https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249025
w...@psr.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Not A Bug
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249025
--- Comment #2 from w...@psr.com ---
Looks like you're correct and I was wrong. From what I now see in C90, C99,
C++, man strtoul(), etc. the specs call for no meaningful difference between %u
and %d these days in what of the input string i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249025
Hiroki Sato changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249025
w...@psr.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|description of scanf %u |description of scanf %u
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249025
Bug ID: 249025
Summary: description of scanf %u incorrectly says "optionally
signed"
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
