5.0-RC2 informal PR: X hangups using radeon driver

2003-01-01 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I downloaded a 5.0-RC2 ISO, checked the MD5 against a different mirror's MD5, burned a CD, diff'ed the CD against the ISO, and installed the OS. My first try using the full-GUI X installer failed gracefully (I forget the details). The other two X installers didn't offer to support my video card, s

5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay

2003-01-01 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I've got sendmail configured exactly the same (AFAIK) as my working 4.7 system, with rc.conf having sendmail_enable="NO" (only) just to allow me to send mail via my ISP using the "smart host" feature. My PROBLEM: Using either "gnus" or "mail", sent messages sit in /var/spool/clientmqueue for about

[resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-03 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
(cc'd to -questions, where I first post my problem, with no luck) Valentin Nechayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I fix it with: > define(`confDIRECT_SUBMISSION_MODIFIERS',`CC u')dnl > For now I has no such problem at my home machine. > Yes, this solution isn't intuitive. Thanks. I tried that a

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-03 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The book is pretty useless. The reason the fix you are using > works is because you have an IPv6 connection by default, and by > explicitly specifying an IPv4 address, IPv4 is used. > > The issue here is the .in-addr.arpa. delegation for localhost > is

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
[Dang; I meant to move this thread to -questions only, not -current.] Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ There is a genuine FreeBSD bug or two at the root of your problem ] > > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > > > BTW, I was suprised to find several

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > swear> BTW, I was suprised to find several help files only under /usr/src > swear> and the Sendmail Installation and Operation only under that and not > swear> yet built from the source "op.me". (PR worthy?) > > op.me is built and installed in /

5.0-CURRENT + Xfree86(radeon) blackout/hang

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I previously reported the same symptoms which occurred (repeatably) a few minutes after booting and starting X after a fresh -RC2 install from ISO. The problem seemed to have gone away after rebuilding the OS after cvsuping -CURRENT on 30'dec. But... I just got it again (once) after being "up" s

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: [...] > From my personal experience, DSL and cable modems are also transient > connections. 8-(. I've had real good service from both (in a hardware sense -- but at every "change of sta

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's ugly, but try adding: > > 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1 localhost > localhost.localdomain That actually "fixed" it, but maybe for the wrong reason. I restarted my sendmail daemons for no good reason after changin

5.0-RC2 won't install (zf_read & vm_fault) while 4.7 will

2003-01-10 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I got an old P100 I'm preparing for NAT duty at a Linux meeting and I tried to install 5.0-RC2 on it. Near end of mfsroot.flp loading I get: zf_read: unexpected EOF but it continues booting. Just after normal msgs about fd0 & ppc, it starts spewing unending messages so fast I can't read the

Re: 5.0-RC2/if_awi.ko doesn't load

2003-01-13 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:33:47 + (UTC), > Nicolas Christin wrote: > > I just tried to give a shot to 5.0-RC2 on an old box of mine that can > > only perform network installs (no CD drive). During the boot process, a > > module failed to load. > > > > D

Re: 5.0-RC2 won't install (zf_read & vm_fault) while 4.7 will

2003-01-13 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Joel Baldwin wrote: > --On Friday, January 10, 2003 5:36 PM -0800 "Gary W. Swearingen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I got an old P100 I'm preparing for NAT duty at a Linux meeting and > > I > tried to install 5.0-RC2 on it. Near end of mfsroot.fl