I think that it is because of org.eclipse.visualeditor-1.3.0.200709121813.zip.
By disabling ve, I could run web page editor.
It, visualeditor, is seemingly causing conflicts with wtp and we may need to
wait for official one of visual editor.
Sorry for self-reply..
_
Mike,
Are you using eclipse-devel without any problems?
I want you to check if wtp (web page editor) works OK at your environment.
I thought that it worked, but now I knew that it does not work. The .log tells
that it has some conflict with other plugins as shown below, but I cannot
ident
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:51 AM
To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.3.1 build
Would amd64 users check if you can compile and run eclipse 3.3.1?
I forgot to update assemble file patch for amd64 with previous tgz. and
updated. (http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-33
Would amd64 users check if you can compile and run eclipse 3.3.1?
I forgot to update assemble file patch for amd64 with previous tgz. and
updated. (http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-331.tgz)
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
Thank you, Jonas for two patches eliminating a use of ant-contrib.
I confirmed that your patch works for both jdk15 and jdk16. And I replaced
my patch to yours in eclipse-europa-331.tgz.
I think that it is now better than 3.3.0 in eclipse-devel.
___
Attached you will find the modified patches. Using them Eclipse builds
without ant-contrib on my computer, but of course I can not guarantee
anything.
The "trick" I used was moving the "conditional parts" into a new
target with a suitable "if" attribute which gets called by an antcall.
I also modi
So far your port seems to work very well for me. Thank you very much!
I found a small glitch, however:
When I tried to use the Eclipse Update Manager it gave me the
following error message:
Error Parsing feature stream.
Error parsing feature stream. Unknown element "condition" in
parsin
Thank you for your comment.
Please eliminate files/patch-features-jdt-features.xml which I forgot to
exclude. (I updated http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-331.tgz.)
Yes, if you upgrade patch files to eliminate the use of ant-contrib, it would
be nice for most of people. Your contribut
Ok,
I think that I made it, at least successful compilation with both
jdk15/jdk16. However, I have not run them as I am using eclipse-europa itself
for eclipse porting which I do not want to disturb.
Would you please try if it works for you? It is in
http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-
Jonas Wolz wrote:
Mike Bowie wrote:
One of the 3.3.0 port version we had built and ran quite happily with
jdk1.5, but we've not seen the same success with 3.3.1 so far.
I may have a poke at it this weekend and see what we can wrangle. For
now the eclipse-devel port is tied to jdk1.6 and the up
Mike Bowie wrote:
> One of the 3.3.0 port version we had built and ran quite happily with
> jdk1.5, but we've not seen the same success with 3.3.1 so far.
>
> I may have a poke at it this weekend and see what we can wrangle. For
> now the eclipse-devel port is tied to jdk1.6 and the upcoming 3.3.
Jonas Wolz wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
From: Mike Bowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One caveat I failed to mention, is that 3.3.1 doesn't build with jdk1.5
so far. The instructions indicate that it should, but Ken hasn't had
any success as far as I know and I've not looked at it.
* Edit the file bui
Ken Yamada wrote:
> From: Mike Bowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> One caveat I failed to mention, is that 3.3.1 doesn't build with jdk1.5
>> so far. The instructions indicate that it should, but Ken hasn't had
>> any success as far as I know and I've not looked at it.
> * Edit the file build.xml:
>
From: Mike Bowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One caveat I failed to mention, is that 3.3.1 doesn't build with jdk1.5
> so far. The instructions indicate that it should, but Ken hasn't had
> any success as far as I know and I've not looked at it.
In the instruction.html, it says;
QUOTE
3. For th
Doing a bit of a 'Greg' and replying to myself...
Greg,
Have you had a chance to take a look at Ken's 3.3.1 port? I've been
using it for a couple of days now and so far it's certainly as groovy as
the 3.3 that we have in eclipse-devel.
What do you think about kicking eclipse-devel up to 3.3
15 matches
Mail list logo
