On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:21:26PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
I'd call a thorough test, but it
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:11:35PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block w
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>[...]
> In any case, I'd rather have a port that is not 100% than no port at
> all. Announcing possible problems in the pkg-message would be
> appropriate.
Well if we can establish that readonly works consistently at least
for `some
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:21:26PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
> >>> I'd call a thorough test, but it did read everything i
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> ...there
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
I'd call a thorough test, but it did read everything in the filesystem
without problems.
Ok that sounds promising... Someone want to do
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
Dumping the partitions of that FreeBSD system worked just now. Not what
I'd call a thorough test, but it did read everything in the filesystem
without problems.
Ok that sounds promising... Someone want to do more tests or should I
just commit the port
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:06:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>
> >>> ...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
now finally made a port of. I don't know how stable this is on
FreeBSD or if th
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:44:37PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
>
> > ...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
> > now finally made a port of. I don't know how stable this is on
> > FreeBSD or if there still may be bugs, so pl
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
...there is a much simpler fusefs tool in debian called vdfuse that I
now finally made a port of. I don't know how stable this is on
FreeBSD or if there still may be bugs, so please give this a good test
and post your results here. Here's a simple exam
(Yes this thread is a bit old but now I may have a solution...)
In article <20100706032057.ga15...@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> you write:
>0n Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:58:58PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>
>>Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
>>vd
If you're creating the VM from scratch, you may use raw file-backed disk image
along with VMDK format wrapper. You may create a sparse file
# truncate -s 2G img
or a preallocated one
# dd if=/dev/zero of=img bs=1m count=2048
, then create a character device for it
# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f im
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
>> vdi file directly?
>>
>> There's a tantalizingly-named ImageMounter/VBoxFUSE, which is probably not
>> wha
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
> vdi file directly?
>
> There's a tantalizingly-named ImageMounter/VBoxFUSE, which is probably not
> what that implies.
>
> It would be great to be able to access vdi fi
0n Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:58:58PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
>vdi file directly?
>
>There's a tantalizingly-named ImageMounter/VBoxFUSE, which is probably
>not what that implies.
>
>It wo
Is there any hope of a utility like mdconfig that would allow mounting a
vdi file directly?
There's a tantalizingly-named ImageMounter/VBoxFUSE, which is probably
not what that implies.
It would be great to be able to access vdi files without having to
waste time and space converting them to
17 matches
Mail list logo
