make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
reboot
mergemaster -p
make installworld -> attached
MYKERNEL=GENERIC+
options VIMAGE
options ROUTETABLES=2
Anything else that maybe helpful?
Ultima
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
It builds fine, the issue is installing it. I think the panic is zfs
related not actually installworld.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
> > reboot
> > mergemaster -p
> > make installworld -> attached
> >
> > MYKERNEL=GENERIC+
>
https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better, sorry I didn't
know it would get stripped.
Ultima
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Ultima wrote:
> https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better, sorry I
> didn't know it would get stripped.
>
>
at 2:59 PM, Ultima wrote:
> https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better, sorry I
> didn't know it would get stripped.
>
> Ultima
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Ultima wrote:
>
>> https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better,
Apologies, this should have been in my initial reply.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201340
or here for attachment
https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=165694
I haven't actually had a chance to do anything after upgrading
from stable other than see the corrupte
only visually as commands still worked,
just showed a blank black screen.
Also unloading the kernel modules for
nvidia and nvidia-modeset (new as of 358.16ish) did
not free the memory.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Ultima wrote:
> Apologies, this should have been in my initial re
Wow that is insane. I'm going to start looking for the
revision this behavior started. If you already found it,
or find it before I report back plz let me know so I
don't waste my time =]
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 02/ 3/16 10:54 AM, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>
>> I
This is actually triggered when using large blocks.
"recordsize=1M"
going back to 128k and I no longer panic.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Hans Petter Selasky
> wrote:
> > On 02/11/16 15:00, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> >>
> >> plugging in
#x27;Intel Corporation'
device = 'X540 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
ppt26@pci0:129:0:185: class=0x02 card=0x1458 chip=0x15158086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Cor
options=21
media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T )
status: active
groups: epair
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Eric Joyner wrote:
> Did you do an ifconfig up on ix1 before loading the VF driver?
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM Ultima wrote:
>
>> Decided to do some testing with
This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E <
jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have?
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-curr...@free
Yeah, dmesg does show 48. 12 Cores and 24 threads each. 48 total
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU?
>
>
> On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote:
>
>> This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2
>>
er received.
I'v already double checked VT-d, but I'll make it tripple! =] I can't reset
the system right now, but ill send an update when possible with only 2 vf's
and unmodified generic.
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Eric Joyner wrote:
> I don't really h
in bios likely played a role in this.
If you have any ideas, I'm willing to test them.
Thanks! =]
VT-d screen: https://puu.sh/niyiq/4fee92e4a3.jpgn
PCI advanced options: https://puu.sh/niyjg/88e71e48d9.jpgn
Ultima
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Ultima wrote:
> I forgot to mention
t think I listed the motherboards in question yet so ill list them
now.
S1200BTLRM -
http://ark.intel.com/products/69633/Intel-Server-Board-S1200BTLRM?q=S1200BTLRM
MD80-TM0 - http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5146#ov
I'm not sure if it will be
F driver?
>
> I've tried SR-IOV on a system here, and I can confirm that traffic stops
> passing on the PF interface when you create a VF interface. That didn't
> used to happen, so I'm investigating why that is right now.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:09 AM Ultima wrot
Hello chris,
d_thread_t was a compatible shim to support FreeBSD 4. It was removed in
current some time ago, changing to struct thread should fix this error.
Ultima
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Chris H wrote:
> Greetings, all.
> Apologies in advance, if this is better suited for
>
if you're still interested in this, but did you do "kenv
> hw.vmm.force_iommu=1" before loading the vmm module? I think that might be
> necessary.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 PM Ultima wrote:
>
>> Yeah, still getting the -100 error, I do have sendmail disable
Zfs automatically creates directories needed to be mounted, it would be a
wasted effort making directories for zfs. I don't really understand your
issue with an unused /usr dataset, but you can just modify
the ZFSBOOT_DATASETS area of the script to get accomplish what you're
trying to do.
On Wed,
No need to ignore the output of zfs list, here is an explanation of zfs
list's output, this is in the zfs man page. I think you're confusing used
with refer.
used
The amount of space consumed by this dataset and all its
descendents.
This is the value that is checked against this
regression
on recent commit?
Previously was running (sorry had git src at the time) 8b372d1(master)
built around a week ago. Any ideas what maybe causing this? I can provide
more details if needed, someone in irc also mentioned noticing a hit in
performance.
Ultima
now.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 03/11/2016 18:49, Ultima wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance.
