On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Okay, I did some testing on my new scratch box by first installing 3.4
> from the CD and then attempting a source upgrade to 4.0: buildworld
> completed fine, but following the directions in UPDATING was not enough to
> get the kernel built.
>
> 1) gen
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> oN tUE, mAR 07, 2000 AT 05:05:40PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 01:02:29AM +1000, Idea Receiver wrote:
> > [...]
> > > btw, I have problem to make release, it kept complain about that i didnt
&g
hi,
I was tring to make release (just for interests) yesterday. Which
I receive an error "ln: /R/stage/kernels/GENERIC: No such file or
directory" in release.3. I go back to check Makefile, I see "_R"
been defined as "/R". Which looks doesnt make any sence, I do not
believe the / would be touche
hi,
Finallly I got make release work :^) thx to everyone who helping me about.
After make release, I believe nothing about X has been add into. I am just
woundring about how do I make a release which is just the same as those
SNAP released on the net? So I can use it to burn a CD, and use it to
Just some error I got when I try to make release this afternoon.
(cvs up to the latest). Maybe it is worthful to anyone making
release all the time :_)
##
a - textlist.o
a - parsetag.o
ranlib libindep.a
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I. -o mktable mktable.o hash.o
-L/usr/local/lib -
just cvsup up 3 hrs ago.
try to make world, following error been given..
cc -O -pipe
-I/mnt/ad5s1e/FreeBSD-CURRENT/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common
-I/mnt/ad5s1e/FreeBSD-CURRENT/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib
-I/mnt/ad5s
1e/FreeBSD-CURRENT/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../.. -
"make all" success without any problem.
however, make install fail ;(
following are the error msg.
anyway I can fix this problem?
thx~
##
xf86vmode.c: In function `ProcXF86VidModeGetMonitor':
xf86vmode.c:1320: Unable to generate reloads for:
(insn 298 296 300 (parallel[
(set (reg
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> Idea Receiver wrote:
> >
> > "make all" success without any problem.
> > however, make install fail ;(
> >
> > following are the error msg.
>
> [snip]
>
> > xf86vmode.c: In function `P
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> >>>>> Idea Receiver writes:
>
> > "make all" success without any problem.
>
> There was an error but "make all" always complete.
>
> > however, make install fail ;(
>
> Wha
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Matthew Thyer wrote:
> I had no problem.
>
> I tend to uninstall anything that uses X, build & install new X and
> then build new apps. It doesnt take that long. This is all using
> ports with CFLAG= -O -pipe
ok.. I just tried to reinstall the whole system with the SNAP
tried. same problem.
what else I can do?
btw, is there any different between binary version and make from port?
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> >>>>> Idea Receiver writes:
>
> > ok.. I just tried to reinstall the whole system with the SNAP fr
Finally! IT WORKS!
:-)
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, ANAZAWA Akio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>> at Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:41:53 +1000 (EST),
> >>>>> Idea Receiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Thierry.herbelot wrote:
> Marc van Kempen wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While trying to boot from the 4.0 installation disks,
> > I get the following error after the devices have been probed:
> >
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > root@localhost:/usr/src/sys/compile/SCHOPENHAUER
> > Ti
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Marc van Kempen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 01:55:11AM +1000, Idea Receiver wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Thierry.herbelot wrote:
> >
> > > Marc van Kempen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> >
I take a look at the XFree86-4 patches.
I found in those patches, "zh_TW.big5" and "zh_CN.big5" maybe wrong.
the "zh_TW.big5" should be "zh_TW.BIG5"
and the "zh_CN.big5" should be "zhTW.BIG5"
hopefuly I am right about this..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Idea Receiver wrote:
>
> I take a look at the XFree86-4 patches.
> I found in those patches, "zh_TW.big5" and "zh_CN.big5" maybe wrong.
>
> the "zh_TW.big5" should be "zh_TW
cvsup to 6 hours ago.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
mp_lock = 0102; cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc021ad98
stack pointer = 0x10:0xc87d0d88
fr
My mail server was down for pass few days. Hope I didnt miss anything
important!
Today, I try to make world and then rebuild the kernel.
After I restart the machine, it shows "Old-style KLD file linuxelf found"
and "Old-style KLD file linuxaout found" and then core dumped.
I tried to brandelf.
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> Donn Miller wrote:
> >
> > Idea Receiver wrote:
> > >
> > > My mail server was down for pass few days. Hope I didnt miss anything
> > > important!
> > >
> > > Today, I try to make world and th
my SBLive just wont play any mp3.
it just simplye stop immediantly. It was ok before my recent make world.
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> The recent commits to PCM, as of a few days back, have given me
> problems with my ESS 1868. When I play MP3's with mpg123, I get a lot
> of lou
i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current.
however, when i try to build the kernel, it failed as following
message.
please help! thanks in advance
===> oldcard
cc -O -pipe -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Idea
>Receiver writes:
> : i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current.
> : however, when i try to build the kernel, it failed as following
> : message.
>
> Upgrade your sources
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wro
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wrot
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wro
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wro
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have wrot
> >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >0x28121637 in _fd_lock_backout () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
>
> You're not running -current if you're using libc_r.so.4.
> We're at libc_r.so.5. And fd locks have also been disabled
> in -current.
>
err~~ sorry about my stupid.
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Idea
>Receiver writes:
> : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Idea Receiver writes:
> : > : i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current.
> : > : however, when i try to b
I just upgrade one of my server to -current. that server connect to ADSL
and act as a gateway.
however, after I upgrade that server to -current, all other clients
(all windows 98) start acting really strange. clients was unable to
connect to more then 60% of web sites. for example, clients can
at 11:08:28PM +1000, Idea Receiver wrote:
> >
> > I just upgrade one of my server to -current. that server connect to ADSL
> > and act as a gateway.
> >
> > however, after I upgrade that server to -current, all other clients
> > (all windows 98) start acting real
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Josh Tiefenbach wrote:
> Interestingly enough, I've been having the same problem with PPPoE ever since
> it hit the tree 'bout a year ago. It happens infrequently enough that I tend
> to blame my provider, rather than ppp.
>
> When it happens, killing ppp and restarting it
my last working make world is about 2 weeks ago (i believe it is 28/10).
i receiver the following error msg after today's make world:
link_elf: symbol makebdev undefined
pid 221 (ldconfig), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
I think i read some thing about this from the mailing list n
One of my current machines here are running PPPoE..
for some reason, it will some times become extramly lag of its PPPoE
connection. (for example, from 25ns ping time become 2500ns ping
time). And will back to normal in few mins..
However, i do not see the same problem on my 4.2 stable system.
i
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> how 'current' are your systems?
> when did this behaviour start?
> (i.e. before or after the latest round of netgraph changes?)
it is before new netgraph...
i think the new netgraph cause the same problem as well..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Idea Receiver wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > how 'current' are your systems?
> > > when did this behaviour start?
> > > (i.e. before or after the latest r
36 matches
Mail list logo
