The futur of the roff toolchain

2017-05-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I have been working for a while to try to import a modern roff toolchain into base. I didn't like the initial approach that consisted in simply removing all roff toolchain in base. Recap of the situation in base: * We have GNU roff version 1.19.2 in base (latest GPLv2 version). Lots of b

handbook: 7.7 Image Scanners devfs.rules

2017-05-21 Thread corvid
In the handbook, section 7.7, near the bottom, it reads: > Then, make the /dev/ugen0.2 symlink and the /dev/usb/0.2.0 device node > accessible to the usb group with write permissions of 0660 or 0664 by adding > the following lines to /etc/devfs.rules: > [system=5] > add path ugen0.2 mode 0660

[Bug 219434] Fix typos in usr.sbin/efivar/efivar.8

2017-05-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219434 Bug ID: 219434 Summary: Fix typos in usr.sbin/efivar/efivar.8 Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Aff

Re: The futur of the roff toolchain

2017-05-21 Thread Joel Dahl
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I would like to change this approach and get back to the initial approach > taken > by others before I jumped in and I would like just entirely remove the roff > toolchain from base and let people rely on GNU roff from ports.

[Bug 219434] Fix typos in usr.sbin/efivar/efivar.8

2017-05-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219434 Jimmy Olgeni changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, patch-ready -- You are rece

[Bug 219434] Fix typos in usr.sbin/efivar/efivar.8

2017-05-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219434 Benjamin Kaduk changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org |b...@freebsd.org Stat

Re: The future of the roff toolchain

2017-05-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > What I want to propose now, it to render them as PDF (html?) once and push > them > somewhere (to be defined) as static document on our documentation website. > Please doceng@ provide me a location where to push them. > > An

Re: The future of the roff toolchain

2017-05-21 Thread Mike Karels
On 21 May 2017, at 15:36, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: What I want to propose now, it to render them as PDF (html?) once and push them somewhere (to be defined) as static document on our documentation website. Please doceng@ pro

Re: The futur of the roff toolchain

2017-05-21 Thread Eric van Gyzen
I like all of this. Thanks for your very thorough research and effort. Eric On 05/21/2017 07:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been working for a while to try to import a modern roff toolchain into > base. > > I didn't like the initial approach that consisted in simply removing

Re: having trouble making changes to the handbook

2017-05-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:17:47AM -0400, Ernie Luzar wrote: > I am following the info in this link > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/ > > I installed the textproc/docproj package. > > The above link says that svn is installed as part of that port. But it > really is

Invitatie la dezvoltare - programele de training din perioada urmatoare

2017-05-21 Thread Dynamic Training Solutions
| ![](http://nl.training-info.ro/Fnt36ut8CN10V5F13WSq06HsZfb8pstyfqqgIgTID6BYslvBFl9m3OuHD9g-bGEf_HYX4gUR5Ra2gg83ZrfyHt8VeRAMlmrE-GRO3OgdSg2zegqO7KDtX97RYPA2jvEQ2Jo9bwY1F0-5mCRccERRA9X8A5zLSXa2ANqXbH0pvYhcwuD-0EnuFmQg8FT2GJMmxe9yT2K1WYi0NbKWud3EC-zXROk1ebM8O9zk2ZJpjMspyFGjLd9tZbYCRV42U8OkD7altclcN

Re: [Bug 219421] [patch] handbook jail chapter removing ezjail section

2017-05-21 Thread Trev
bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote on 21/05/2017 03:57: Bug ID: 219421 Summary: [patch] handbook jail chapter removing ezjail > Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Ke