Re: The futur of the roff toolchain

2017-05-21 Thread Joel Dahl
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I would like to change this approach and get back to the initial approach > taken > by others before I jumped in and I would like just entirely remove the roff > toolchain from base and let people rely on GNU roff from ports.

Re: Documenting various GEOM_* kernel options

2013-03-13 Thread Joel Dahl
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 10:11:23AM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote: > > I recently noticed we haven't documented all of the various GEOM_* kernel > options in any manual pages. > > Both the gpart(8) and geli(8) manpages have kernel options in the SYNOPSIS, > which probably isn&

Re: Need help documenting development processes in FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Joel Dahl
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:57:20PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hi, > In order to bring contributors up to speed on how to interact with > FreeBSD, I want to document some of the items that aren't really noted in > the FreeBSD developers or committers handbook. Some topics that come to > mind

Re: move roff papers from src to doc repository

2013-05-18 Thread Joel Dahl
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:23:40AM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > So, to get groff out of source we need to first remove the roff > docs/papers as we will no longer build and install them. As they still > contain conceivably useful information, I want to move them into the doc > repository. I lik

Documenting various GEOM_* kernel options

2013-03-09 Thread Joel Dahl
Hi, I recently noticed we haven't documented all of the various GEOM_* kernel options in any manual pages. I don't know if this is intentional or not. A quick grep reveals the following ("-" means not documented anywhere): GEOM_AES- GEOM_BDEDocumented in gbde(4) ma