 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt >

Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM?

-Original Message- >From: John >Sent: May 3, 2011 2:25 PM >To: >Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM? > > >-Original Message- >>From: Ted Mittelstaedt >>Sent: May 3, 2011 12:02 AM >>To

Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM?

-Original Message- >From: Ted Mittelstaedt >Sent: May 4, 2011 12:48 AM >To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM? > >On 5/3/2011 11:25 AM, John wrote: >> >> -Original Message- >>> From: Ted M

Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM?

-Original Message- >From: Ivan Voras >Sent: May 4, 2011 7:36 AM >To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: virtualbox I/O 3 times slower than KVM? > >On 03/05/2011 20:25, John wrote: > >> What I do is to cat the 330MB binary file (XP service pack from M

Linux graphics tablet driver for FreeBSD

There is an graphics tablet (XP-PEN Star 03). There are official Linux drivers for it (in binary form). Is it possible to make it work on FreeBSD? --- John Brown ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: ports/184296: devel/kBuild won't install on DragonFlyBSD due to hardcoded values in Makefile

The following reply was made to PR ports/184296; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Marino To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, dlo...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/184296: devel/kBuild won't install on DragonFlyBSD due to hardcoded values in Makefile Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:03:38

Re: ports/184296: devel/kBuild will not install on DragonFlyBSD due to hardcoded values in Makefile

The following reply was made to PR ports/184296; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Marino To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, dlo...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/184296: devel/kBuild will not install on DragonFlyBSD due to hardcoded values in Makefile Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:08:22 +0100

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, free...@stratum16.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:37:41

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:32:23 -0400 This

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:43:16 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:09:44 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:17:18 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:34:28 -0400 On

Re: FreeBSD on MacBook -- can the original MacOS be booted inside a VM?

On Jan 14, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Mikhail T. wrote: > I'll have a new laptop soon and would like to run FreeBSD on it (dual boot). > However, I may still need the capabilities of the original MacOS from time to > time. > > One obvious solution would be to simply reboot into MacOS, but I'm wondering,

Re: freebsd arm guest on freebsd amd64 bhyve

On Sep 6, 2015, at 10:52 AM, John wrote: > Can a freebsd-arm6 (freebsd11) guest run on a freebsd 10.2 amd64 bhyve host? In a word, no. Bhyve only does native and legacy-free virtualization, which means the guest MUST be the same architecture as the host. (You can run e.g. a 32-bit i686 gu

Re: SVN r296272 breaks virtualbox

gt; > > > Michael > > > > > +1 Then the port needs to be patched? It's been using an API deprecated for the last 15 years. A simple s/taskqueue_enqueue_fast/taskqueue_enqueue/ will fix it. -- John Baldwin ___ freeb

Re: SVN r296272 breaks virtualbox

700013, so you can use that version. OTOH, I would be surprised if VirtualBox worked on FreeBSD 6.x. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: SVN r296272 breaks virtualbox

ink ripping the band-aid off is fine, especially since the replacement API has been ready for such a long time (and goes back to 7.0). -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: linux-only jail possible?

On Sunday 07 March 2010 05:44:37 Ed Schouten wrote: > * Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:15:12 +0100 Ed Schouten wrote: > > > I am still in doubt what to do. Maybe we could consider committing a > > > patch like this: > > > > [...] > > > > > This is a bit more complete. What i

Re: linux-only jail possible?

On Thursday 04 March 2010 13:22:57 John Nielsen wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2010 05:40:50 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:06:36 +0100 Roman Divacky > > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:59:49AM -0500, John Nielsen wrote: > > >

Re: Request for review/comments: 32-bit compat for non-x86 architectures

s are for, but fixing ia32_reg.h would be a good first step. It would make your diffs smaller I think. The rest of the diff looks fine to me. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Request for review/comments: 32-bit compat for non-x86 architectures

On Wednesday 10 March 2010 9:39:15 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 11:14:27 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > >> The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/compat_freebsd32.diff > >> (pre-generated freebsd32

Re: Request for review/comments: 32-bit compat for non-x86 architectures

On Wednesday 10 March 2010 10:55:40 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 March 2010 9:39:15 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > >> John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >>> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 11:14:27 pm Nathan Whitehorn

Re: linux-only jail possible?

On Tuesday 09 March 2010 03:34:21 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting John Nielsen (from Mon, 8 Mar 2010 > > 17:28:14 -0500): > > I hit another hurdle with Apache but I don't seem to be the first. > > httpd will start but its forked connection-handling children die

Re: linux-only jail possible?

ew=revision&revision=204825 I finally tried the patch from SVN today and it does NOT resolve the openpty issue on FreeBSD 8-STABLE amd64 + CentOS 5.4 i386 jail + OpenSSH 4.3p2. I still (or again) get the "fatal: openpty returns device for which ttyname fails." message. Your prior patch

Re: linux-only jail possible?

On Tuesday 16 March 2010 05:02:21 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting John Nielsen (from Mon, 15 Mar 2010 > > 20:46:05 -0400): > > On Sunday 07 March 2010 05:44:37 am Ed Schouten wrote: > >> * Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:15:12 +01

Re: linux-only jail possible?

On Tuesday 16 March 2010 10:23:37 John Nielsen wrote: > On Tuesday 16 March 2010 05:02:21 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting John Nielsen (from Mon, 15 Mar 2010 > > > > 20:46:05 -0400): > > > On Sunday 07 March 2010 05:44:37 am Ed Schouten wrote: >

CentOS in a FreeBSD jail howto

This is a followup to my thread "linux-only jail possible?" of a few months ago. I've been pretty successful in my efforts and now have a jail which contains only CentOS binaries and runs Python, Apache, sshd, PostgreSQL, yum, rpm, etc without problems. Since that's what I plan to use for my cu

Re: Fwd: CURRENT && 10.1r85/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz

Matthias Apitz wrote at 16:15 +0100 on Nov 5, 2010: > to MAINTAINER: fyi; > > - Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz - > Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:44:05 +0100 > From: Matthias Apitz > To: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org > Subject: CURRENT && 10.1r85/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz

Re: Fwd: CURRENT && 10.1r85/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz

John Hein wrote at 13:47 -0600 on Nov 5, 2010: > Matthias Apitz wrote at 16:15 +0100 on Nov 5, 2010: > > to MAINTAINER: fyi; > > > > - Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz - > > Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:44:05 +0100 > > From: Mat

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: a...@freebsd.org Cc: rdiva...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 00:28:29 -0500

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: rdiva...@vlk.vlakno.cz Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, a...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:04:45

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: a...@freebsd.org Cc: rdiva...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:59:43 -0500

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: a...@freebsd.org Cc: rdiva...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:57:26 -0500

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: a...@freebsd.org Cc: rdiva...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:04:41 -0500

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: a...@freebsd.org Cc: rdiva...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:32:09 -0500

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

SCM_CREDS needs to be converted differently ... currently a nonissue since at the moment I believe the FreeBSD Linux layer doesn't support LOCAL_CRED (actually I don't know if Linux even supports LOCAL_CRED). I'm happy to take

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

both TCP and UNIX domain sockets. -- John ---8<8<-- --- ./compat/linux/linux_misc.h.ORIGINAL2010-12-21 12:09:25.0 -0500 +++ ./compat/linux/linux_misc.h 2011-03-07 23:54:17.0 -0500 @@ -37,6

Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

The following reply was made to PR kern/149168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Wehle To: alexan...@leidinger.net Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org, a...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/149168: [linux] [patch] Linux sendmsg / recvmsg / etc fixes for pulseaudio

Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures

Fixing this problem generically is very hard. Instead, we have patched individual sysctls and ioctls on a case-by-case basis. I do think newer interfaces often opt to use fixed-size types so that the structure is the same for both 32-bit and 64-bit, but that will not work for existing interfaces

www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: John Hein >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: ports >Class: update >Release: >Environment

Re: ports/162498: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable

m...@freebsd.org wrote at 08:05 + on Nov 12, 2011: > Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: miwi > State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 12 08:05:15 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > please update your portstree, its already

Add fadvise(2) to the Linux ABI

This patch teaches the Linux ABIs to use the new posix_fadvise(2) system calls instead of using stubs. I've no good way to test this so would appreciate some extra review or testing. Patch is at http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/fadvise_linux.patch -- John Ba

Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop chapter.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu chapter.sgml

icy. I do think the installer can set a good initial policy for this just as it can for /home. Now, using the default layout the installer could just leave /compat as a dir on /. Many folks still customize their layout to make /usr or /home separa

