On 03/01/15 05:33, Sulev-Madis Silber (ketas) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> First, I would be happy to have JSON and XML output about
> filesystems, users, routes... but I don't like how it makes code of
> df, w, netstat hard to read/maintain and often broken.
>
> I don't think it would be good to contin
w and I'll drop it. I'm
trying to understand the use case for this.)
--- Harrison
On 03/01/15 10:31, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Harrison Grundy <
> harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> If someone could summar
On 03/01/15 11:11, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Harrison Grundy
> wrote:
>>
>> That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning
>> behind putting into base, over a port or package, since
>> processing XML in base is a pain, an
On 03/01/15 13:25, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy <
> harrison.gru...@astrodoggroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
>> putting into base
On 03/02/15 01:23, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2015, at 21:29, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:11, David Chisnall
>> wrote:
>>> How would it be in a port? It involves modifying core
>>> utilities (some of which, like ifconfig, rely on kernel APIs
>>> that change between rele
On 03/02/15 11:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 3/2/15 5:27 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/15 4:14 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> On 3/1/15 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> That does seem use
