Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:28:49 -0500
> David Sledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >EPIC, RDT and the RadRails plugin work as well. The current shar
> > file is available at [1]http://www.freshdevonrails.com .
> >Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote:
"David Sledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Same problem exist with Firefox 2.0_1. You have to use mozilla for eclipse to
> work correctly.
Yup, installing mozilla lets eclipse compile. As for the "work
correctly" part, I'll just accept it as it is for now. I don't have
the time to dig into the
Greg Lewis writes:
> Does anyone know of a showstopper that would prevent us from updating the
> current eclipse (3.4.2 IIRC) to what is currently in eclipse-devel (3.5.2)?
>
> If not then I'd propose to do that once the code freeze is over so that
> eclipse-devel can be used for people to work o
Greg Lewis writes:
> That is the idea. Copy eclipse-devel to eclipse to get that more up to date.
> Test out 3.6 in eclipse-devel then copy it over as well.
Great! Thanks for the clarification.
tg
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
Moin,
I noticed that JUnit4 doesn't work out of the box with the eclipse port.
The reason seems to be the loop in the do-install target, which installs
jars from ${BUILD_WRKSRC} to the final installation directory. I've
removed that loop and instead added "-L" to the "cp -R" command in
build.xml.
ken writes:
> Thomas,
> I have tried your patch attached, but had the following patch error.
> Could you try to compressing diff file?
Hm, maybe the patch was corrupted in the mail. You can now also get the
file from http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/eclipse-devel.diff>.
HTH,
tg
__
ken writes:
> Thank you!
> I downloaded and the patch applied cleanly.
> However, I have compile errors and could not complete the compilation on
> FreeBSD-current (amd64).
> It is seemingly because of org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDTCompilerAdapter not
> being compiled.
>
> :
Michael Martin writes:
> On 10/28/2010 02:26, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
>> ken writes:
>>
>>>Thank you!
>>>I downloaded and the patch applied cleanly.
>>> However, I have compile errors and could not complete the compilation on
>>> Free
Michael Martin writes:
> I'm seeing the same error on amd64 build.
I'm going to set up a virtual machine running FreeBSD/amd64 over the
weekend. For now I might have a fix for this problem:
> Running make the first time errors out in not finding the swt
> libraries. The native libraries look l
Michael Martin writes:
> On 10/31/10 08:38, ken wrote:
>
> Thomas,
> 20101029-Patch went well and compiled successfully on FreeBSD-current(amd64).
> It starts and goes to banner, but it dies before having screen.
> Something goes wrong with -current + gnome2.
>
>
> I'm running 9.0-CURRENT too, a
ken writes:
> Michael,
> I have the following error after installing some plugins. Are there any
> fixes? xulrunner.gtk.freebsd.x86_64 seemingly not built/installed.
>
> # eclipse-devel
> Bundle org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.freebsd.x86_64 is not found.
>From quickly browsing the web, it look
Greg Lewis writes:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 05:37:50PM +0200, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
>> Moin,
>>
>> attached are patches to upgrade the eclipse-devel port to version 3.6.1.
>
> FWIW, Thomas' patches have been committed to ec
"Ronald Klop" writes:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:37:05 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>
>>> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for eclipse-devel-3.6.1
>>> java: error: no suitable JavaVMs found
>>> *** Error code 1
>>>
>>> Stop in /a/ports/java/eclipse-devel.
>>> =
Looking at the error report again:
>> PATCH_DEPENDS=apache-ant-1.7.1.tbz desktop-file-utils-0.15_2.tbz
>> gamin-0.1.10_4.tbz gettext-0.18.1.1.tbz gio-fam-backend-2.24.2.tbz
>> glib-2.24.2.tbz inputproto-2.0.tbz javavmwrapper-2.3.5.tbz
>> jdk-1.6.0.3p4_19.tbz kbproto-1.0.4.tbz libX11-1.3.3_1,1.t
Pav Lucistnik writes:
> On 2010/11/18 13:58, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
>> Looking at the error report again:
>>
>>>> PATCH_DEPENDS=apache-ant-1.7.1.tbz desktop-file-utils-0.15_2.tbz
>>>> gamin-0.1.10_4.tbz gettext-0.18.1.1.tbz gio-fam-backend-2.24.2.tbz
Greg Lewis writes:
> I haven't seen any problem reports around eclipse-devel since it was
> updated to 3.6.1. Does anyone have any objections to now updating eclipse
> to 3.6.1?
