Mike Bowie wrote:
If I may... I don't believe that it's going to get any better over
time... so if not now, when? Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of
confusion, but in the long run the intention is to improve clarity.
Agreed. I took my first stab at this..
Visit http://rucci.org/hg/eclipse-por
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:06:07PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
Mass category moves are stressful for our users IMHO, so we should only
use them if we really feel the hierarchy will be in much better shape
going forwards.
So thats the big question. If we leave the category the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:06:07PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:12:03AM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > A good argument for this is that it has lead to things like the Eclipse
> > plugin for PHP (insert any language other than Java) being in the java
> > category. Thats jus
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:12:03AM -0800, Greg Lewis wrote:
> A good argument for this is that it has lead to things like the Eclipse
> plugin for PHP (insert any language other than Java) being in the java
> category. Thats just plain ridiculous in my view.
My own feeling is that the 'java' phys
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:34:39AM -0500, Daniel Rucci wrote:
> Mike Bowie wrote:
> >That sounds like a reasonable proposition and clearly it's a model
> >already in use. IIRC, there was also mention previously of moving all
> >of the "eclipse bits" to /usr/ports/eclipse... although it's late an
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:13:04PM +0900, ken wrote:
> Yea, I am surviving...
> I am using it and touching it every time I have a problem. So, it is a
> turtle walk...
> About plugins;
> I know that JBossTools GUI which requires newer version of xulrunner does
> not work properly. Als
Mike Bowie wrote:
Ken,
That sounds like a reasonable proposition and clearly it's a model
already in use. IIRC, there was also mention previously of moving all
of the "eclipse bits" to /usr/ports/eclipse... although it's late and
the details escape me at this moment. I think perhaps Dan sug
ken wrote:
Mike,
Yea, I am surviving...
I am using it and touching it every time I have a problem. So, it is a
turtle walk...
About plugins;
I know that JBossTools GUI which requires newer version of xulrunner does
not work properly. Also, GUI editor of eclipse may/may not work.
Mike,
Yea, I am surviving...
I am using it and touching it every time I have a problem. So, it is a
turtle walk...
About plugins;
I know that JBossTools GUI which requires newer version of xulrunner does
not work properly. Also, GUI editor of eclipse may/may not work. I am not
sur
ken wrote:
Hi!
I ported eclipse 3.3.1 to FreeBSD and Greg registered it as eclipse-devel in
ports tree.
I updated eclipse-devel to 3.3.1.1 which is the latest stable version and am
about ready to ask Greg to update the eclipse-devel.
I recognized the bug [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out in
Hi!
I ported eclipse 3.3.1 to FreeBSD and Greg registered it as eclipse-devel in
ports tree.
I updated eclipse-devel to 3.3.1.1 which is the latest stable version and am
about ready to ask Greg to update the eclipse-devel.
I recognized the bug [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out in 3.3.1.1, too
11 matches
Mail list logo
