On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Václav Zeman wrote:
I am using portsnap to fetch the Ports. Why would it be corrupt? The
"mate" category is there.
My apologies, your initial diagnosis seems correct.
I am confused why we are not seeing automated build failure mail, though;
I thought only some of the aut
On 01/14/2014 06:36 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Václav Zeman wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2014 09:52 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't see a 'mate' category in the ports svn repo.
>>>
>>> Are you perhaps using a patched ports tree on the machine in question,
>>> with a custom
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Václav Zeman wrote:
On 01/13/2014 09:52 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
I don't see a 'mate' category in the ports svn repo.
Are you perhaps using a patched ports tree on the machine in question,
with a custom INDEX corresponding to it?
-Ben Kaduk
Nothing hacked here. The cat
On 01/13/2014 09:52 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Václav Zeman wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I was trying to build the FreeBSD.org web site and I have hit some
>> problems. I had to add this to ports/categories:
>>
>> Index: ports/categories
>> ==
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Václav Zeman wrote:
Hi.
I was trying to build the FreeBSD.org web site and I have hit some
problems. I had to add this to ports/categories:
Index: ports/categories
===
--- ports/categories(revision 43358)
Hi.
I was trying to build the FreeBSD.org web site and I have hit some
problems. I had to add this to ports/categories:
Index: ports/categories
===
--- ports/categories(revision 43358)
+++ ports/categories(working copy)
@@ -4
