onnectors.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering 831-459-5354
UC Santa Cruz Baskin En
c.conf, I have:
ifconfig_bce0="1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.252.0"
ifconfig_bce0_alias0="1.2.3.5 netmask 255.255.255.255"
but when the machine reboots, it only gets its primary IP address.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
x27;ve added
the "inet" prefix to both lines and it is working. Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering
ot of namespace
> pollution involved.
Thanks! I've just installed the binary package for now which is working.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineerin
dmesg now:
mps0: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem
0xef5f-0xef5f,0xef58-0xef5b irq 44 at device 0.0 on pci1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin Schoo
l 28
version had the new driver on it?
At any rate, 9 is working for now, except for the net-snmp compilation problem
which I got around by using the binary package.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafson
64, nmount), rip = 0x800ab4dfc, rsp =
0x7fffccc8, rbp = 0x801009048 ---
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering
-
So, is this an OS/driver issue? Is it a bad controller? Bad cables? Bad
disks?
As always, any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafson
[ITHREAD]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering 831-459-5354
UC Santa Cruz Baskin Enginee
cards out there as well. Would upgrading the card help
any? The LSI SAS 9205-8e seems to be a workable solution, and not too
expensive.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc
ng it more because of Soracle's
abandonment of various projects. We're primarily using them for bulk storage -
most of them are ZFS with multi-terabyte ZFS file systems - but I've got one
that's a workhorse for web and other such things.
-=-=-=-
least for a time, in 3 or 4 weeks. We have
hardware on order that I can use to test with for a short while before it goes
into production.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont.
one have any recommendation for or against the 9200-8e?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering
s giving us trouble right now.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tim Gustafsont...@soe.ucsc.edu
Baskin School of Engineering 831-459-5354
UC Santa Cruz
14 matches
Mail list logo