Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-09-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 09:36:25 PM Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:27:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >> I suspect it was done out of reasons of being overly conservative in > >> interpreting RLIMIT_STACK. I

Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-09-22 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 22 September 2014 02:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >> Doc people, please review the man page in the patch. > > BTW, mandoc -Tlint is always a useful sanity check; it found: > ./libthr.7:31:5: WARNING: document title should be all caps > ./libthr.7

Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-09-21 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:27:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> I suspect it was done out of reasons of being overly conservative in >> interpreting RLIMIT_STACK. I think it is quite surprising behavior >> though and would rather we make

Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-09-21 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Doc people, please review the man page in the patch. BTW, mandoc -Tlint is always a useful sanity check; it found: ./libthr.7:31:5: WARNING: document title should be all caps ./libthr.7:36:2: WARNING: section header suited to sections 2, 3, and 9

Re: libthr and main thread stack size

2014-09-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:27:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I suspect it was done out of reasons of being overly conservative in > interpreting RLIMIT_STACK. I think it is quite surprising behavior > though and would rather we make your option the default and implement > what the Open Group say