https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Bug 247219 depends on bug 260249, which changed state.
Bug 260249 Summary: Linuxulator: Cannot run Linux version of Kerbal Space
Program
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260249
What|Removed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Bug 247219 depends on bug 271300, which changed state.
Bug 271300 Summary: kernel panics when using linux module (mutex umtxql not
owned / recursed on non-recursive mutex)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271300
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Bug 247219 depends on bug 274538, which changed state.
Bug 274538 Summary: panic: vrefact: wrong use count 0
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=274538
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|266745 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Bug 247219 depends on bug 281526, which changed state.
Bug 281526 Summary: Linuxulator - fstatat unsupported flag 0x800
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281526
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Fernando Apesteguía changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||267121
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tr...@freebsd.org |emulat...@freebsd.org
:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219
[Bug 247219] [meta] Linux Emulation (Linuxulator) Tracking Issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277118
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|emulat...@freebsd.org
--
You are r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249282
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249282
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249282
Alex S changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwt...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Alex
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249282
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|emulat...@freebsd.org
--
You are r
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:49:25AM +0200, free...@sysctl.cz wrote:
> Dne 2020-05-11 13:56, Konstantin Belousov napsal:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:28:23AM +0200, free...@sysctl.cz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I tried debug with gdb for linux emulation
> > &
Dne 2020-05-12 00:49, free...@sysctl.cz napsal:
Dne 2020-05-11 13:56, Konstantin Belousov napsal:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:28:23AM +0200, free...@sysctl.cz wrote:
Hi,
I tried debug with gdb for linux emulation
and have issue with kernel panic.
kldload linux64.ko
gdb ./Discord or other linux
Dne 2020-05-11 13:56, Konstantin Belousov napsal:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:28:23AM +0200, free...@sysctl.cz wrote:
Hi,
I tried debug with gdb for linux emulation
and have issue with kernel panic.
kldload linux64.ko
gdb ./Discord or other linux binary
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:28:23AM +0200, free...@sysctl.cz wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried debug with gdb for linux emulation
> and have issue with kernel panic.
>
> kldload linux64.ko
> gdb ./Discord or other linux binary
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
&
Hi,
I tried debug with gdb for linux emulation
and have issue with kernel panic.
kldload linux64.ko
gdb ./Discord or other linux binary
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 3; apic id = 03
fault virtual address = 0x18
fault code = supervisor read data, page not
On 2020-02-07 07:53, Steve Roome wrote:
Theron, did you maybe this one ?
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/README.md
I did have that tool in mind, but it looks like it still is in need of
someone to patch it to test Linux calls in fbsd, rather than fbsd in
fbsd or linux in linux
This box was freebsd-updated a couple of days ago to:
FreeBSD tv.home.firejug.net 12.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p2
GENERIC amd64
Thanks Konstantin for the sys/compat/linux/linux_futex patch, I will
try it and report back asap.
Theron, did you maybe this one ?
https://github.com/google/sy
running a system call fuzzer against linux emulation
(recently)?
There is the Linux compliance test suite but I've never seen it trigger
a kernel panic.
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:46:56PM +, Steve Roome wrote:
> I keep getting panics (short backtraces later on) while running Factorio
> for Linux.
>
> It is using a slightly newer linux glibc than the one in the linux-c7
> ports, but still, I'm running as a user, and it's causing panics. This is
I keep getting panics (short backtraces later on) while running Factorio
for Linux.
It is using a slightly newer linux glibc than the one in the linux-c7
ports, but still, I'm running as a user, and it's causing panics. This is a
64bit linux program that other than these packages on top of a stock
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(dchagi |maintainer-feedback+,
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-emulat...@freebsd.org emulat...@freebsd.org> On Behalf Of T?l Coosemans
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 5:01 PM
> To: Chen, Weike
> Cc: emulat...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: FATAL error after upgrade glib
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234713
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234713
--- Comment #5 from Fedor Uporov ---
MFC`ed to stable/11.
Revision: r342999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing li
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234713
--- Comment #4 from Fedor Uporov ---
(In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #3)
Ok, I will prepare the phabricator review soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234713
--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston ---
(In reply to Fedor Uporov from comment #2)
Indeed, I think the stubs should be modified to return EOPNOTSUPP. I'm not
sure why it wasn't that way before... with the previous translation of ENOATTR
it j
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234713
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Uporov ---
The listxattr and other extattr related linux emulator calls are implemented as
dummy calls.