Works fine for me.
tg
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Moin,
I have attached a patch to upgrade the eclipse port to 3.6.2. Seems to
work for me on 8-stable/amd64, but this is a port with a tricky build
process, so I may have easily overlooked something. So, please test, and
send feedback to the list. Thanks.
tg
Index: Makefile
==
On 04/28/11 07:17, Sebastian Chmielewski wrote:
Build failed for me with following error:
buildHelperTask:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse-build-0.6.1/task-bin
[javac] /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/eclipse-build-0.6.1/build.xml:350:
warning: 'includeantruntim
On 04/28/11 07:17, Sebastian Chmielewski wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:24:12 +0200
Thomas Gellekum wrote:
Moin,
I have attached a patch to upgrade the eclipse port to 3.6.2. Seems to
work for me on 8-stable/amd64, but this is a port with a tricky build
process, so I may have easily
On 04/28/11 10:38, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
On 04/28/11 07:17, Sebastian Chmielewski wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:24:12 +0200
Thomas Gellekum wrote:
Moin,
I have attached a patch to upgrade the eclipse port to 3.6.2. Seems to
work for me on 8-stable/amd64, but this is a port with a tricky
Moin,
I've put up patches to upgrade the eclipse-devel port to 3.7.0 at
http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/eclipse-devel-3.7.0.diff>. Please
test and post your feedback to the list. If any committer wants to just
go ahead and commit the changes (the port is marked broken right now
anyway), remembe
On 07/10/11 22:10, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:27:41PM +0200, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
I've put up patches to upgrade the eclipse-devel port to 3.7.0 at
http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/eclipse-devel-3.7.0.diff>. Please
test and post your feedback to the list. If any committ
The following reply was made to PR ports/158859; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Gellekum
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, andy.l...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/158859: [ERROR] cannot portupgrade java/eclipse-devel
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:33:32 +0200
This is a multi-part message
On 07/17/11 22:46, Heiner Strauss wrote:
Am 07/12/11 17:33, schrieb Thomas Gellekum:
Also: I noticed plugins installed as a normal user don't work. I have
no clue yet where that regression comes from. Workaround: install
additional plugins as root.
>
That problem apeared with 3.6 to
On 07/18/11 08:44, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
On 07/17/11 22:46, Heiner Strauss wrote:
Am 07/12/11 17:33, schrieb Thomas Gellekum:
Also: I noticed plugins installed as a normal user don't work. I have
no clue yet where that regression comes from. Workaround: install
additional plugins as
On 07/26/11 21:53, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
pav 2011-07-26 19:53:15 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
java/eclipse-devel Makefile
Log:
- Mark BROKEN: does not package
tar: share/applications/eclipse-devel.desktop: Cannot stat: No such file
or directory
On 08/17/11 02:34, Любомир Григоров wrote:
I installed openjdk 7 and then tried to build eclipse, but it still
downloaded openjdk 6 for the install. Was this only needed for the
compilation and is later removed? I know openjdk 7 needed v6 to compile and
then removed it.
Why does Eclipse still do
On 11/02/11 16:58, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:27:19AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
them committed together with 3.7?
Just note that in the PR is the best way I can think of.
It probably is about time to move t
On 11/03/11 21:59, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:25:43PM +0100, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
On 11/02/11 16:58, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:27:19AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
them committed together
On 11/03/11 22:38, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
On 11/03/11 21:59, Greg Lewis wrote:
Any concerns about upgrading the eclipse port itself to 3.7.0 now or would
you prefer to wait till you've had a chance to look at 3.7.1? I guess
holding off for 9.0 is probably a reason to wait.
I'
[Moved to freebsd-eclipse]
On 02/28/12 13:32, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
I'm working on it (3.7.1; there are no 3.7.2 source tarballs for
download, AFAICS). I should have an update ready by the end of the week.
That turned out to be too optimistic. Everything compiles, but there's
Moin,
I've uploaded patches to upgrade eclipse-devel to 3.7.1 to
http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/eclipse-devel.20120420.diff>. These
work for me on 8-stable, amd64. Please report any problems to the list.
I've not managed to compile 3.7.1 with OpenJDK7 (some problem in the
org.sat4j.pb bundle)
On 07/18/12 23:11, ken wrote:
Thank you for your effort to chase eclipse.
Eclipse upgraded to 4.2, Juno.
Are there any plan to upgrade to Juno, and when can I expect to use it?
I'm working on it.
tg
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing li
Moin,
I've put diffs for the upgrade of eclipse-devel at
http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/eclipse-devel-20120829.diff>. These
compile on 8-stable/amd64.
If someone wants to commit the changes right away (shouldn't be any harm
in doing that, eclipse-devel is ignored right now), please remember t
On 08/31/12 15:13, Greg Lewis wrote:
Looks good other than that to me. I ran into an SVN hurdle committing it
though. files/freebsd-support.patch operates on multiple files and there
are a few with DOS line endings. SVN pukes on commit since it doesn't want
mixed line endings in a file.
Anyt
On 07/25/13 07:28, kron wrote:
> On 2013/07/24 23:03, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Eclipse 4.2, which we have in java/eclipse-devel has been out for
>> over a year and Eclipse 4.3 is "nearly done" as far as anyone can
>> tell.
It's been out for a few weeks now.
>> I'd like to propo
On 11/18/13 17:48, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2013, at 16:37 , Jimmy Kelley wrote:
>
>> I've updated the shar to fix this…
Thank you for stepping up and working on this!
> Now, to the point of how we deal with the upgrade.
>
> I’m not against the idea of moving to eclipse4-kepl
On 11/18/13 19:14, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> OK if we want to keep eclipse3 we should do the following:
>
> eclipse -> eclipse3
> eclipse 4.3 -> eclipse
> eclipse-devel -> IGNORED until we do 4.4
>
> How does that sound?
This is fine with me.
tg
_
38 matches
Mail list logo