> This
> > system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has m
Should I restart and provide this info after 20min into build? Or is this
good info?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ultima wrote:
> last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07up 1+05:19:23
> 18:52:47
> 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleeping
> CPU: 24.4% user
Just upgraded again to r296709. Running for about an hour, performance
appears to be restored. Will report back if this changes.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Ultima wrote:
> Hmm, the total cost would be hard to calculate, not all of it was
> purchased at the same time.
>
> CPU -
Upgrade your source and reinstall, this issue was fixed sometime around
r296377.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Baho Utot
wrote:
> Current-11 is slower than FreeBSD-10.2 on my dell lapfart
>
> I fetched and complied current-11 r296326 following the handbook.
> I used a custom kernel config, m
Having this long timeout issue occur many times during the day. Normally
not this bad, currently on r297060 amd64. A few hours ago had a system hang
that lasted for about 1-2 hours.(not sure how long exactly, gave up
waiting) It occured after a zfs destroy operation and affected sshd. (could
no l
returned 5
ixv0: at device 0.129 on pci12
ixv0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors
ixv0: ixgbe_reset_hw() failed with error -100
device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Ultima wrote:
> I have been interested in this when I first read about it in 2012. =]
>
ut error
# dmesg
ixv0: at device 0.129 numa-domain 1 on pci12
ixv0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors
ixv0: ixgbe_reset_hw() failed with error -100
device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5
# cat /etc/iovctl.conf
PF {
device : ix1;
num_vfs : 31;
}
DEFAULT {
passthrough : true;
}
Jeb,
Okay, just wanted to make sure it was known. =]
Ultima
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:36 PM, cramerj wrote:
> Yeah, we're running into some issues with our implementation. I'm working
> on the VF driver now and hope to get some of these bugs fixed within the
> next coupl
If multiple kernels are being installed like this, eg KERNCONF="FOO BAR",
which of the two would be default during boot? FOO because it came first?
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, May 07, 2016 06:50:05 AM David Wolfskill wrote:
> > [Recipient list trimmed a bit
I'v mentioned this in the past, but I just want to verify. Will 11 be
released with the virtual function driver unusable? Currently iovctl will
only work in pass-through mode.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
d.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2016-March/060350.html
Just opened PR211062 for it.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211062
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote:
>
> > On Jul 12, 2016, at 11:21, Ultima wrote:
> >
> > I'v mentioned this in the
Is this actually required? Instead of the extra steps, how about just
moving/creating each dataset into each BE (or at least the ones desired)
and setting them to mountpoint=inherit. With zfs_enable="YES" this should
mount the dataset appropriately. Only the root BE should need
canmount=noauto beca
If anyone is interested, as Michelle Sullivan just mentioned. One problem I
found when looking for an HBA is that they are not so easy to find. Scoured
the internet for a backup HBA I came across these -
http://www.avagotech.com/products/server-storage/host-bus-adapters/#tab-12Gb1
Can only speak f
16
root@S1:/usr/src/head/obj/usr/src/head/src/sys/MYKERNEL-NODEBUG
amd64
Sorry for the wall of text, but I hope this helps in tracking down this
possible bug.
Ultima
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
SD
11+ it will fail to start with...
2016-08-06 17:07:27.946432|CRITICAL|ServerLibPriv | |Server()
DatabaseError out of memory
Ultima
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe,
all datasets.
So to be clear, this is expected behavior with atime=off + TXGs during
offline time? I had thought that the resilver after onlining the disk would
bring that disk up-to-date with the pool. I guess my understanding was a
bit off.
Ultima
__
ctive self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2016-08-04 07:22, Ultima wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently had some issue with a PSU and ran several scrubs on a pool
> with
> > aroun
Hello, I'm dealing with an odd issue with an rc script working pre-11. The
change that is causing the prog to fail seems to be the new limits feature,
$name_login_class. After commenting out the limits command in rc.subr, the
script starts as expected. Adding limits directly in the rc script with
thing obvious? zpool
labelclear is also providing a similar error. The -f options are not
helping.
Any ideas what my issue maybe? The error suggests it is currently active on
the pool, however the offline should have changed that status correct?
Ultima
inal post. It is
providing similar output as the replace command.
As the device is offline from the pool. Is this the correct behavior to
show being an (ACTIVE) member of the pool? After wiping the correct area on
the disk via dd, the replace successfully added the drive back to the pool!
