Yes, it definitely seems ASUS related... I dropped back to uni processor
ASUS boards, and it's fine. didn't need the SMP anyway, just wanted to
play with it some more.
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> > > :> I/O, and then clo
On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Or worse, on a file server where you lose a low-numbered disk, not
> only does that one go away, but everything higher numbered loses as
> well. This "feature" does nothing other than introduce a gratuitous
Amen to this. If the default kernel or
19991204:
The dc interface has replaced al, ax, dm, pn and mx. The former
have been removed.
I believe former should be latter.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Wasn't there just a big to-do wrt to 4.0 (then -current), about the right
way to do things is to install a new kernel, then build the world?
I seem to remember Rod championing this method. (Had something to do with
some syscall interface changing).
On Sat, 27 May 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In
I get it on my newsserver pretty much every night when expire runs.
12 IDE drives on 3 Promise controllers.
I was just actually about to replace the MB, thinking it was just
something freaky or unstable.
I will try the patch.
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I'm looking for t
I love it. Haven't tried it, but the concept is great, and on the
assumption it works, will make things even easier...
Keep 'em coming. :)
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> With this commit, I'm trialling a simple method for providing tuning
> hints for otherwise statically-set para
It would be kind of cool if when managing a remote system if /kernel
failed to boot, then on the next boot, the loader will fire up
/kernel.old, or a /kernel.somethingorother.
Sort of a kernel-clean flag. Then 300 miles away, I can try stuff, and
have at least some assurance that I'll eventuall
The readme in /usr/share/examples hasn't been updated in a while...
WHat tag should I be using now to track 3.0-current/3.1? (Not the 4.x
branch).
Right now, I have tag=., and I can't get a compilable kernel to save my
life, problems in syscons.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd
Consider this interest.
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I'm polishing up the "JAIL" code I wrote and readying it for -current.
>
> This code provides an optional strenthening of the chroot() jail
> as we know it, and will provide safe sandboxes for most practical
> uses.
>
>
mergemaster is your friend.
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Jay Nelson wrote:
> I may have missed this earlier in the thread, but has anyone given any
> consideration to upgrade installs? If an upgrade doesn't plant the new
> default files in /etc/default[s] after an upgrade, we now have two
> places and t
THis is repeatable for me at will.
5.0-current, supped as of 2/1.
4 80GIG maxtors on 2 promise IDE ultra 66 cards, exported via NFS.
newfs'd an 80G FS on each drive, created one big file filled with
zero's from /dev/zero on each drive. (Softupdates/UFS1)
login to my other box, which has the
I have a "Dazzle" CF/PCMCIA adapter, which I use to flash CF cards
for some embedded devices.
The notebook I use it on is a Fujistu lifebook P2120.
With FreeBSD 4.8, I can dd to/from the CF card with this reader just fine.
It has nary a problem.
With any version of 5.x, I have a variety of pro
Interesting, I was considering trying this with a new UUNET connection
with gated, but they're sending me 69,000+ routes. Glad I didn't try it
yet. :)
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> I am currently using a couple of FreeBSD boxes for my border routers, and
> it seems that the globa
I agree, this would be way cool, and a valuable feature.
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Sebastien GIORIA wrote:
> Any chance to have jail include in the 3.x-STABLE before
> the summer ?
>
> Thanks
>
> S.
>
> --
> --> Backbone Scoliosis <--
> Sebastien Gioria - FranceNet
14 matches
Mail list logo
