Re: Ports eclipse

2006-07-10 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:03:29PM +0200, Claude CHARPENTIER wrote: > Hi, > when did you think you can upddate this ports to 3.2 version of eclipse ? I would like to know the same, if somebody cares. Just some kind of voting ;) -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky _

Re: Eclipse GUI speed issue

2006-08-16 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 05:48:36PM -0700, PSA wrote: > Alex Pivovarov wrote: > >I have two OS (Suse 10 and FreeBSD 6.1) on my computer (Athlon-XP > >1800+, 512Mb, Seagate 7200) > > > >Suse has jdk15 + Eclipse 3.2 > >FreeBSD diablo-jdk15 + Eclipse 3.1.2 (both installed from packages) > > > >The pro

Re: Eclipse GUI speed issue

2006-08-16 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:53:23AM -0400, David Sledge wrote: >http://www.freshdevonrails.com/eclipse.shar and you can see the history for > it in the archives of the freebsd-java mailing list. Could you please explain how to remove dependency of diablo-jdk1.5 but add dependency of jdk1.5? in Ma

Re: Eclipse GUI speed issue

2006-08-17 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:13:43AM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:16:10PM -0400, David Sledge wrote: > > BUILD_DEPENDS= javac:${PORTSDIR}/java/jdk15 \ > > ant:${PORTSDIR}/devel/apache-ant \ > > Picking a message somewhat at random... > > The first line is c

Re: Eclipse GUI speed issue

2006-08-18 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:29:35PM -0400, David Sledge wrote: > > >the thing is I issued make with arguments > > > >make -DWITHOUT_GNOMEVFS -DWITHOUT_CAIRO -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA > > > >but it still wants Mozilla to be installed? > > > > > Ok, this should be fixed now. I won't be able to update the s

Re: Eclipse GUI speed issue

2006-08-22 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 05:22:39PM -0400, David Sledge wrote: > > That still produces same error :( >Please verify that the patch file >"files/post-patch-plugins-swt-gtk-make_freebsd.mak" matches the >following lines for the all target. >-all: make_swt make_atk make_gnome make_

Re: Is it possible to run eclipse-SDK-3.2.1-linux-gtk on FreeBSD

2006-11-28 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:49:31AM +0100, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote: > Ronald Klop wrote: > >>Is it possible somehow to work in eclipse-SDK-3.2.1-linux-gtk on > >>FreeBSD, > >>may be I need linux-jdk? > > > >Do you know what ports are? > >See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handboo

Re: Need Eclipse 3.2

2007-05-24 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:39:14PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:32:38PM -0700, Peter Steele wrote: > > But this is version 3.2 in distro. I'm looking for a Eclipse 3.2.x that > > will build under FreeBSD 6.2. > > Not sure what you mean by "distro". The port currently

Re: Need Eclipse 3.2

2007-05-25 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:01:23AM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +0300, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:39:14PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote: > > > > > > Not sure what you mean by "distro". The port c

Eclipseme 1.7.3/Eclipse 3.2.2/Sun WTK 2.2 on FreeBSD 5.5

2007-09-13 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
Hello! Could somebody please share success story of creating and debugging midlets on FreeBSD 5.5/Eclipse 3.2.2/EclipseME 1.7.3/Sun WTK 2.2 ? I was able to install all these things, and created some sample midlet, however I can't launch this midlet because of Warning: Running JAM, Ignoring all

Re: Eclipseme 1.7.3/Eclipse 3.2.2/Sun WTK 2.2 on FreeBSD 5.5

2007-09-13 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 12:01:08PM +0300, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > Hello! > > Could somebody please share success story of creating and debugging midlets on > FreeBSD 5.5/Eclipse 3.2.2/EclipseME 1.7.3/Sun WTK 2.2 ? > > I was able to install all these things, and created

eclipse europa build on FreeBSD 6.2

2007-10-24 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
Hello! Does Eclipse 3.3.0 really requires JDK 1.6 to be built? As far as I know, it should be possible to build Eclipse on JDK 1.5, or I'm wrong? I just would like to switch to this newer version, however I don't want JDK 1.6 for now. -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky pgpJhOPU6sHGI.pgp Description: PGP s

building the port java/eclipse-devel fails when -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA specified

2008-07-26 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
Hello! Could somebody please explain, is it possible to build eclipse-devel from ports with setting -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA flag? It was building just fine earlier, but with recent changes looks like it misses some directories? The part of the output is listed below: ===> Vulnerability check disabled

Re: Eclipse Ganymede port

2008-08-05 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 01:36:53PM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > A port of Eclipse Ganymede can be found at the following location: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sepotvin/eclipse-ganymede.tbz > > The port should be working

Re: Eclipse Ganymede port

2008-08-05 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 08:53:02AM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hi, > > This is not expected. Those files should have been installed > automatically by the firefox port. Can you look into the folders listed > by the command "pkg-config --cflags firefox-xp

Re: java/eclipse-devel does not start after installation

2008-11-21 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:10:29PM +0300, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > Hi > > Fresh ports tree, 8-CURRENT, > > $ eclipse-devel > Cannot open > "../../ports/java/eclipse-devel/work/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/65/data/347884009/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.freebsd

Re: Eclipse 3.4.2 update

2009-04-19 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 05:57:25PM +, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > Here's the long overdue update from eclipse 3.4.1 to 3.4.2. There's a > lot of improvements bundled with the update in the way that the eclipse > platform is built on FreeBSD. > > - We are now installing a real eclipse product.

Re: Eclipse 3.4.2 update

2009-04-19 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:20:32PM +, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > It seems that I never learn... I forgot to mention yet again that the > patch should be applied with gpatch (available from port). Okay, looks a bit better, but still with errors. I thought I would need to provide some stripping

Re: Eclipse 3.4.2 update

2009-04-19 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:54:51AM +0900, ken wrote: > Strange > I could gpatch the most recent port/java/eclipse with given diff without > any problem. And I am using new eclipse to see if it is OK or not. > > It may worth to update ports/java/eclipse and apply the patch. I did that

Re: Eclipse 3.4.2 update

2009-04-20 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:21:33AM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:54:51AM +0900, ken wrote: > >> Strange > >> I could gpatch the most recent port/java/eclipse with given diff without > >&

Re: Eclipse 3.4.2 update

2009-04-21 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 08:25:28PM +0300, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:21:33AM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > > Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:54:51AM +0900, ken wrote: > > >> Strange > > >

Re: CFT: Eclipse Galileo 3.5

2009-11-09 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 03:53:05PM -0500, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > Hi, > > Let me guess, you have a mozilla package installed on your system, right? > Give me a day or two and I'll send you an update to fix > the issue. In the mean time, could you temporarily delete your mozilla and > try the

Re: Eclipse 3.5.1

2010-01-02 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:21:20AM +0100, Frank Staals wrote: > On 01/02/10 08:39, Huang wen hui wrote: > > I put subclipse plugin into /usr/local/share/eclipse/dropins, eclipse > > 3.5.1 can recoginzed subclipse correctly. > > > > --hwh > I tried that, out of the box it did not work though: I e