On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:21:26PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
I'd call a thorough test, but it
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:11:35PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block w
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>[...]
> In any case, I'd rather have a port that is not 100% than no port at
> all. Announcing possible problems in the pkg-message would be
> appropriate.
Well if we can establish that readonly works consistently at least
for `some
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:21:26PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
> >>> I'd call a thorough test, but it did read everything i
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> ...there
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
I'd call a thorough test, but it did read everything in the filesystem
without problems.
Ok that sounds promising... Someone want to do
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
I'd call a thorough test, but it did read everything in the filesystem
without problems.
Ok that sounds promising... Someone want to do more tests or should I
just commit the port
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
now finally made a port of. I don't know how stable this is on
FreeBSD or if th
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>
> > ...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
> > now finally made a port of. I don't know how stable this is on
> > FreeBSD or if there still may be bugs, so pl
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
now finally made a port of. I don't know how stable this is on
FreeBSD or if there still may be bugs, so please give this a good test
and post your results here. Here's a simple exam
(Yes this thread is a bit old but now I may have a solution...)
In article <20100706032057.ga15...@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> you write:
>0n Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:58:58PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>
>>Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
>>vd
0n Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:58:58PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
>vdi file directly?
>
>There's a tantalizingly-named ImageMounter/VBoxFUSE, which is probably
>not what that implies.
>
>It wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
