Is there any support of nVidia's nForce2 integrated LAN
controller?
Also I have following message during device probe:
pcm0: measured ac97 link rate at 292571428 Hz
mpg123 appears to play MP3s correctly.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I CVSup'd February 24... In addition I want to say that measured
ac97 link rate may be 51200 or more that 6 (about 69300 as
I can remember)
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, David O&
if_xl.c is 1.129
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:09:11PM +0600, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
>> Is there any support of nVidia's nFo
Windows XP says that it's NVIDIA nForce MCP Networking Controller, if it
can help.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:09:11PM +0600, Maxim M. K
ore info
>
>Should I worry about that? Rebuild KDE?
>
>--
>Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kukulies (at) rwth-aachen.de
I have similar message with licq-qt-gui, so I suspect qt-3.2.1 library. I
use GNOME 2.4, so licq-qt-gui is just one thing that uses qt. qt is used
by KDE mostly
s
MCP-T, while NF7 and NF7-M (with integrated video) uses MCP, which, in
oppose to MCP-T have no interface to second network card (based on 3COM's
chip), have no IEEE-1394A (aka Firewire) and have no SoundStorm
Technology. Realtek's ALC650, that is used on that motherboards is capable
to swi
loss due dynamic /bin/sh linking, ENTIRE FreeBSD community will have
troubles (at least with NSS) due to static linking...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, David Wolfskill wrote:
>>Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:34:08 +0600 (NOVT)
>>From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> So, imagine, i'm accidentally deleted /bin with your most wanted
>>static sh... And, of course,
ve CD, or use sysinstall from the installation CD to install
>a package. I don't see fetch as a requirement for diskless clients.
>
Not diskless clients, but ruined FreeBSD installation. IMHO
/rescue is created for it. We shouldn't put fetch into /bin, but placing
fetch in
ED FreeBSD from ashes... As /rescue/mount_cd9660, or
mount_msdosfs... In other words we can drom mount_msdosfs from /rescue
just because almost everybody can burn CD... We will save a few KBytes of
space (that isn't really needed on modern disks), but we will loose
functionality... For me, having /
orward, and the payment
of new features is awesome performance of OLD, not so good profiled (due
statical linking) dynamic linking functions. "if it isn't broken - don't
fix it". But if you don't use dynamic linking - it's DEFINITELY NOT
broken. And will never be f
__
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
Perhaps we just need to place "wrapper" startup script, that will
try to start "real" startup script
inks that Billy will test dynamic
linking in CURRENT and the performance will be OK... Maybe he will... But
OS will became Microsoft (R) FreeBSD (TM) then... IMHO... If we want to
reduce dynamic linking penalty - we MUST to do it... Go forward, testing
and fixing things, that gives us perfo
wrapper is needed to run script startx by ordinary user, not root... Seems
like gdm works well for me without wrapper.
Shall we need to make XFree86-4.3.0,1 an option to install without wrapper
package?
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
You can forcibly delete wrapper package, and the do pkgdb -F and delete
dependency on it... Only XFree metaport is depends on it.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, CARTER Anthony wrote:
>I realise what wrap
It depends on GNOME version... GNOME-1.4.something installs gdm that is
started by init... GNOME-2.2.0 installs gdm that is supposed to start via
/usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d/gdm.sh...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003
What your server do when it panics? It tries to detect disks?
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Ventsislav Velkov wrote:
>I could not boot in single user mode with the 5.0 kernel because it brokes.
>Do yo
Looks like someone broke AC97 rate measurement in -CURRENT
-STABLE measures AC97 rate well (about 55900). Current gives about
41000...
Hardware is Compaq EXD C600 (-STABLE) and Compaq iPAQ C700 (-CURRENT)
Both are i815 equipped with SoundMAX AC97 codec...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
Building of x11-fonts/webfonts gives this message:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2580: warning: duplicate script for
target "patch-message" ignored
Which breaks portupgrade
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
/sys/modules/ibsc2 wants opt_mac.h which isn't in the tree...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
make warning
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2580: warning: duplicate script for
target "patch-message" ignored
breaks portupgrade of several ports
portupgrade says that Makefile broken on these ports
(I'm not subscribed to freebsd-ports so reply direct, pleas
ws a lot of
warnings about duplicates.
This only affects -CURRENT, -STABLE doesn't have this error message. So
I'm afraid that it's related to -CURRENT...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Looks like nobody else expirienced this problem
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
> portupgrade fails with reason (Makefile broken) on print/jadetex
>and x11-fonts/webfonts
Tekram DC 390 works under sym(4)... Except 390T which is powered by AMD...
Cliff Sarginson:
Perhaps you need try to play with disk geometry in fdisk... Try to see
what geometry is 1st disk and try set something same on 2nd.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
It dies on the depend stage, if -DNOPROFILE is used... It needs
pam_misc.h on usr.bin/su then.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
5.0-CURRENT have no MAKEDEV shell script anymore. Instead it have working
devfs...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I've installed qt23 from ports painlessly
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
solved
Feb 22th) So, I was unable to compile -CURRENT after CVSup at Mar 6th
(libpam issue), then was unable to run it (crypt_md5 bug). I was able to
make -CURRENT up multiuser at Mar 11th, then deleted ALL packages and
rebuilded from scratch...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL
But it seems that it have same problems... And looks that
there are no true AMD chipset motherboard...
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
29 matches
Mail list logo
