MAKEWORLD fails at texinfo

1999-01-15 Thread eagle
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../lib -I../intl -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -g -O2 -c makeinfo.c makeinfo.c: In function `xrealloc': makeinfo.c:1205: parse error before `void' makeinfo.c:1209: `exit_value' undeclared (first use this function) makeinfo.c:1209: (Each undeclared iden

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Bob Bishop wrote: > World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! > > Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster :-) > I'm running a test build at -j3 now following the reccomended ncpus +1 formula everything looks great so fa

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Bob Bishop wrote: > > > World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! > > > > Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster :-) > > > > I&

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Bob Bishop wrote: > > > > > World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! > > > > > > Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster > > >

Re: EGCS optimizations

1999-04-06 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > There is nothing beyond -O2. Well, there's -O3, which tries to > > inline static functions, but that typically isn't beneficial because > > it really bloats up the code and subroutine calls on

Re: EGCS breaks what(1)

1999-04-06 Thread eagle
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Bruce Evans wrote: > >Alternately, we could jimmy around with the current hack, and prefix it > >with 4 NULs, and see what happened. Sorry, I haven't tested this idea, as > >I've not yet made the EGCS jump. > > egcs aligns long (>= about 28 bytes) strings to 32-byte boundar

Re: something's wrong with the in the last 24 hours with the sources

1999-04-07 Thread eagle
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Tomer Weller wrote: > > doesn't matter how much i attempt to cvsup and make world in the last 24 hours > i get this error, this is after i made world while interducing EGCS to > FreeBSD, > i had to do another make world cuz my C++ compiler couldn't make executables > and th

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-09 Thread eagle
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 p...@phoenix.volant.org wrote: > > I always thought the criteria for inclusion of things into the base > > system was: > > > > 1. Needed for 'make world'; > > 2. Needed to get a basic functioning server up and running; > > 3. Something usefull only within FreeBSD (like th

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-09 Thread eagle
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Rod Taylor wrote: > > Right or wrong, you forgot: > > > > 5. BSD tradition. > > > > Case 5 justifies Fortran. > > > > Me, I'd rather have Fortran as a port. I'd even grudgingly accept > > fortune as a port, as a matter of fact. Our base system is bloated. > > While a lot of

Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system.

1999-04-09 Thread eagle
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: > > > > Whelp... I vote to break tradition. Hack away...The installer takes > > > care of alot of stuff like ports installs. Perhaps different standard > > > setups could be co

Re: does login.conf limitations work ?

1999-04-24 Thread eagle
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Brian Feldman wrote: > On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Stephane Legrand wrote: > > > Andrzej Bialecki writes: > > > On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > i was wondering if the limitations that are supposed to be enforced via > > > > the log

Re: SPAM

1999-05-10 Thread eagle
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care > > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse. > > The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know how.

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-10 Thread eagle
On Tue, 11 May 1999, oZZ!!! wrote: > > Hello! > Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor: > > ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor > cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c > /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn > monitor/main.c > /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c:103: `major' rede

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread eagle
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Steve Kargl wrote: > I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems > to read -current. well it still is broken and i must of missed that patch somewhere in my mail, 3:58 a.m east coast time tuesday 11 rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org wi

Re: Tonight make world failed at isdnmonitor...

1999-05-11 Thread eagle
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > > > > I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems > > > to read -current. > > well it still is broken and i must of missed that patch somewhere in my > > mail, > > > > 3:58 a.m east coast time tuesday 11 > > just read mail, tested

Re: Make World Fails - minor and major conflict

1999-05-11 Thread eagle
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Thomas Dean wrote: > I am running -current SMP as of last week. > > I cvsup'ed last night and started a 'Make -j12 world'. > cvsup again that should fix it. if it doesnt add my or anything else for that matter, to all occurances of the variable minor and major in that fi