Joe writes:
> I'd like to point out that neither of these resources are of much help
> for someone trying to figure out what the -p means, though.
That makes sense. What would you suggest as additional text for the
how-to-read-a-security-advisory chapter?
Hi,
I've noticed that the Jails chapter in the Handbook is a bit out of
date. The handbook says one should place the jail_* config options in
the /etc/rc.conf file but this is deprecated. The config options should
now be placed in /etc/jail.conf.
I've created a SVN patch here with an update.
Bes
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 11:20 +, Wout Decr wrote:
> >Number: 186625
> >Category: docs
> >Synopsis: Handbook rebuilding "world" upgrade procedure wrong
> >mergemaster command
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: non-critical
> >Priority: low
> >Responsible:freebs
The following reply was made to PR docs/186625; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wout =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Decr=E9?=
To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: docs/186625: Handbook rebuilding "world" upgrade procedure
wrong mergemaster command
Date: Thu, 27 Feb
For the patch level field, it would be informative to have a note indicating
that the absence of a patch level field is itself information, rather than just
an indication that the user is looking in the wrong place. I think that's
really the critical bit that I was missing.
For example:
...
4
On 2014-02-27 08:50, Wout Decré wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR docs/186625; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Wout =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Decr=E9?=
> To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: docs/186625: Handbook rebuilding "world" upgrade pro
Builds which do not have the -p suffix in their release string do not have a
patch level.
Or maybe it's more accurate to say "If your release string does not contain the
-p suffix, your build is not from the patched security branch"?
I'm sure you know better than I how to state this in a tech
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Joe wrote:
Builds which do not have the -p suffix in their release string do not have a
patch level.
Or maybe it's more accurate to say "If your release string does not contain the -p suffix, your build is not from the patched security branch"?
??
I'm sure you know bett
On 27 Feb 2014, at 19:09, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Joe wrote:
>
>> Builds which do not have the -p suffix in their release string do not have a
>> patch level.
>>
>> Or maybe it's more accurate to say "If your release string does not contain
>> the -p suffix, your build is
It appears your FTP server is handing out bad port assignments for the FTP
traffic.
With filezilla, linux, and other ftp clients I am getting 'Illegal PORT
command' errors.
Putting the connection in passive mode solves the issue.
You might want to look into it.
It appears to only be impacting the
[doc@ BCC'd to exclude from future replies]
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:54:49PM +, Erik Namtvedt wrote:
> It appears your FTP server is handing out bad port assignments for the FTP
> traffic.
> With filezilla, linux, and other ftp clients I am getting 'Illegal PORT
> command' errors.
> Puttin
Hi again,
I've changed my patch a bit since I'm figured it was a bad idea to
remove the "old way" (keeping the jail settings in /etc/rc.conf) since
/etc/jail.conf is rather new (from FreeBSD 9.1 and above).
Included here is my new patch for the jail chapter in the Handbook.
Best regards,
Jack-Be
12 matches
Mail list logo
