Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-29 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 11/01/2013 17:34 Bernhard Fröhlich said the following: > I think this is an unwanted side effect. In fact I changed the defintion of > where the kernel module should be installed in virtualbox-ose-kmod/Makefile > from KMODDIR=/boot/modules to KMODDIR?=/boot/modules to allow > overwriting the KMO

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules location

2013-01-17 Thread kaltheat
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:47:22 +0100 kaltheat wrote > > > Hi, > > is there a reason why VirtualBox kernel modules are located in /boot/kernel/ > and not in /boot/modules/ ? > > I installed a custom kernel into a different directory than /boot/kernel > using KODIR and

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-14 Thread John Hein
Warren Block wrote at 00:22 -0700 on Jan 12, 2013: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, John Hein wrote: > > It's in /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk (which is included early by make(1) - > > due to bsd.own.mk inclusion in /usr/shar/mk/bsd.port.mk)... > > > > ..if defined(MODULES_WITH_WORLD) > > KMODDIR?= /b

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-14 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Ryan Stone wrote: As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kernel /boot/kernel.old Should ports put

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-11 Thread Warren Block
(viewmail-i...@nongnu.org removed from Cc list, sorry if that was correct.) On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, John Hein wrote: It's in /usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk (which is included early by make(1) - due to bsd.own.mk inclusion in /usr/shar/mk/bsd.port.mk)... ..if defined(MODULES_WITH_WORLD) KMODDIR?=

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-11 Thread John Hein
Bernhard Fröhlich wrote at 16:34 +0100 on Jan 11, 2013: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Brandon Gooch > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Warren Block wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Ryan Stone wrote: > >> > >> As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kerne

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-11 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Ryan Stone wrote: >> >> As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kernel >>> /boot/kernel.old >>> >>> Should ports put modules in /boot/modules to a

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-11 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Ryan Stone wrote: > > As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kernel >> /boot/kernel.old >> >> Should ports put modules in /boot/modules to avoid this kind of thing? >> > > I thought so, but the Porter's H

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-10 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Ryan Stone wrote: As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kernel /boot/kernel.old Should ports put modules in /boot/modules to avoid this kind of thing? I thought so, but the Porter's Handbook doesn't say anything about it. multimedia/cuse4bsd-kmod installs

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-10 Thread Ryan Stone
As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kernel /boot/kernel.old Should ports put modules in /boot/modules to avoid this kind of thing? ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulatio

Re: VirtualBox kernel modules

2013-01-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2013-01-10 20:34, Warren Block wrote: emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod puts the built kernel modules in /boot/kernel along with all the system kernel modules. However, somewhere in the buildworld/kernel/installworld process, these modules are deleted. Deinstalling the port shows this: # make