Re: VirtualBox 4.1.18 compile problem

Mario Lobo wrote at 18:51 -0300 on Jun 28, 2012: > System: FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE > > Trying to compile from ports and get the following error > > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox- > ose/work/VirtualBox-4.1.18/src/VBox/Frontends/VBoxHeadless/FramebufferVNC.cpp: > In member function 'nsresult VNCF

Re: Open-vm-tools

Josh Paetzel wrote at 11:16 -0500 on Oct 20, 2012: > I just installed PC-BSD 9.1-RC2 and virtualbox 4.1.22. I then > installed a vm running FreeBSD 9.1-RC2. I installed the > open-vm-tools from pkg. > > The kernel modules wouldn't load at boot. Turns out the rc.d script > runs a binary called

Re: Open-vm-tools

Josh Paetzel wrote at 17:54 -0500 on Oct 20, 2012: > On Oct 20, 2012, at 5:07 PM, "John Hein" wrote: > > vmware != virtualbox > > The documentation I was able to find on that command don't indicate > it's vmware specific. The open-vm-tools themselves are

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

Bernhard Fröhlich wrote at 16:34 +0100 on Jan 11, 2013: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Brandon Gooch > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Warren Block wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Ryan Stone wrote: > >> > >> As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kerne

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

Warren Block wrote at 00:22 -0700 on Jan 12, 2013: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, John Hein wrote: > > It's in /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk (which is included early by make(1) - > > due to bsd.own.mk inclusion in /usr/shar/mk/bsd.port.mk)... > > > > ..if defined(

[PATCH] Properly handle Linux TCP socket options

MAXSEG2 +#defineLINUX_TCP_KEEPIDLE 4 +#defineLINUX_TCP_KEEPINTVL 5 +#defineLINUX_TCP_KEEPCNT 6 +#defineLINUX_TCP_MD5SIG14 + struct l_sockaddr { l_ushortsa_family; char sa_data

Re: [PATCH] Properly handle Linux TCP socket options

On Monday, January 21, 2013 2:55:22 pm Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:26:13 -0500 John Baldwin wrote: > > > The current setsockopt() wrapper for the Linux ABI claims that Linux > > and FreeBSD use the same values for TCP socket options. This is true >

[PATCH] Move MI bits out of MD linux.h

reduction could be possible if we wanted to make a linux-i386.h that these two headers could share, but that would be a separate project. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/linux_mi.patch -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [PATCH] Move MI bits out of MD linux.h

On Monday, January 28, 2013 12:49:44 pm Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:47:39AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > This patch attempts to reduce duplication between i386/linux/linux.h and > > amd64/linux32/linux.h by moving bits that are MI out into headers in >

virtio-serial available?

Bryan (or anyone on the list)- Can you tell me if virtio-serial is available in a FreeBSD guest? Do you know of any plans for it? I'd like to use it for host<->guest communication a la http://log.amitshah.net/2010/09/communication-between-guests-and-hosts/. Thanks, JN ___

Re: virtio-serial available?

On Apr 23, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Bryan Venteicher wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John Nielsen wrote: >> Bryan (or anyone on the list)- >> >> Can you tell me if virtio-serial is available in a FreeBSD guest? Do you >> know of any plans for it? >> >&

Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose can't work when switching to gcc46

Baptiste Daroussin wrote at 15:22 +0200 on Sep 13, 2013: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:33:57PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Just a tiny background. I'm just experimenting with getting rid of > > in-base gcc and using compiler from ports whenever possible. And gcc46 > > p

Re: vmnet FreeBSD 9.2 and ESXi 5.1

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 04:20:21PM -0700, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I just installed an amd64 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE guest on to an ESXi 5.1 host. I > am getting kernel panics from ESXi when I try to use vmnet NICs, whether from > official vmware tools or from backporting vmnet from HEAD. > > I've bee

patch to make vboxvfs work again

hanks. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." Index: virtualbox-ose/files/patch-src_VBox_Additions_freebsd_vboxv

Re: patch to make vboxvfs work again

rs that they compile libraries w/o the kernel headers and then link those files into the kernel module wrapper... I did notice that we mistakenly still have a prototype for bcmp in sys/systm.h even though that function get's #defined to a builtin instead... > On 5/9/20, John-Mark Gurney

A moving Story of Your Previous Donation

This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp76.com/zn1r5L --

A moving Story of Your Previous Donation

This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: http://ymlp76.com/zmgjCK --