See DUMMY_XATTR macro in the linux_dummy.c. The dummy calls return values are
ENOATTR in all cases. After the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234713
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|b...@freeb
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:20 PM wrote:
>
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>
> Hi Linux emulation experts,
>
> I installed 'linux_base-c7' on freeBSD12, and its glibc version is '2.17',
> but I have a linux application, it is depended on glibc-2.27.
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 04:20:02 + wrote:
> I installed 'linux_base-c7' on freeBSD12, and its glibc version is
> '2.17', but I have a linux application, it is depended on glibc-2.27.
> So I upgrade the glibc in /compat/linux to '2.27', (I just copy glibc
> 2.27 from Ubuntu 18.04 to 'compat/linux/l
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Hi Linux emulation experts,
I installed 'linux_base-c7' on freeBSD12, and its glibc version is '2.17', but
I have a linux application, it is depended on glibc-2.27.
So I upgrade the glibc in /compat/linux to '2.27', (I just copy
On 06/10/18 18:24, Kevin Oberman wrote:
The system does NOT think any of these ports are installed. I ran "pkg
info" on all of them and none showed up as installed. None was
installed when I re-installed linux-c7-gtk2. That includes atk,
pango, gdkpixbf2 or png (the linux-c7 versions).
Thank
dy "installed" i.e. registered as such, but that its files were
> missing due to some other problem.
>
> I kept adding one port after another, but I have no idea where that ends.
> The ports system should install all dependencies automatically. Since only
> a single linux emu
ing due to some other problem.
I kept adding one port after another, but I have no idea where that
ends. The ports system should install all dependencies automatically.
Since only a single linux emulation port is a dependency, I guessed
that linux-c7-gtk2 is the culprit, bu reinstalling it gene
be a
> good idea to reinstall any linux-c7 ports you are using.
>
I think you miss my point. I know how to install linux-c7-libpng. My
concern is why this whole set of ports was not already installed. I kept
adding one port after another, but I have no idea where that ends. The
ports syste
On 06/08/18 16:25, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Installing linux-c7-gtk2-2.24.31...
/compat/linux/usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-32: error while loading
shared libraries: libpng15.so.15: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
/compat/linux/usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-64: error whi
Running 11.2 r334502. All ports current and using linux-c7.
My linux compatibility stuff seems to be messed up a bit.
I was unable to run nspluginwrapper. I would invoke "nspluginwrapper -v -a
-i" and failed due to a missing library. First it was libatk-1.0.so.0. I
installed linux-c7-atk then was
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73777
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |Overcome By Events
--
You are recei
Hi
I am runing a java web application under FreeBSD 10.3, Because some reason we
must use the Oracle JDK. It all work fine. Even the Java Flight Recorder works
fine.
I have a monitor tools require to dynamic attach to the JVM. the attach can not
work.
# /usr/local/linux-oracle-jdk1.8.0/bin/js
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164957
Dmitry Chagin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Dmitry Chagin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #34 from Kubilay
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
meowth...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #158638|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Namik Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||namik.sm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #31 from Ed Maste ---
> stable/10 is thawed, so it can be merged ASAP for increased exposure, right?
There's a desire for additional testing / review in HEAD prior to merging
still.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #30 from Nikolai Lifanov ---
stable/10 is thawed, so it can be merged ASAP for increased exposure, right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #29 from Ed Maste ---
Or perhaps 10.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #28 from Johannes Jost Meixner ---
(In reply to Glen Barber from comment #27)
Indeed, this seems the reasonable plan of action at this point.
Oh well. 11.0-RELEASE then ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Glen Barber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.1-STABLE |10.2-STABLE
--- Comment #27 from Gle
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #26 from Edward Tomasz Napierala ---
Okay. So, this situation sucks, but I've thought this over and I'd rather not
MFC it myself.
It's not just that I'd be quite uncomfortable merging a megabyte of somebody
else's changes to s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #25 from Johannes Jost Meixner ---
(In reply to Edward Tomasz Napierala from comment #23)
Edward:
I was hoping Dmitry was going to do this before code slush, then before code
freeze. Ah well, they're keeping him really busy at
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #24 from Glen Barber ---
If someone(tm) is going to propose this to re@ for inclusion in 10.2-RELEASE,
it needs to happen as soon as possible. (Preferably before the next 10.2
builds start this Friday.)
