Re: i386/138944: Cannot update to FreeBSD 8 Beta from FreeBSD 7

2010-10-07 Thread Charlie Clark
The following reply was made to PR kern/138944; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Charlie Clark" To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-i...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: i386/138944: Cannot update to FreeBSD 8 Beta from FreeBSD 7 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:51:34 +0200 Am 18.09.2009, 20

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Daichi GOTO wrote: I did test to check 2D acceleration effect with this patch, and 2D benchmarks shows about the same index. No effect appears. I want to know that this 2D acceleration feature works for what and thats effect actually. Someone has any ideas? Did you insta

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: Hello! 2010/9/30 Sean C. Farley : apparent regressions.  I tested this with the Nvidia driver, and it shows improvement within the VM.  I do not know how other drivers will work.  EXA may be required over XAA. Just remember to check "Enable 2D

VirtualBox QT issue

2010-10-07 Thread Adam Vande More
Not sure this is technically an emulation issue, but have only encountered on Vbox. The issue goes like this, I run Vbox on another computer and the VM's are headless. Occasionally, I'll start the VirtualBox GUI client remotely(ssh -Y) to manage settings, etc. The remote system also used an Nvid

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Michael Butler
On 10/07/10 15:02, Sean C. Farley wrote: > Run VBoxTestOGL and check the log's output: > VBoxTestOGL --test 2D --test 3D --log vboxtest.log > > It may show something. Before the patch, --help did not show --test 2D > as a valid option. Now this is interesting .. 2D doesn't work for the lack of .

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 07 October 2010 03:55 pm, Michael Butler wrote: > On 10/07/10 15:02, Sean C. Farley wrote: > > Run VBoxTestOGL and check the log's output: > > VBoxTestOGL --test 2D --test 3D --log vboxtest.log > > > > It may show something. Before the patch, --help did not show > > --test 2D as a vali

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Michael Butler wrote: On 10/07/10 15:02, Sean C. Farley wrote: Run VBoxTestOGL and check the log's output: VBoxTestOGL --test 2D --test 3D --log vboxtest.log It may show something. Before the patch, --help did not show --test 2D as a valid option. Now this is interestin

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Michael Butler
On 10/07/10 16:43, Sean C. Farley wrote: > I do not know if all the zeros have to be ones for 2D to be supported or > not. The Intel v2.7 driver may not support 2D at least for your video > card. You could try xf86-video-intel29 instead of xf86-video-intel to > see if that helps. You need to rem

Re: VirtualBox 2D acceleration

2010-10-07 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! 2010/10/7 Sean C. Farley : >> I use 8.1-STABLE/amd64 with ATI RV370 >> [Radeon X300SE] video adapter, X.Org X Server 1.7.5, video driver >> "radeon", direct rendering enabled, "AccelMethod" is "EXA". >> What else should I check in order to verify why the "Enable 2D Video >> Acceleration" op

fix typo in amd64/linux32/syscalls.master

2010-10-07 Thread Alexander Best
just a typo. please don't forget to run 'make sysent' to populate the changes. cheers. alex ps: typo doesn't exist in i386/pc98 syscalls.master. -- a13x diff --git a/sys/amd64/linux32/syscalls.master b/sys/amd64/linux32/syscalls.master index cff2ad7..9c89946 100644 --- a/sys/amd64/linux32/sysc