On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara wrote:
>>
>> I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
>> works on 8_STABLE.
>> But maybe it's not a problem related to the port.
>>
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Barbara wrote:
>
>
>>On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara wrote:
>>>
>>> I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
>>> works on 8_STABLE.
>>> But maybe it's not a problem related to the port.
>>> Just to be clear, I'm not lookin
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara wrote:
>>>
>>> I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
>>> works on 8_STAB
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara wrote:
>
> I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
> works on 8_STABLE.
> But maybe it's not a problem related to the port.
> Just to be clear, I'm not looking for a solution about the port here, I'm just
> wondering why th
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Barbara wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Barbara wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Barbara wrote:
>
> I had a problem running the IcedTea java plugin on CURRENT i386, while it
> works on 8_STABLE.
> But maybe it's not
On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote:
>> With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
>> expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
>>
>> The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose someth
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
>>> me credential.
>>>
>>> I may have filled i
On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Archy Cho wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am very happy to see freebsd could have such network performance with
> netmap ,
> since I am currently using freebsd as core routers instead of cisco.
>
> I tried to re-compile the freebsd 8.2 kernel to test ,
> however , I could not com
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
> FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
> very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
> modified ixgbe driver, which gives
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:27:53AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 06/07/2011 21:11 Nathan Whitehorn said the following:
> > > On 07/06/11 13:00, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >> AFAICT, it is a cpu affinity issue
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 7/20/2011 5:35 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
>
>> While testing some other things, I found -CURRENT from yesterday doesn't
>> work with the em0 in my VirtualBox 4.0.8 (a little out of date
>> admittedly). It worked Friday or Saturday I thin
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/08/2011 17:56 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
>> i asked permission to re@ to integrate it in 9.0 but it was considered
>> a bit premature.
>> However i am not too worried because the system dependencies are
>> minimal and it changes no A
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/08/2011 18:23 Vlad Galu said the following:
>> Netmap's scope may be narrow, but it's a great alternative to
>> proprietary implementations that are provided by only a handful of
>> vendors and tied to thei
13 matches
Mail list logo