Thanks for
This patch looks good its too bad the core hasn't looked at it yet. Ill do
some testing and report any issues found. Some points you bring up in the
bug are quite valid. Thanks for working on this! =]
Ultima
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Ganael LAPLANCHE
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 20
I'v been noticing lately sluggish performance, maybe zfs? First noticed
this a few days ago right after upgrading on Jan 7th to r311648 and the
last upgrade before that was around dec 30-jan 1 (not sure of rev). Decided
to upgrade again today. I usually build and install head every week or two,
but
17 at 9:03 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 15:32, Ultima wrote:
>
>> I'v been noticing lately sluggish performance, maybe zfs? First noticed
>> this a few days ago right after upgrading on Jan 7th to r311648 and the
>> last upgrade before that was around dec
Currently there is a bug with zvols. I have a few Bhyve containers that
startup at boot. I'v noticed in middle December of last year that after a
restart the zvols become inaccessible to the container. Nothing can be done
to the zvol, other than rename. It cannot even be destroyed in this state.
Th
The volmode was set to default, which is geom. Setting to 2, dev fixes the
issue! thanks Allan for the speedy solution!
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2017-01-16 12:59, Ultima wrote:
> > Currently there is a bug with zvols. I have a few Bhyve containers that
&g
I have been affected by this issue as well, just updated to r312388 and it
is fixed. Thanks
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:29 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 01:46:31 PM Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> > On Fri, January 13, 2017 22:46, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> > > On Fri, January 13,
If you plan on running a desktop environment like this make sure its super
speed usb 3.0 or the system will be considerably slow. This is a perfect
backup plan and I always have one for the ready. This is especially
important when on current. I don't think you have to worry so much about
having a s
I recently moved some data on a box with limited space. I decided I should
limit the snapshots so that space would not become an issue. I just check
back a week later to find out the box is hitting the borderline. Doing I
quick check I realized that the snapshot_limit is not being respected.
# una
hat I checked the dataset and it
is showing no permissions granted to a user. So I guess user in this case
is also including the root user, but how does one lock the property from
root? I keep going through the manpage looking for something I may have
missed but keep coming up empty.
Thanks for repl
Yes just tested this and it is how it works.
Thanks for the explanation.
Ultima
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-uns
Its showing...
elf64_loadimage: read failed
can't load file /boot/kernel/kernel
Can the same when attempting to load kernel.old, had to revert to old
snapshot on usb rescue.
This is not a hardware problem.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Gu
Just recently tested smartctl (a few days ago) r324135 and I
found that the auto detection seems to be broken but manually
selecting the device type works. Are you positive you tested
every device type?
I was a bit surprised to find that atacam works for my onboard
controller and the HBA only work
Was a bit tired last night and just wanted to make sure this issue was
known. Upgraded to r324957 and everything works! yay!
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any m
Eh... disregard my last message, the mount works properly but
the mount is stuck in a hard lock state.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-curren
Try updating? just upgraded to r327991 and it was smooth sailing.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:42 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> One of our CURRENT boxes is repeateadly disobeying to build "buildworld"
> (make
> buildkernel seems to work as I did several kernels right now).
>
> The hosts's world is as o
Hello Jeff,
Few days ago I upgraded my system firmware, upgraded
base to r327991 and altered snooping to
cluster-on-die. Its hard to say what is making
the server feels like a completely system due
to all these changes (also running llvm 6.0),
but I am betting it is the NUMA optimizations.
It is s
Hello,
This is probably a driver issue. The only way I could get sr-iov
working with the ix driver is compiling the driver provided
by Intel and loading it before boot. [1] for more details and [2]
for the driver. Have not tested the latest version and only
tested this on CURRENT. Also, there were
Hey Larry,
It is possible it's the motherboard itself, but it's rare. The way I
would determine this is to swap the DIMM module with another
populated slot on the motherboard and see if the error migrated
to the new slot or not. Also, this error doesn't necessarily mean
there is a problem that ne
s:
> Memory read ECC error
> Memory corrected error count (CORE_ERR_CNT): 1
> Memory transaction Tracker ID (RTId): 46
> Memory DIMM ID of error: 0
> Memory channel ID of error: 1
> Memory ECC syndrome: ac298902
> STATUS 8c41009f MCGSTATUS 0
> MCGCAP 1c09 APICID 34 S
the motherboard model? Also, do you
have multiple CPUs installed in this system?
Best regards,
Richard Gallamore
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:41 PM Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Yes and Yes.
>
>
> On 06/20/2022 7:37 pm, Ultima wrote:
>
> Are you sure that the module you replaced it wi
; > 2 Processors, 6-core/12-Thread. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
> > > E5645 @ 2.40GHz (2400.20-MHz K8-class CPU)
> > >
> > > I'll bring it down and swap DIMMS around
> > >
> > > On 06/20/2022 7:57 pm, Ultima wrote:
> > >
> > > H
62 matches
Mail list logo
