[Bug 234878] emulators/virtualbox-ose: Update to 6.1

2020-06-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234878 --- Comment #89 from Mario Lobo --- I agree with you completely, but we are lagging so far behind on the hosting side (ose and ose-kmod) that I think people that are trying to upgrade it aren't even thinking about the guest-additions port.

Re: How to properly install a Linux desktop app?

2020-06-22 Thread Alexander Leidinger via freebsd-emulation
Quoting "Mikhail T." (from Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:59:35 -0400): On 19.06.20 04:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote: You should not use USE_LINUX_RPM. It's meant for infrastructure ports. Yes, this is the current stance, but it seems like an unnecessary limitation... :( Software distributed by vendors i

[Bug 234878] emulators/virtualbox-ose: Update to 6.1

2020-06-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234878 --- Comment #90 from Mario Lobo --- For the record: FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #1 r360882 Managed to compile cleanly virtualbox-ose-6.1.10 and virtualbox-ose-kmod-6.1.10. Modules load OK: kldstat | grep vbox 43 0x8122c0008cba8

[Bug 234878] emulators/virtualbox-ose: Update to 6.1

2020-06-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234878 --- Comment #91 from Mario Lobo --- A small correction. Starting the VM with VBoxHeadless or VBoxSDL, it just hangs open on the terminal, the process doesn't end with ^C, and even if the terminal is closed, the process still hangs in there

[Bug 247430] Linux ports install too much

2020-06-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247430 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Teterin --- > I don't object to adding a knob for this somewhere, perhaps via > bsd.default-versions.mk since this would be a tree-wide option and not a > per-port option. Actually, it might still be per-port,

Old bug in patch-src_VBox_Additions_freebsd_vboxvfs_vboxvfs__vfsops.c

2020-06-22 Thread Mikhail T.
Gentlemen! An old bug in the patch is causing compiler-warnings, and leads to erroneous behavior where pointers are bigger than 32-bit. Moreover, given the memcpy right after it, the bzero is simply not needed at all. Instead of removing the bogus ampersand, the entire line should be deleted