On 11/03/11 22:38, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
On 11/03/11 21:59, Greg Lewis wrote:
Any concerns about upgrading the eclipse port itself to 3.7.0 now or would
you prefer to wait till you've had a chance to look at 3.7.1? I guess
holding off for 9.0 is probably a reason to wait.
I'd actually prefe
On 11/03/11 21:59, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:25:43PM +0100, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
On 11/02/11 16:58, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:27:19AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
them committed together w
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:25:43PM +0100, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
> On 11/02/11 16:58, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:27:19AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >> Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
> >> them committed together with 3.7?
> >
> > Just note
On 11/02/11 16:58, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:27:19AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
them committed together with 3.7?
Just note that in the PR is the best way I can think of.
It probably is about time to move t
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 01:27:19AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
> them committed together with 3.7?
Just note that in the PR is the best way I can think of.
It probably is about time to move the eclipse port over to 3.7.
--
Gre
Is there a way to submit my plugin updates for 3.7, now and have
them committed together with 3.7?
Regards
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
