Title: PXE build?
Does anyone know of any current issues with PXE? I've searched the mailing lists and I don't see any mention of a problem similar to mine.
I'm running FreeBSD-CURRENT from 2000 09 15 on a server. The client has an Intel 21143 based ethernet card that claims it has PXE 2.0
Title: Bug Fix for SYSV semaphores.
I noticed that sysv semaphores initialize the otime member of the semid_ds structure to 0, but they never update it afterwards. This field is supposed to be the last operation time. ie the last time a semctl was done. In UNIX Network Programming, Stevens
Title: Broken mmap in current?
I have written a character device driver for a proprietary PCI device that has a large sum of mapable memory. The character device supports mmap() which I use to export the memory into a user process. I have no problems accessing the memory on this device, but
unlock. I will investigate further and post a pr though.
Thanks for your help!
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 8:52 PM
To: Jeff Roberson
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Broken mmap in current?
On Th
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
unclean shutdown. SUJ may be enabled with tunefs -j enable and disabled
wi
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Jeff Roberson escreveu:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Gary Jennejohn
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
First, many thanks for this effort, it is really very appreciated,
Panic on Gnome starting:
Thank you for the report with stack. That was very helpful. I know how
to fix this bug but it will take me a day or two as my primary test
mac
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thank you for your effort in implementing the soft update journaling.
I tried to test SUJ on a provider with 4 kB block size. My system runs
9-CURRENT r207195 (i386).
Unfortunately, tunefs is unable to cope with the device. It can easily
repr
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:57:59 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2010 19:47:00 Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote:
On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery table.
** Resolving u
Hello,
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the following
bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
1) panic on gnome start via softdep_cancel_link().
2) Difficulty setting flags on /. This can only be done from a direct
boot into single user but there were
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the
following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
I've started seeing a panic "Sleeping thread
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Before sending the 'bad' part i would like to say that it is very useful and
save me a lot of time after a crash.
I've updated the ports and there was no more space on the FS.
It end up with this backtrace (After one reboot the kernel
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
This is a problem with snapshots and the journal full condition. I will
address it shortly.
Thanks,
Jeff
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
...
#0 0xc056b93c in doadump ()
(
I'm about to commit code that will make one of :
options SCHED_4BSD
or
options SCHED_ULE
mandatory. This will go in a few hours from now. I will update all of
the standard config files to account for this change. SCHED_4BSD selects
the old scheduler in case you're wondering. Failure to spec
Ok, this has been commited. Expect build breakage if you don't add one of
these options or use GENERIC.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I'm about to commit code that will make one of :
>
> options SCHED_4BSD
>
> or
>
> options SCHED_ULE
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty
> > > serious bug:
> > >
> > > PID USERNAME PRI
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> *Grump* I can't get my boxes to stay up more than a few
> minutes..evidently this code was not tested prior to commit.
>
> So much for getting work done on the package cluster today.
>
It was tested. I ran it on my desktop and did several buildworlds o
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > It was tested. I ran it on my desktop and did several buildworlds on an
> > smp machine. I should have let it kick around for a bit longer than a few
> > days, I agree. I will commit the fix in just a moment.
>
> Thanks!
>
Yeah, I really am sorry
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I gave ULE another try just now, following your recent commits, and
> I'm seeing even worse problems:
>
> At boot time when the X server is loading, disk activity occurs
> briefly about once every 2 seconds; the mouse is active briefly at the
> same time
Please try this:
Index: nfs_vnops.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c,v
retrieving revision 1.195
diff -u -r1.195 nfs_vnops.c
--- nfs_vnops.c 25 Feb 2003 03:37:47 - 1.195
+++ nfs_vnops.c 25 Feb 2003 08:31:
This patch worked.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> Please try this:
> Index: nfs_vnops.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.195
> diff -u -
I have a patch that should clear up buf locking issues and race conditions
in vfs_cluster.c. Since this code is so tricky I'd like to have a few
people test it. You should notice no difference in your system
performance or behavior.
Please see: http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/cluster.diff
Found a bug. Please update your source from the same location if you
previously applied this patch.
