Hi,
I read this as old unbranded linux binaries can still reboot the system out of
the blue. As such I would say that we should keep the good example of branding
of linux binaries (business as usual).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and sp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux binaries
> is resolved in all supported branches?
>
The static linux binaries built with the modern binutils are implicitely
branded.
> Bye,
> Alex
Hi,
the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux binaries
is resolved in all supported branches?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
errors. Kostik Belousov hat geschrieben:On Sun, Dec 11,
2011 at 10:12:1
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec.
> Should those files be branded to linux?
I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1))
for any supported FreeBSD release an
Hi List,
linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec.
Should those files be branded to linux?
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing