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #23 from Edward Tomasz Napierala ---
I assumed Johannes was going to to do this, but now it looks like it might not
happen. Damn.
Glen, realistically, how much time do we have before it's too late for 10.2?
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #22 from Glen Barber ---
(In reply to pkubaj from comment #21)
> (In reply to Glen Barber from comment #20)
> Can anyone do it, or does it have to be from a committer?
Yes, it must be from a committer, specifically the committe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
pku...@riseup.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pku...@riseup.net
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #20 from Glen Barber ---
No one has submitted the commit approval request to re@.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-emulation@fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #19 from Nikolai Lifanov ---
Are there any obstacles to this being accepted for MFC to 10.2?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-e
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #18 from Nikolai Lifanov ---
I confirmed that on 10.2-BETA1 system, running kernel from 10-STABLE with the
patch I posted applied, i386 CentOS 6 packages work, my i386 CentOS 6.6 chroot
works, and I was able to create an x86_64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Nikolai Lifanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #158849|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Nikolai Lifanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lifa...@mail.lifanov.com
--- Com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
meowth...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meowth...@googlemail.com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #14 from Johannes Jost Meixner ---
(In reply to Johannes Jost Meixner from comment #13)
Doesn't build; fails like so:
https://dpaste.de/Mpdk/raw
That's with a patched 10-STABLE off earlier this afternoon.
Path: .
Working Copy
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #13 from Johannes Jost Meixner ---
(In reply to meowthink from comment #3)
Testing out your patch now. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #12 from Johannes Jost Meixner ---
(In reply to meowthink from comment #3)
You could test with
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1746
if you have an svn/git portstree with arc set up on
https://reviews.freebsd.org,
do `arc patch D
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #11 from Glen Barber ---
I'm going to make one final attempt to make sure I am very clear on the problem
here:
Someone(tm) needs to verify that binaries built on 10.1-RELEASE (as they are
built for all supported 10.x releases)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #10 from Edward Tomasz Napierala ---
That said, it's better safe than sorry, so exp build is certainly a good idea
anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #9 from Edward Tomasz Napierala ---
In this case, building the packages is actually just repacking existing
binaries
from RPMs; they end up being the exact same binaries regardless of the FreeBSD
version there were built ("repac
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #8 from Glen Barber ---
(In reply to Glen Barber from comment #7)
> Portmgr, can we set aside one of the exp builders for this, and make the
> resultant package set available publicly?
For clarification, I do not mean public fo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #7 from Glen Barber ---
Kernel binary interface = KBI.
The way this needs to be tested is someone(tm) needs to build the packages on
10.1-RELEASE-pN, and install the packages on a 10.2-BETA installation, and
ensure the linuxula
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Chagin ---
As far as I understand Linuxulator changes does not break the kernel ABI. I can
spend a bit of time to merge it, but i do not have hw and time to test it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #5 from Edward Tomasz Napierala ---
Note that I was assuming - and talking - about the ABI in context of MFC, which
is the FreeBSD kernel ABI, not Linux userspace ABI.
I don't know about userspace ABI - the one for actual apps
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #4 from Glen Barber ---
Again, ABI backwards compatibility with 10.1-RELEASE needs to be verified,
since packages are built against the *oldest* supported release on the branch.
Has anyone done this?
If so, what testing has be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #3 from meowth...@googlemail.com ---
Created attachment 158638
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158638&action=edit
patch against stable/10 (10.2-BETA1, r285386)
Here's the lemul64 patch, including patche
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Jost Meixner ---
Judging by trasz@'s reply on stable to the thread that included this PR[1],
it should not. Of course, I am no release engineer nor particularly
knowledgeable about ABI compatibility in general.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Glen Barber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Johannes Jost Meixner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|dcha...@freebsd.org
--
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emulat...@freebsd.org
--
You are
Old Synopsis: Linux emulation freezes machine after heavy usage of cpu and
memory
New Synopsis: [linux] [hang] Linux emulation freezes machine after heavy usage
of cpu and memory
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Chan
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:19:55 -0400
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> Is anyone working on a newer linux-base port?
http://www.leidinger.net/blog/2012/05/18/linux_base-c6/
The status mentioned there didn't change since then.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: P
I admit the "Subject" is a teeny bit of a troll. I have traditionally not
worried that Linux emulation would not be sufficient --- a) many things
come as source and b) linux code is by definition public --- so we'll have
none of the problem a-la-wine.