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I have a patch that should clear up buf locking issues and race conditions
> in vfs_cluster.c. Since this code is so tricky I'd like to
I'm using SCHED_ULE on my laptop now. My recent round of fixes seems to
have helped out. I'm getting good interactive performance. I'm doing the
following:
nice -5'd for (;;) {} process.
make -j4 buildworld
Mozilla, pine, irc, screen, vi, etc.
All interactive tasks are very responsive. My ni
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The indication of this is that the g_bio zone does not return to
> > zero USED as it should.
>
> It looks like z->uz_cachefree is slightly out of date (updated in
> zone_timout() every 20th second) and often too low (not taking the
> z->uz_full_buck
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >Adam Migus writes:
> > > Folks,
> > > While doing some performance analysis (doing make -j5 buildkernel)
> > > on a set of 14 kernels I've hit one using the SCHED_ULE scheduler
> > > that hangs. It happens every time but not n
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:28:10AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > got a panic on my server tonight. Coredump available
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a panic on my server tonight. Coredump available for further debuggung.
>
> FreeBSD haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #6: Thu Aug
> 28 00:16:19 CEST 2003
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LORIEN i38
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a panic with a kernel from sources around September 1st, 8pm.
>
> Dump and debugging kernel available for further debugging.
> cg@ got the same panic on his machine.
>
This is probably my fault. I will look into it tonight. Until then
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:53:43 +0200
> > From: Jan Srzednicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 07:53:48PM +0300, Lefteris Chatzibarbas wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a problem with kernels, buil
I found the bug that I introduced around the 29th of august. It is fixed
in ffs_softdep.c rev 1.143. Truely, most of the leg work was done by
tegge. I just produced and tested a patch. This completes a buildworld
with 128M of memory now, whereas before it just completed with 64m and
512m. perh
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Florian C. Smeets wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I get this panic on a system with kernel/world from 03 September.
> Usually i only run X and xawtv on that system but when i wanted to make
> world today i got the panic:
>
This was fixed recently. Can you cvsup and rebuild?
> Kris Kennawa
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I was wondering about the status of the ULE scheduler. Is it very
> > experimental still or is it reasonably suitable for everyday (i.e.
> > non-mission-crit
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE.
> > > However, the mouse will get sluggi
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Sunday 28 September 2003 14:38, Matt wrote:
> > Morten Rodal wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:26:24PM +0100, Matt wrote:
> > >>Morten Rodal wrote:
> > >>>On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> [...]
> > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading complicated pages in
> > > Mozilla Firebird, and
There seems to have been some regression in the interactivity of
SCHED_ULE since I was last measuring it. I'll send a follow up mail when
I have found and fixed the issue.
Thanks,
Jeff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I'm working on getting the AFS client to work under FreeBSD. I just
> compiled a -current kernel with DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS, and before I could
> even load the AFS module I had the system stop with the following
> locking assertion:
>
> getdirtybuf: 0xc26780
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Evan Dower wrote:
> I ran with SCHED_ULE for a couple days recently and had trouble beyond just
> sluggishness. When doing really intensive tasks such as buildworld or
> installworld, the computer would actually stall. The first time was
> immediately after booting single user
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2003/10/09 00:28), Scott Sipe wrote:
>
> > Anything that seems disk intensive: bzip2 (unbzip2ing one big file makes
> > this happen), making world, building ports, etc makes my X environment
> > practically unusable. Mouse stutters, reaction times is
I have reproduced the lagging mouse issue on my laptop. I tried moused to
no effect. Eventually, I grudgingly installed kde and immediately started
encountering problems with mouse lag. It would seem that twm was not
stressing my machine in the same ways that kde is. ;-)
I suspect a problem wit
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Brendon and Wendy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just saw the talk about sched_ule, nvidia driver, moused and pauses...
>
> I was running -current up until about a month ago, using the nvidia
> driver, sched_bsd on a dual ht xeon, with htt disabled. Mouse
> interactivity with moused was ter
I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under
some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running
afterwards.
I'm going to look into the reports of some problems with nice, although I
suspect that they could have been caused by the same issues.
HTT is
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Oliver Fischer wrote:
> My notebook was a little bit "panic" this night. After rebooting I found
> this message in my system log:
>
> panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps
>
> ?
When are your sources from?
>
> Regards,
>
> Oliver Fischer
>
> _
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Sunday 12 October 2003 23:21, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under
> > some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running
> > afterwards.
