Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-11-27 Thread Nakata Maho
Hmm thanks for discussion. I'll install and test FBSD 10 in this weekend. thanks Nakata Maho From: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:43:02 -0800 > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Nakata Maho
Hi all Does anybody please commit the patch? My FreeBSD machine is down due to power outage for next week. Also I'll be very busy in the next week. Best, Nakata Maho From: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 >

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Nakata Maho
Many thanks! From: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:47:23 +0100 > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >> I see the octave port is still broken. >> >> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed port