Long lines in screen and programlisting elements run off the right side
of the screen with the current CSS.
It would be great to have them wrap and include a visible a line wrap
indicator, but that may not be possible, or may require Javascript.
Better than nothing is to have them at least ha
On 2013.07.28. 19:00, Warren Block wrote:
Long lines in screen and programlisting elements run off the right
side of the screen with the current CSS.
It would be great to have them wrap and include a visible a line wrap
indicator, but that may not be possible, or may require Javascript.
Bett
On 2013.07.28. 19:45, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 19:00, Warren Block wrote:
Long lines in screen and programlisting elements run off the right
side of the screen with the current CSS.
It would be great to have them wrap and include a visible a line wrap
indicator, but that may not b
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 19:45, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 19:00, Warren Block wrote:
Long lines in screen and programlisting elements run off the right side of
the screen with the current CSS.
It would be great to have them wrap and include a visib
On 2013.07.28. 21:17, Warren Block wrote:
This seems to does the XSLT-part, although it may be done in a better
way since it breaks some DocBook features that we don't use:
http://kovesdan.org/patches/xhtml-wrap.diff
Nice! Which DocBook features would be compromised? Are there any
other rea
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 21:17, Warren Block wrote:
This seems to does the XSLT-part, although it may be done in a better way
since it breaks some DocBook features that we don't use:
http://kovesdan.org/patches/xhtml-wrap.diff
Nice! Which DocBook features wo
On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote:
Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to
confuse with content. Syntax highlighting could be useful in places
like the Architecture Handbook, but as you say, we don't have it now.
Would you agree that using this line wrap now
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these
> extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is
> Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java
> for PDF rendering, it would
On 2013.07.28. 22:23, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these
>extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is
>Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:32:12PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2013.07.28. 22:23, Glen Barber wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> >>>I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these
> >>>extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT pr
>Number: 180912
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: [patch][porters-handbook] document gmake/imake in Uses, trim
>kde3
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible:freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Req
Synopsis: [patch][porters-handbook] document gmake/imake in Uses, trim kde3
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-doc->rene
Responsible-Changed-By: rene
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 28 21:50:43 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180912
_
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote:
Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to confuse
with content. Syntax highlighting could be useful in places like the
Architecture Handbook, but as you say, we don't have it now.
On 2013.07.29. 0:09, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote:
Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to
confuse with content. Syntax highlighting could be useful in places
like the Architecture Handbook
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.29. 0:09, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote:
Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to confuse
with content. Syntax highlighting could be use
On 2013.07.29. 0:21, Warren Block wrote:
Do you mean Java is needed to do the linewrap on XHTML, or that it
would be needed to do line numbers and syntax highlighting?
For the latter two only.
Excellent! What do you think about adding it after the doc slush ends
in a week or so?
Good. I
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
On 2013.07.29. 0:21, Warren Block wrote:
Do you mean Java is needed to do the linewrap on XHTML, or that it would
be needed to do line numbers and syntax highlighting?
For the latter two only.
Excellent! What do you think about adding it after
I found it useful, but you need to state a "purpose" section at the top to
explain what the tutorial is for.
--
James Gosnell, ACP
___
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