&
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2003 21:27, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 October 2003 23:21, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > > I commited a fix that would have cau
I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
stopped it from working very well.
Things should be much improved. Feedback, as always, is welcome. I'd
like to look into making this the default scheduler f
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> > Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >
> >> I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
> >> outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
>
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
> > outside of Giant. ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
> > stopped it from working very wel
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> >>
> >>>Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I fixed two
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> I just cvsupped and installed a new world and kernel (previous kernel was from
> October 13), and now my machine gets a page fault when I try to run any GTK2
> application (Firebird, Gnome 2). Are others seeing this as well?
>
> Arjan
If you're run
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Valentin Chopov wrote:
> I'm getting an error in the sched_ule.c
>
> It looks that sched_add is called with "struct kse" arg. instead of
> "struct thread"
Fixed, thanks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Val
>
>
> cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
> -W
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It
> is not even competitive in my simple tests.
[scripts results deleted]
>
> Summary: SCHED_ULE was more than twice as slow as SCHED_4BSD for the
> obj and depend stages. These stages
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > > How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It
> > > is not even competitive in my simple tests
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > I think you cvsup'd at a bad time. I fixed a bug that would have
> > caused the system to lock up in this case late last night. On my
> > system it freezes for a few seconds and then returns. I can stop
> > that by turning down the interactivity
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > > How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It
> > > is not even competitive in my simple tests
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
> On Monday 27 October 2003 12:06 pm, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just cvsupped and built a new kernel that includes sched_ule.c 1.67. I'm
> > getting a page fault when working in Mozilla Firebird. It happens pretty
> > soon, after openi
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Test for scheduling buildworlds:
> >
> > cd /usr/src/usr.bin
> > for i in obj depend all
> > do
> > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i
> > done >/tmp/zqz 2>&1
> >
> > (Run this with an empty /somewhere/obj.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > > Test for scheduling buildworlds:
> > >
> > > cd /usr/src/usr.bin
> > > for i in obj depend all
> > > do
> > > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Bruno Van Den Bossche wrote:
> Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Test for scheduling b
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Michal wrote:
> FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Oct 30 17:49:13 EST 2003
> When kernel compiled with SCHED_ULE, USB mouse (MS USB Intellimouse) is
> almost unusable. Even if CPU is idle, mouse feels sticky. When loading
> mozilla or compiling comething mouse freezes for several s
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > I have commited my SMP fixes. I would appreciate it if you could post
> > update results. ULE now outperforms 4BSD in a single threaded kernel
> > compile and performs almost iden
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Schnoopay wrote:
> >> Are you using moused? Is this SMP or UP? What CPUs are you using?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> >
> > I am having similar problems after my last cvsup (10-31-03) also using a
> > USB MS Intellimouse. Mouse is slow to respond under ULE but fine unde
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> > You commented on the nice cutoff before. What do you believe the correct
> > behavior is? In ULE I went to great lengths to be certain that I emulated
> > the old behavior of denyin
do you run?
Thanks for the report.
Cheers,
Jeff
>
> If you need me to do anything to track this down, let me know. I am, and
> have always been, running with moused, on a uniprocessor box (ThinkPad
> T21 1ghz p3).
>
> Best regards,
> /Eirik
>
> Jeff Roberson wrote:
&g
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2003/11/04 09:29), Eirik Oeverby wrote:
>
> > The problem is two parts: The mouse tends to 'lock up' for brief moments
> > when the system is under load, in particular during heavy UI operations
> > or when doing compile jobs and such.
> > The second
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> Alex Wilkinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:27:04AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> >
> > Just for those interested:
> > I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when
> > my mouse goes haywire. And it's an a
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> > Just for those interested:
> > I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when
> > my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and
> > forth 8 times) that it *only* happens with SCHE
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, David Xu wrote:
> Jun Su wrote:
>
> >I noticed that Jeff Roberson implement this already. Is whi will be commit?
> >http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1531
> >
> >I google this because I found this feature is listed in the list of Kerne
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:
> >
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Well, I don't have any measurem
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 13 November 2003 06:01 pm, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>
> > I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background
> > but I see every new object file in form of a pi
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 14 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> >
> > This does not happen with SCHED_4BSD? How fast is your system? Can you
> > give me an ex
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 6:20 PM -0800 11/15/03, David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:16:03PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >> Provided that we
> > > 2. replace the date with a convenient sequence number,
> > >which we can call the minor version nu
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
> Here is the stack backtrace:
>
Thanks, this is known and is actually safe. We're pursuing ways to quiet
these warnings.
