maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Ben Woods has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to emulat...@freebsd.org: Bug 213698: www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 --- Description --- Adobe ha

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 Bug ID: 213698 Summary: www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 Ben Woods changed: What|Removed |Added CC||woods...@freebsd.org UR

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 Ben Woods changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||security -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 --- Comment #1 from Ben Woods --- Proposed update to VuXML to document these vulnerabilities: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8266 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||merge-quarterly? Statu

[Bug 198541] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11 does not work with firefox 36 or opera 12

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198541 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|emulat...@freebsd.org |ko...@freebsd.org Resoluti

[Bug 212900] www/linux-c6-qt47-webkit: put tab instead of space, remove bogus pkg-descr and pkg-plist

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212900 Tijl Coosemans changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Assignee|emulat.

[Bug 212900] www/linux-c6-qt47-webkit: put tab instead of space, remove bogus pkg-descr and pkg-plist

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212900 --- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: tijl Date: Sat Oct 22 09:54:11 UTC 2016 New revision: 424457 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/424457 Log: Remove unused pkg-descr and pk

[Bug 213264] emulators/linux_base-c6: update grep to 2.20-5.el6_8, use ${SRC_SUFX} instead of .src.rpm

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213264 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: tijl Date: Sat Oct 22 11:46:59 UTC 2016 New revision: 424466 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/424466 Log: Update grep to 2.20-5.el6_8 an

[Bug 213264] emulators/linux_base-c6: update grep to 2.20-5.el6_8, use ${SRC_SUFX} instead of .src.rpm

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213264 Tijl Coosemans changed: What|Removed |Added CC|emulat...@freebsd.org | Assignee|emulat...@fre

[Bug 213265] devel/linux-c6-devtools: update kernel-headers to 2.6.32-642.6.1.el6

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213265 Tijl Coosemans changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|emulat...@freebsd.org |t...@freebsd.org Resoluti

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 --- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: tijl Date: Sat Oct 22 12:21:25 UTC 2016 New revision: 424469 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/424469 Log: Update flash plugin to 11.2r20

[Bug 213698] www/linux-c6-flashplugin11: 11.2r202.632 vulnerable, should update to 11.2r202.637 or later

2016-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213698 Tijl Coosemans changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|In Progress Assignee|em

inquiry on freebsd virtualbox port

2016-10-22 Thread jason
Hi There, I am using OSX 10.9.5 (Mavericks) as a host OS with Virtualbox 5.1.8 and I have been having some odd things come up running FreeBSD11p1 as a guest OS. I have The FreeBSD pkg/port virtualbox-ose-additions is currently listed as 5.1.6_1 installed and generally it works great, but it se

Re: inquiry on freebsd virtualbox port

2016-10-22 Thread Adam Vande More
Ωn Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:25 AM, wrote: > Hi There, > > I am using OSX 10.9.5 (Mavericks) as a host OS with Virtualbox 5.1.8 and I > have been having some odd things come up running FreeBSD11p1 as a guest OS. > > I have The FreeBSD pkg/port virtualbox-ose-additions is currently listed > as 5.1.6_

Re: inquiry on freebsd virtualbox port

2016-10-22 Thread Otacílio
Em 22/10/2016 13:03, Adam Vande More escreveu: Ωn Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:25 AM, wrote: Hi There, I am using OSX 10.9.5 (Mavericks) as a host OS with Virtualbox 5.1.8 and I have been having some odd things come up running FreeBSD11p1 as a guest OS. I have The FreeBSD pkg/port virtualbox-ose-a