https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Gleb Popov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Flags|maintainer-
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #32 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8107e8e7cb0b549bdc4789a52e69015cd64b7b8d
commit 8107e8e7cb0b549bdc4789a52e69015cd64b7b8d
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #30 from Gleb Popov ---
(In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #29)
Why not also do s|gelf.h|/usr/include/gelf.h| ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #31 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #30)
As pointed in comment: "gelf.h includes so remove it to avoid
conflict between and
=/usr/local/include/libelf.h."
So if I keep /usr/include/gelf.h - I must a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Ivan Rozhuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #247253|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #28 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #27)
I do not care what some persons may say in portmgr@, if this is project
official position - update handbook.
Than it turned off then code always go to "# This
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #27 from Gleb Popov ---
(In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #25)
> Is there any document to proof this?
None I'm aware of, but you can ask portmgr@ about this, they stated it multiple
times.
> See comment #7, it was discusse
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #26 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
(In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #24)
> Building on host is unsupported means that committers are not obliged to make
> sure the port compiles outside of Poudriere. They are as well not requir
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #25 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #24)
> Building on host is unsupported means that committers are not obliged to make
> sure the port compiles outside of Poudriere. They are as well not required to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #24 from Gleb Popov ---
(In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #22)
> 1. Some peoples wont use Poudriere to build ports.
> 2. There is no rule to always use only Poudriere to build ports.
Building on host is unsupported means th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #23 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
But if we approach the question from the other side: does the patch break
anything for those who build glib in poudriere? If not, then I see no reason
not to use it. At least until a more “beautifu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #22 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #21)
1. Some peoples wont use Poudriere to build ports.
2. There is no rule to always use only Poudriere to build ports.
3. Calling a patch a hack is not an argument
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #21 from Gleb Popov ---
If I understand it right, the problem does not manifest itself when building in
Poudriere (in a clean env)? If so, I'd restrain from committing hacks that fix
on-host builds.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #20 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
No matter how it look (it is not tech metric), it work - only this is
important.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #19 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
If the patch didn’t look like such a workaround (hack), then I would have
already committed it as “maintainer timeout”. But at the same time, the current
situation is also not satisfactory. Let's m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #18 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
(In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #4)
This patch prevent silent grab libelf from ports for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #17 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
(In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #12)
Build with your patch:
> Compressing man pages (compress-man)
> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa)
Error: /usr/local/bin/gresource is linked to /
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #16 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #14)
get_option('libelf').allowed() - reads -Dlibelf=disabled and return FALSE.
> Removing the USES=localbase:ldflags works fine for me locally and this way
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Gleb Popov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arr...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #15 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #14 from Baptiste Daroussin ---
this patch does not do the same as -Dlibelf=disabled it probably continues
readying at the elf.h headers due to the use (which seems useless to me here)
of USES=localbase:ldflags
Uses=localbase wi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #13 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #12)
Are you sure that glib will use includes from base libelf with this patch?
As far I understand this patch do same as: -Dlibelf=disabled in makrfile.
--
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #12 from Baptiste Daroussin ---
Created attachment 251937
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=251937&action=edit
patch too stop looking for libelf.pc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #11 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
Just use attached patch :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Vladimir Druzenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |Open
Resolution|Overco
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Vladimir Druzenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #8 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Vladimir Druzenko from comment #7)
It does not.
gio/meson.build:
# Dependencies used by executabl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
Ignore last message - it was without 1st patch of the patch.
But why do you need 2nd part of the patch if 1st part turns off libelf
completely?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Druzenko ---
(In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #5)
[ 84% 503/592] cc -Igio/gresource.p -Igio -I../gio -I. -I.. -Iglib -I../glib
-Igmodule -I../gmodule -Igobject -I../gobject -fdiagnostics-color=never
-D_FILE
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #5 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
(In reply to Vladimir Druzenko from comment #0)
Try this.
I do not disable libelf linking, but force use system libelf.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Ivan Rozhuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #247253||maintainer-approval?
Fl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #3 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273839#c1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Graham Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grahamper...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
--- Comment #2 from Ivan Rozhuk ---
Why not cut this out, like:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=244903&action=diff ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Vladimir Druzenko has asked freebsd-desktop (Team)
for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 273479: devel/glib20: silent grab libelf.so.1 from devel/elfutils
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Vladimir Druzenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||maintainer-feedback?(deskto
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Vladimir Druzenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rozhuk...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273479
Bug ID: 273479
Summary: devel/glib20: silent grab libelf.so.1 from
devel/elfutils
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
37 matches
Mail list logo