> lock order reversal
> 1st 0xc1da318c vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323
> 2nd 0xc0724900 swap_pager swh
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Florian C. Smeets wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > If I build attached kmod and kldload/-unload it on a GENERIC kernel w/
> > SMP & apic it'll error out:
> > "Zone was not empty (xx items). Lost X pages of memory."
> >
> > This is on a p4 HTT, but seems reproducible on "proper"
On 27 Nov 2003, Christian Laursen wrote:
> Since upgrading from 5.1-RELEASE to 5.2-BETA, I've been
> experiencing hard lockups once or twice every day.
>
> I managed to get a trace by enabling the watchdog, which
> put me into the debugger. This is the trace:
>
> db> trace
> Debugger(c06f85ec,1b
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
> GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xff00eebfaca0
> ad0: 35772MB [72680/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
> GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xff00eebfa4a0
> ad4: 35304MB [71730/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA133
> GEOM: create
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote:
>Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels:
>
> # /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 2>&1' > /dev/null
>Real UserSys
>UP kernel 38m33.29s 27m10.09s 10m59.15
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Paulius Bulotas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when building kernel:
> ../../../vm/uma_core.c: In function `zone_timeout':
> ../../../vm/uma_core.c:345: error: `mp_maxid' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
> and so on.
>
> Anything I missed?
I just fixed this, sorry.
>
> Pauliu
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait.
I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better
than what I was able to garner. I was on
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the
feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it
alone, or it will be set at install time and then not t
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait.
I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better
than what I was able to garner. I was on
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Hi Vladimir,
I checked in a fix for this at revision 207742. If you can verify that it
works for you it would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Jeff
uests for tunefs.
Thanks,
Jeff
Applied and restarted portupgrade.
Will tell you tomorrow.
Fabien
Le 6 mai 2010 ? 00:54, Jeff Roberson a ?crit :
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
It seems related to S
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein :
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order re
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy :
On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order reversal:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:45:28 + (UTC)
From: Jeff Roberson
To: src-committ...@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org,
svn-src-h...@freebsd.org
Subject: svn commit: r208241 - head/sbin/tunefs
Author: jeff
Date: Tue May 18 01:45:28 2010
New Revision: 208241
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Hi,
I've been using -CURRENT last update in February for quite a long time
and few weeks ago decided to finally update it. The update was quite
unfortunate as system became very unstable: it just hangs few times a
day and panics sometimes.
Some thi
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 12/05/2010 kl. 22.44 skrev Jeff Roberson:
I think Peter Holm also saw this once while we were testing SUJ and reproduced
~30 second hangs with stock sources. At this point we need to brainstorm ideas
for adding debugging instrumentation and
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Hi,
I've been using -CURRENT last update in February for quite a long time
and few weeks ago decided to finally update it. The update was quite
unfortunate as system b
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, John Doe wrote:
Boot into single user-mode
# tunefs -j enable /
# tunefs -j enable /usr
# tunefs -j enable /tmp
# tunefs -j enable /var
# reboot
The machine then panics.
Looks like the machine is trying to write to a read-only filesystem.
Can you please give me informati
I've trimmed to the relavent part of the stack.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> #11 0xc0232072 in bwrite (bp=0xce5313e0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:795
> #12 0xc0232a7c in bawrite (bp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:1138
> #13 0xc023a02b in cluster_wbuild (vp=0xc4a21124, size=
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-03-12, Jeff Roberson écrivait :
>
> > Can you please print bp? I'd like to know what all of the members are. A
> > cluster buf should NEVER have BX_BKGRDWRITE set. This is totally bogus.
>
> (kgdb) fr
> #11 0xc
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Big file like OOo_1.0.2_source.tar.bz2 became broken with making
> openoffice in my environment.
How much memory is in your machine? Can you go back to an earlier date
and see if this is still a problem? Are you doing anything else wi
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>
> > Big file like OOo_1.0.2_source.tar.bz2 became broken with making
> > openoffice in my environment.
>
> How much memory is in your machine? Can you go back to an e
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
