Em 02-06-2013 17:03, Warren Block escreveu:
That means "include elements marked with edition="print" and all
unprofiled elements"?
Yes. In other words: exclude elements, whose edition is not print.
For a print version, it might be easier to just go the opposite way:
leave everything unprofile
On 2 June 2013 17:03, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>
>> Em 02-06-2013 15:56, Warren Block escreveu:
There's an XSLT stylesheet provided by DocBook that preprocesses the
markup and only leaves in the corresponding content. This is not enabled by
>>>
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 02-06-2013 00:13, Warren Block escreveu:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 01-06-2013 20:52, Warren Block escreveu:
No objection from me, I just want to bring it up again that handling
these with a single-source solution would be nice,
Em 02-06-2013 00:13, Warren Block escreveu:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 01-06-2013 20:52, Warren Block escreveu:
No objection from me, I just want to bring it up again that
handling these with a single-source solution would be nice, i.e.
using DocBook profiling. It would also
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 01-06-2013 20:52, Warren Block escreveu:
No objection from me, I just want to bring it up again that handling these
with a single-source solution would be nice, i.e. using DocBook profiling.
It would also facilitate merges. This basically consists o
On 1 June 2013 19:39, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Em 01-06-2013 18:26, Eitan Adler escreveu:
>
>> The Preface has a few sections 'Changes from the Edition' which
>> enumerate changes made between print editions of the book. I would
>> like to drop them from the online edition as they offer littl
Em 01-06-2013 20:23, Chris Rees escreveu:
I'm thinking edition="FreeBSD-7" etc. Just a thought, and it's
probably irrelevant, sorry.
Not entirely possible yet but there are plans to support this.
Gabor
___
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
Em 01-06-2013 20:52, Warren Block escreveu:
No objection from me, I just want to bring it up again that handling
these with a single-source solution would be nice, i.e. using DocBook
profiling. It would also facilitate merges. This basically consists
of adding edition="print" to the affected se
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 01-06-2013 18:26, Eitan Adler escreveu:
The Preface has a few sections 'Changes from the Edition' which
enumerate changes made between print editions of the book. I would
like to drop them from the online edition as they offer little value
and
On 1 Jun 2013 18:55, "Gabor Kovesdan" wrote:
>
> Em 01-06-2013 19:46, Chris Rees escreveu:
>
>> I don't see how anyone could disagree with that:)
>>
>> Is there an "old version" capability there?
>
> What do you exactly mean old version capability?
>
> What I'm suggesting consists in that elements
Em 01-06-2013 19:46, Chris Rees escreveu:
I don't see how anyone could disagree with that:)
Is there an "old version" capability there?
What do you exactly mean old version capability?
What I'm suggesting consists in that elements marked as edition="online"
only go to the online version and t
On 1 Jun 2013 18:39, "Gabor Kovesdan" wrote:
>
> Em 01-06-2013 18:26, Eitan Adler escreveu:
>
>> The Preface has a few sections 'Changes from the Edition' which
>> enumerate changes made between print editions of the book. I would
>> like to drop them from the online edition as they offer li
Em 01-06-2013 18:26, Eitan Adler escreveu:
The Preface has a few sections 'Changes from the Edition' which
enumerate changes made between print editions of the book. I would
like to drop them from the online edition as they offer little value
and are right at the start of the handbook ('pri
13 matches
Mail list logo
