Are there any plans to support AMD RAID?
AMD RAID is _like_ Intel RAID, but has a number of differences. One is
that it requires UEFI (without UEFI it does not boot, at least). It comes
on/with AMD motherboards for Zen and Threadripper processors. It also only
supports RAID 0/1/10, that is: no
As someone who controls both ends of the link (runs the ISP, has service
from the ISP), so far (a bit out of laziness) I have the following
solution...
Now... of note is that we statically assign addresses. This is not just
being nice, but being practical. We deal out IPv4 addresses vi IPCP, but
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault
wrote:
> After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new
> issues or unknowns what so ever. Everything that
t, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
> > I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
> > timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
> >
>
> It will be
I'm converting some Xen/Debian/Windows domain servers to
FreeBSD/Bhyve/Samba domain servers. Windows is still required for a couple
of applications, but I've recently had enough success with Samba4 to try
this. Not the problem.
The machines have two disks (was RAID-1 before, will be RAID-1 after)
> Are you using zvols to back the VMs? Make sure they are in 'volmode=dev'
> not 'geom' (the default), or GEOM will lock the device when it detects a
> partition table being written to the zvol (from the installer inside the
> VM)
>
> Note that this setting requires you to export/import the pool or
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2016-09-16 01:04, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Are you using zvols to back the VMs? Make sure they are in
> 'volmode=dev'
> > not 'geom' (the default), or GEOM wi
Is it now possible to boot from iSCSI? I'm not talking about an iSCSI
controller, but with
pxe -> dhcp -> tftp (loads loader) -> (something) -> boot (mounts root from
iSCSI)
... now I recall getting stuck on both "something" and "boot" last time.
AFAICR, loader doesn't understand iSCSI ... so if
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
>
> Does anyone know usage of multi-homing in freebsd, if YES kindly guid me
> how i can test it on my own PC.
>
>
This question seems almost so simple as to be a trick question. By
definition, put two ethernet cards in your FreeBSD computer, g
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
>
>
OK. A better question. About the only caution I can give here (assuming
you don't mean something more interesting like vlans and whatnot) is that
if both IP addresses are
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> i want to have differnet ips`s and each should have different interface,
> it could be a virtual interface. like u can made it like
>
> *ifconfig arge0.1 create*
>
> but each ip should able to access from differnet machine
>
>
This is linux-sp
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Using a 4 position (combined headphone/mic) head set with the T520 and
> *no* device hints WORKS for recording and playback.
>
> Its the onboard microphone that is not working for me. No device hints
> provided in this thread have solved the
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> say a process P1 wants to use the kernel to copy the content of a
> buffer SRC (in its user address space) to a buffer DST (in the
> address space of another process P2), and assume that P1 issues the
> request to the kernel when P2 has alre
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Mike C. wrote:
> On 07/03/13 00:18, John Hixson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:16:19AM +, Mike C. wrote:
> >>
> >> According to the windows drivers info on Acer's page, my laptop internal
> >> SD card reader vendor is "Realtek".
> >>
> >> I'm not being a
Whether you feel it right, or not, net.inet.ip.forwarding must be 1 for gif
to work (even for IPv6).
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Martin Laabs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to set up my raspberry PI as an ipv6 router. As a tunnel broker I
> use sixxs. Now I observed an interesting behavior:
>
> Ev
Just in case it's relevant, I'm carrying around this patch on my fairly
busy little RISC-V machine.
diff --git a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
index 0b8c587a542c..85c0ebd7a10f 100644
--- a/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
+++ b/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clvnops.c
@@ -245
>From the information that was leaked by AMD claiming that their processors
didn't have the flaws, it would seem any OS in which the kernel occupies
the same address space as the userland would be vulnerable. The AMD post
implied that Intel's speculative execution of code did not check the
validit
I've booted that image on my zbook 15. I show in the boot that I can
deliberately load efirt.ko ... and it doesn't help. I also show that I can
"type blind" after the system boots ... so everything but the screen is
working.
In case you can't quite make it out, I hit right cursor twice (move to
ng it? Is the 80x25 text
mode emulated on a bitmapped screen?
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Kyle Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 7:41 PM, David NewHamlet
> > wrote:
> >>
> >&g
If you're thinking on it, you should know that the DVD version works. The
difference, AFAICT, is that it simply calls loader.efi directly. Ie:
bootx64.efi is loader.efi, not boot1.efi.
Loader.efi doesn't seem to change the screen mode when it starts. When the
kernel starts afterwards, this all
As I said I would, I put the contents of /boot onto the FAT-formated EFI
partition. This is suboptimal. The default is to use "kernel.old" ...
etc ... which cannot be done on a FAT partition... at least not with our
filesystem driver ...
... but with all of /boot on the EFI partition, simply st
Hrm. Maybe what I hear others saying, tho, and not entirely being replied
to is just a nice concise document of the why. What I hear you saying is
that GIT has momentum and that it's popular... (and I accept that --- it is
evidently true), but then I hear handwaving about features, but no list of
Actually, frankly, yes. Nearly the first cogent summary I've found so far.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 2:22 AM Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 11:31 PM Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>
>> Hrm. Maybe what I hear others saying, tho, and not entirely being
&g
I'm not posting as someone in-the-know about the state of the FreeBSD stack
--- I trust the security team to divulge things as required,
BUT ...
... the examples of vulnerable things in that article to reference lead me
to conclude that the stacks in question are "libraries" ... likely, but not
n
One thing, that I'm sure the developers know, but that might be
underappreciated at the user level:
These things are little computers ... with their own little operating
systems and as such, their own little bugs. This means that the quality
can swing very wildly between different examples of che
IIRC, isn't the postgresql-server's default install on FreeBSD, from ports,
have TCP turned off? IE: try editing the config (in the database
directory) to uncomment the listen directive?
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 5:21 AM FreeBSD User wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on all(!) of my home systems based on Intel'
Is the NFS mounted filesystem NFS? I've found NFS mounted ZFS has several
pathologies like this when there is no SSD cache and/or log vdevs attached.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:18 PM Felix Palmen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use a -CURRENT bhyve vm for testing port builds with poudriere. As
> this vm
27 matches
Mail list logo
