>Number: 188392
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: The releng article contains wrong link to the releng-packages
>article
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date
Synopsis: The releng article contains wrong link to the releng-packages article
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-doc->wblock
Responsible-Changed-By: wblock
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 9 12:37:38 UTC 2014
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188392
_
Howdy folks,
I think there is a mistake in this document:
http://www5.us.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html
In:
- Section 23.6.1 "Overview of Process"
- Procedure 23.2 "Overview of Build World Process"
- Step 9 "Update any remaining configuration files."
the command line given for m
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:06:35AM -0400, Kevin Thompson wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
> I think there is a mistake in this document:
> http://www5.us.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html
>
> In:
> - Section 23.6.1 "Overview of Process"
> - Procedure 23.2 "Overview of Build World Process"
>
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 09:06 -0400, Kevin Thompson wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
> I think there is a mistake in this document:
> http://www5.us.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html
>
> In:
> - Section 23.6.1 "Overview of Process"
> - Procedure 23.2 "Overview of Build World Process"
> - St
>Having the -i and -F options is something I would like to see too, or at
>least offered in a .
Does changing that line to the following make sense? If so, I'll commit it.
# mergemaster -piF
Cheers,
Dru
___
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 06:54 -0700, Dru Lavigne wrote:
>
> >Having the -i and -F options is something I would like to see too, or at
> >least offered in a .
>
>
>
> Does changing that line to the following make sense? If so, I'll commit it.
>
> # mergemaster -piF
No, the second mergemaster com
On 2014-04-09 09:54, Dru Lavigne wrote:
>
>
>> Having the -i and -F options is something I would like to see too, or at
>> least offered in a .
>
>
>
> Does changing that line to the following make sense? If so, I'll commit it.
>
> # mergemaster -piF
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dru
>
> ___
>> >Having the -i and -F options is something I would like to see too, or at
>> >least offered in a .
>>
>>
>>
>> Does changing that line to the following make sense? If so, I'll commit it.
>>
>> # mergemaster -piF
>
>No, the second mergemaster command should not include the -p option.
>
># m
