[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 Bug ID: 272795 Summary: FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better. Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Sev

[Bug 260968] Support: Web resources (page update)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260968 Graham Perrin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||264754 --- Comment #3 from Graham

[Bug 264754] FreeBSD Handbook: Appendix C: updates and corrections

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264754 Graham Perrin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||260968 Referenced Bugs: https://

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 --- Comment #1 from Graham Perrin ◐ --- (In reply to Leo Bicknell from comment #0) > … - "use one of the following methods to install it", but then only a > single method (git) follows. … Partly blocked by bug 255323, >> FreeBSD Handbo

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 Graham Perrin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||255323 Referenced Bugs: https://

[Bug 255323] FreeBSD Handbook: document gitup

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255323 Graham Perrin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||272795 Referenced Bugs: https://

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 --- Comment #2 from Graham Perrin ◐ --- (In reply to Leo Bicknell from comment #0) > 2) There is no instruction on what users who previously used portsnap or > svn should do to convert to the newly supported git method. If it is as > si

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 Graham Perrin ◐ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grahamper...@gmail.com --- Comme

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 --- Comment #4 from Leo Bicknell --- (In reply to Graham Perrin ◐ from comment #3) > Six revisions by me in recent weeks. If you can take a fresh look at the wiki > page > (without the FreeBSD Handbook as context or comparison), does the

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 Graham Perrin ◐ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grahamper...@gmail.com --- Comme

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 --- Comment #6 from Leo Bicknell --- > Maybe more relevant to focus on the version of FreeBSD. For example: I'm not sure that addresses my concern, but perhaps my concern isn't valid? The scenario I run into from time to time is: - Insta

[Bug 272795] FreeBSD Handbook section 4.5.1 could be better.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272795 --- Comment #7 from Graham Perrin ◐ --- (In reply to Leo Bicknell from comment #6) Side note: if you wrap text manually for Bugzilla, please make your texts narrower. I have a user script that widens things, online, however most readers (

[Bug 272690] Twitter no longer reliably available to the public

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272690 Edward.Sanford.Sutton, III changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mirror...@hotmail.com