I've added an option to touch(1) - details here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260871
It adds "-R", which is like "-r", but in the case of a link, refers to
the link itself.
I'm not sure what the protocol is regarding adding "non-standard"
options to standard commands, so ple
Ed Maste wrote:
> Since 2014 we have a copy of dma in the base system available as an
> optional component, enabled via the WITH_DMAGENT src.conf knob.
I thought it was enabled at default!
> I am interested in determining whether dma is a viable minimal base
> system MTA, and if not what gaps r
Cy Schubert wrote:
> dma doesn't support SMTP submission, we may need to review various port
> default options or whether ports even support it.
Good catch.
Would a suitable workaround be to parse the dma.conf file for the SMARTHOST
address, and then set up a simple tcp proxy on the local subm
Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <202202061553.216fr0yt071...@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>,
> Jamie La
> ndeg-Jones writes:
> > Cy Schubert wrote:
> >
> > > dma doesn't support SMTP submission, we may need to review various port
> > > default options or whether ports even support it.
> >
> > G
> It was a let's consider all the gotchas before diving in with both feet.
*shrug*
And all I did was suggest one way to deal with it. I didn't disagree with
your analysis. I don't understand the hostility.
> For me personally, maintainer of nmh and heirloom-mailx, I will enable the
> dma build
grarpamp wrote:
> Yes, some USB hw is very flaky,
> but ZFS can work great on these...
For what it's worth, I have had for 2.5 years, tracking stable, a NAS hanging
off a single NUC usb port, with 14 hard disks, 12 of which are used for 2 ZFS,
spools, of two 3X2 mirror spools.
Albeit, I'm using
Warner Losh wrote:
> since we already add stuff to what's printed for the priority. We could say
> <3,seconds-since-boot.fracsec> instead of just <3> and hack dmesg
> to print the right thing.
Isn't that what kern.msgbuf_show_timestamp does already?
I use that, along with this script:
17:15 (4
I've noticed that ps(1) (even with '-ww') is truncating output if it
exceeds a cerain length.
Further investigation shows that this is due to the libxo module.
The ps(1) man page implies there will be no truncation if "-ww" is used.
Is this a manpage issue, or a libxo issue, or a ps issue in the
Sami Halabi wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for your response.
>
> Would someone from the foundation step in and put it in GSOC ideas?
>
> kirk@ - would it be possible for you to do it ? :)
>
How would you handle file modifications? Backup every original too, or
just deal with literal deletions?
If you ar
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 7/8/22 05:40, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> > Dear Hans Petter Selasky,
> >
> > Why do you say FreeBSD license is a killer?
>
> Because you can do anything you want with the operating system :-)
"is a killer" could easily have been taken as a negative!
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> I like the idea of having something like tmpfiles.d, it would also help port
> maintainers (could also be done as a port).
I use tmpfs for /var/run and already have such a script for this very reason
(although not clamav)
I would have thought each port startup script sh
Kyle Evans wrote:
> It might be that the better long-term approach is to teach updatedb.sh
> how to drop privileges and push that out of the periodic script to avoid
> surprises like this from the different execution environments. This
> /feels/ like the kind of thing we could take an opinion
Kyle Evans wrote:
> Yes, my proposal is that it stops doing that and we teach updatedb to
> handle the priv-dropping instead, so that you get the same behavior no
> matter how you execute it.
Ahhh OK, I get you now. sorry, I musunderstood, I thought you meant the
current "periodic" method runs
Kyle Evans wrote:
> This is the problem I have with mailing lists; 2/3 responses didn't go
> back and read the critical bit of context to my stance (but at least you
> still included it in your quote, the other one trimmed it entirely):
I quoted the part I was referring to. I trimmed the rest,
Kyle Evans wrote:
> On 9/29/23 15:37, Kyle Evans wrote:
> > On 9/29/23 13:25, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> >> Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>> Brilliant! Thanks for the quick response and fix. It works fine for me -
> >>> I've not m
Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> I've been running with these two patches since you posted them. I notice
> that they haven't been commited, and the bug reported in the thread still
> exists in current, so I'm replying to the original thread, both in the hope
> that this sp
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