But our linux emulation is
25.08.2013 05:49, Kenta Suzumoto пишет:
> Hi. The "gamin-0.1.9-6.fc10.src.rpm" distfile for the Linux emulation stuff
> isn't fetching.
> I had to grab it from one of the mirrors on
> http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/26/dist/65/size/10649/name/gamin-0.1.9-6.fc1
Hi. The "gamin-0.1.9-6.fc10.src.rpm" distfile for the Linux emulation stuff
isn't fetching.
I had to grab it from one of the mirrors on
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/26/dist/65/size/10649/name/gamin-0.1.9-6.fc10.src.rpm
SHA256 and size match the one in distinfo.
===&
On 08/14/2013 09:06, MMOCafe wrote:
./server: symbol lookup error: /lib/libstdc++.so.6: undefined symbol:
_ZNSt8messagesIcE2idE, version GLIBCXX_3.4
Prior to installing linux-f10-libg2c, I would get the following errors.
requires /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' and version
`
Thank you in advance to anyone whom is helping!
I am trying to run a application under compat_linux in a jailed
environment.
I installed Linux_base-f10 and linux-f10-libg2c, I am getting the
following errors.
./server: symbol lookup error: /lib/libstdc++.so.6: undefined symbol:
_ZNSt8message
Synopsis: [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using non-blocking TCP
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-emulation->smh
Responsible-Changed-By: smh
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Dec 13 22:16:57 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer
Old Synopsis: ptrace is broken in Linux emulation
New Synopsis: [linux] ptrace is broken in Linux emulation
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 03:15:13 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over
the user community will better
> served by more of a "big picture" look at linux emulation and freebsd
> - going forward.
The big picture is, that Fedora is not the way to proceed. A long-term
distribution should be chosen for the next linux_base. CentOS is a
candidate for this. We h
essage in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/linux-emulation-tp5703566p5705210.html
Sent from the freebsd-emulation mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
11.05.2012 21:06, caindie пишет:
> Assuming I can find an rpm, I'm not sure how to issue an rpm -Uvh command
> within bsd such that it properly installs the rpm in the proper path.
The FreeBSD Handbook, 11.2.3 Installing a Random Linux RPM Based
Application.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeB
don't think the answer to that should revolve around my
specific need. I think the user community will better served by more of a
"big picture" look at linux emulation and freebsd - going forward.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/linux-emulation-t
A little research implied - to me - that the message is a result of
using a
version of gtk2 that is too old to support the application:
linux-f10-gtk2 2.14.7_3
gtk2-2.18 may solve the problem, if this is the problem.
Assuming I can find an rpm, I'm not sure how to issue an rpm -Uvh
comma
in bsd such that it properly installs the rpm in the proper path.
uname -a
FreeBSD pcbsd-6433 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #10: Tue May 1 15:27:17
PDT 2012
r...@build9x64.pcbsd.org:/usr/obj/builds/amd64/pcbsd-build90/fbsd-source/9.0/sys/GENERIC
amd64
TIA
--
View this message in cont
Quoting "Jukka A. Ukkonen" (from Sun, 18 Mar 2012
17:53:52 +0200):
Hi all,
I suppose someone may have been thought about this already before.
Anyhow just in case I am the first one to raise the question...
Would it not be better to install 64 bit amd64 Linux libraries and binaries
on an amd
Hi all,
I suppose someone may have been thought about this already before.
Anyhow just in case I am the first one to raise the question...
Would it not be better to install 64 bit amd64 Linux libraries and binaries
on an amd64 system running FreeBSD?
This would make it easier to use things like
gt;> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:27:24PM +0100, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> Hello!
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Perhaps emula
ri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:27:24PM +0100, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>> >> >> >>> Hello!
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Perhaps emulation@ is a better place to report this problem?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> &g
gt;> >> >>> Hello!
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Perhaps emulation@ is a better place to report this problem?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Bengt
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
