on 08/04/2012 09:48 Bernhard Fröhlich said the following:
> On Sa., 7. Apr. 2012 21:55:37 CEST, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just for your information...
>>
>> This is a new install on Freebsd 9.0.
>>
>> I kept running afoul of 'pw' errors. The install bailed saying
>>
>>> Creating g
Hi Bernhard,
> >
> > So there should not be a permission problem. The DVD drive is fine,
> > and the DVD is fine.
>
> Either follow http://wiki.freebsd.org/VirtualBox on how to correctly setup
> cd/dvd passthrough or create a disk image from /dev/cd0 with dd and use that
> in vbox.
I did fo
Hi Bernhard,
> > > Using existing group `vboxusers'.
> > > Creating user `vboxusers' with uid `920'.
> > > pw: user 'vboxusers' already exists
> > > *** Error code 74
> > >
> > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose.
> > > *** Error code 1
> >
> > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox
The following reply was made to PR ports/166485; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, turut...@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/166485: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:20:57 +0300
Hi all.
This patc
VirtualBox-4.1.12 build failed on 10-CURRENT:
# uname -a
FreeBSD parancell.ongs.co.jp 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #17 r233718: Sat
Mar 31 09:41:56 JST 2012
r...@parancell.ongs.co.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PARANCELL amd64
# make
kBuild: Compiling VBoxRT -
/home/ports-build/usr/por
The following reply was made to PR ports/166485; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tsurutani Naoki
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/166485: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:31:50 +0900
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
I can
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Daichi GOTO wrote:
> VirtualBox-4.1.12 build failed on 10-CURRENT:
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD parancell.ongs.co.jp 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #17 r233718:
> Sat Mar 31 09:41:56 JST 2012
> r...@parancell.ongs.co.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PARANCELL amd64
> #
I have 6.5GB chromium debug build directory shared through NFS.
When I try building it on FreeBSD i386 guest running on the same host
where NFS server is, it takes 11 sec of intense NFS before it begins to
compile.
But when I try building the same directory from another FreeBSD i386
machine on
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Yuri wrote:
> This is very strange, local NFS should be blazing fast, and I see the
> opposite picture. For some reason local NFS is crippled.
In my tests of virtual box late last year, I found the network layer
extremely slow. I was running a freebsd 9 guest in
On 04/08/2012 20:18, Yuri wrote:
Same NFS operations take 11 sec from the local vbox guest and 3 sec
from the remote host over 100Mb link.
During build, top in guest shows <3% CPU load on average (during intense
NFS), but top on the host shows that VirtualBox process consumes 50% CPU.
Looks l
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Yuri wrote:
> On 04/08/2012 20:18, Yuri wrote:
>
>> Same NFS operations take 11 sec from the local vbox guest and 3 sec from
>> the remote host over 100Mb link.
>>
>
> During build, top in guest shows <3% CPU load on average (during intense
> NFS), but top on the
The following reply was made to PR ports/166485; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko
To: Tsurutani Naoki
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/166485: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 07:30:29 +0300
Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
> I cannot
12 matches
Mail list logo
