2012/4/22 Alexander Leidinger :
>>
>> Look to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165900
>
> I'm working on this now. You've put yourself as maintainer in the
> port. Thanks a lot for this, but if this shall replace the current
> linux_base port at some point in time, it would be better if i
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:51:33 +0900 Svyatoslav Lempert
wrote:
> > I just tested CentOS 6.2 and this system binaries work and run
> > without problem, but I need change compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.18,
> > I'll make soon port for setup CentOS 6.x userland (like
> > emulators/linux_base-f10 there a
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> I don't know enough about CentOS, does it make sense to name it c62 or
> is the .2 just a maintenance release like Solaris 10 update X (in
> this case c6 is sensible, off course)?
c6 would be appropriate. 6.2 is a maintenance update.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:51:33 +0900 Svyatoslav Lempert
wrote:
> > I just tested CentOS 6.2 and this system binaries work and run
> > without problem, but I need change compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.18,
> > I'll make soon port for setup CentOS 6.x userland (like
> > emulators/linux_base-f10 there a
> I just tested CentOS 6.2 and this system binaries work and run without
> problem, but I need change compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.18,
> I'll make soon port for setup CentOS 6.x userland (like
> emulators/linux_base-f10 there are all very similar) and send this as
> PR.
Look to http://www.freebsd
2012/3/10 Alexander Leidinger :
>>
>> # ./bash
>> FATAL: kernel too old
>>
>> # file bash
>> bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux),
>> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped
>>
>> # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32
>> compat.linux.osr
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:41:23 +0900 Svyatoslav Lempert
wrote:
> >>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required
> >>> > by eagle)
> >>> >
> >>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will
> >>> > need an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11,
>>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
>>> > eagle)
>>> >
>>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need
>>> > an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14
>>> > version.
>>> >
>>> > Are there plans to update l
Quoting Lars Engels (from Fri, 9 Mar 2012
14:44:33 +0100):
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:44:25PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012
12:16:27 -0500):
> eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
> eagle)
>
> I can run version
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:44:25PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 -0500):
>
> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
> > eagle)
> >
> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need
> >
Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 -0500):
eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
eagle)
I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need
an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14
version.
Are ther
Dear Sir(s),
I would like to run the latest version of Eagle, an electronic
cad program on my freebsd 9.0 AMD64 system. Unfortunately, I
am unable to make this work, as the latest version of Eagle
reports
eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
eagle)
I can run ve
12 matches
Mail list logo
