On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Dmitry Krivenok
wrote:
> Hello All!
> I recently updated to r212634 and tried to build CURRENT tree with ccache.
>
> However, I got build error:
>
>
>
> Stop in /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Is it a know issue?
> Any solutions?
If I remember c
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Dmitry Krivenok
wrote:
> Your patch works fine for me, thanks!
> However, I don't see any performance gain when using ccache:
>
> Number of cache hits is very low.
> I need to understand this...
Make sure you have the following environment variables set:
CCACHE_H
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated
>> via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup
>>
>> *default release=cvs tag=RE
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec
> wri
> tes:
>>Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk
>>(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning:
>>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message
>
> , Maxim Khitrov writes:
>
>>Interesting... But [...]
>
> A "But" which I read to mean "Nahh, too hard, lets just hack it..."
>
> I don't agree with that, we should do
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Matthias Andree
wrote:
> Am 27.12.2011 22:53, schrieb David Thiel:
>> I've had multiple machines now (9.0-RC3, amd64, i386 and earlier
>> 9-CURRENT on ppc) running SU+J that have had unexplained panics and
>> crashes start happening relating to disk I/O. When I en
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 02:11:32PM -, Paul Webster wrote:
> P> I only really need one question answered in honesty;
> P>
> P> I personally think that by forking our own version of PF we have
> P> essentially made something to
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:18:54PM +0100, krad wrote:
>> all of that is true, but you are missing the point. Having two versions of
>> pf on the bsd's at the user level, is a bad thing. It confuses people,
>> which puts them off. Its a classic
