FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #31 r214621M
Nov 1 15:09:40 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
Nov 1 15:10:10 d130 last message repeated 3 times
Nov 1 15:10:50 d130 last message repeated 4 times
...
Nov 1 15:11:00 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
Nov 1 15:11:10 d13
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:40:54AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > I have the switch on this laptop in position to disable the wireless
> > > device (iwn(4)). Is there some way wpa_supplicant (or something) might
> > > be able to recognize that this is a pointless exercise?
> >
> > We
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 06:30:10PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> Thanks. I had quick look into that and I currently do not see an easy
> way to address that issue, as in tell wpa_supplicant about the device's
> state. This might change though once a newer wpa_supplicant has been
> importe
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:27:02AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> ...
> There is ieee80211_notify_radio(), granted iwn(4) misses the calls.. that
> function is supposed to notify upper layers about the radio state (0 = off, 1
> = on). Anyways, once wpa_supplicant import/update is done, I'll pro
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> Hello, people!
> After the upgrade to FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT svn revision 214735 does not
> build world: ...
>
I had no problem going from FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #33 r214732 to r214777.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 05:15:43PM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> ...
> Do you use when building make option -j?
>
> I'm using -j 3
I used -j 4.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:40:45AM -0600, eculp wrote:
> I build world several times a week on this machine:
> 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #126: Mon Nov 8 07:22:49 CST 2010
>
> Since the above build I have not been able to get past gnu.
>
> Today it broke at gdb :
> ...
> Stop in /usr/src/gn
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, December 20, 2010 4:38:57 pm Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > ?? Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:02:46 -0500
> > John Baldwin ??:
> >
> > Not working :(
>
> This was debugging, not a fix. Try this possible fix:
>
> Index: atkbdc_is
As usual, I have been tracking, building, & booting head daily on my
laptop for a while.
Yesterday, having built head at r217090, I had updated to r217145,
built, and booted it OK. (I then booted from my stable/8 slice for the
rest of the day, as usual.)
This morning, I updated to r217189, but o
Running -CURRENT with sources updated between 0347 - 0356 hrs. PDT
(US/Pacific -- 7 hrs. west of GMT at this time of year) yesterday;
in the process of building today's -CURRENT. (Had a similar-looking
problem yesterday, but I got involved in some other things, and didn't
make the time to report i
My SMP (2x886 MHz PIII) "build" machine has a RealTek 8129 NIC; I generally
track -CURRENT (on slice 4) on a daily basis. Until yesterday (08 Sep,
as I write this), it had worked adequately for my purposes.
After the build & reboot yesterday (and again today), the NIC does not
seem to have been p
Got today's (CVSup between 03:47 - 03:55 US/Pacific, 7 hrs. W of GMT)
-CURRENT built on the laptop (i5000e) without incident -- after having
built from similarly-updated source on my build machine without
incident.
On reboot, saw (hand-transcribed, so there may be transcription errors):
...
Start
>Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20
>Your backtrace shows that your acpi_tz_
This is on my (SMP) "build" machine; sources updated between 0347 - 0355
hrs. US/Pacific (7 hrs. W of GMT).
I had done the usual buildworld, kernel, installworld, mergemaster,
rebooted, ran "healthd -d" for a little while (enough to see some
plausible variation), then entered
sudo boot0c
>Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:58:12 -0500
>From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: dhclient/ipfw conflict on boot
>I just ran into this today after upgrading. It seems that dhclient is
>unable to initialize properly at boot time, due to the prior initializati
OK; now that I finally(!) got a version of -CURRENT built and running
in multi-user mode, I'll try to help identify a problem I've observed
since September, when Bill Paul committed src/sys/pci/if_rl.c rev.
1.119. And to the extent I'm able, I'd like to help with a solution. :-}
The machine in q
>Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:11:00 -0700 (MST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Help getting Realtek 8129-based NIC recognized?
>From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Have you tried re?
It's in the kernel config, yes:
device rl # RealTek 8129/
OK; I managed to build yesterday's -CURRENT (I update my local FreeBSD
CVS repository mirror from 0347 - 0354 hrs. US/Pacific, daily) on my
SMP "build" machine, and the resulting system appeared fairly normal:
it booted to multi-user mode, and I could login via the serial console.
(I wasn't expecti
Perhaps it's unrealistic to expect this to work, but on each of the
machines where I run -CURRENT, I also run -STABLE (on other slices),
but I generally only build ports under -STABLE, and /usr/local is
common to both the -CURRENT and -STABLE environments. (I build -CURRENT
with "COMPAT4X= yes" sp
>Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:34:08 +0600 (NOVT)
>From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, imagine, i'm accidentally deleted /bin with your most wanted
>static sh... And, of course, due to static nature of /bin/sh it was
>removed from /rescue? Nothing will protect you from shooting i
f those *now* doesn't mean that I necessarily know what the
other was *then*.
(And yes, this is more of a concern when investigating such things as
dropped (but logged) ICMP redirects targeted at some of our perimeter
hosts, for example. I'm rather less concerned within our internal nets.)
new,
>why isn't a router using OSPF installed with FreeBSD?
Sorry; that's in the realms of psychology, sociology, and/or
metaphysics, and as such, is outside any areas where I'm qualified to
comment. :-)
Cheers,
david
--
David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator
d...@
ntax for usernames.
What's the problem you're trying to solve?
Cheers,
david
--
David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator
d...@whistle.comvoice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
During transition to multi-user mode on first reboot after upgrading
from r207812 -> r207844; from the sserial console:
3 Select option, [Enter] for default 3
3 or [Space] to pause timer 0 3
@DY
GDB: no debug ports present
KDB: debugger
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:22:43PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> ...
> You don't happen to have a backtrace?
Oops -- sorry; got caught up in getting ready to head in to work:
db> bt
Tracing pid 20 tid 100067 td 0xc5a19000
_mtx_lock_flags(58,0,c0cd2d5b,570,80,...) at _mtx_lock_flags+0x46
flowtable_f
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 02:32:14PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> Could you please try with 207902?
> ...
First, thanks for the response.
OK; I grabbed r207902 & applied it (via "patch -p1"), then rebuilt the
kernel & rebooted; here's the panic now:
3 Select option, [Enter] for default 3
3 or [
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:52:07PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:39:11PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> > Are you not able to dump core?
> >
>
> Here's the crash summary; I can put the dump on my Web server on request.
> (It weighs in
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 02:32:14PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> Could you please try with 207902?
> ...
I saved that environment (documented elsewhere ini the thread), then
performed the normal (for me) daily update, this time, to r207911.
Again, I see a panic during transition from single-user mode t
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:30:09PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> Please try 207949
> ...
The panic (this time) didn't show up until about 10 seconds after the
login: prompt showed up on the serial console. Here's what it looks
like:
...
3 Select option, [Enter] for default 3
3 or [Space]
Well, one one of my machines -- I realize that there are some
machines for which it's been problematic for a while. And all of
the machines I'm using run FreeBSD/i386.
But it had been working on my build machine since I acquired it (a few
months ago) in daily use.
Of course, I didn't notice the
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:37:36AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 7:40:11 am David Wolfskill wrote:
> > Well, one one of my machines -- I realize that there are some
> > machines for which it's been problematic for a while. And all of
> > the mach
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:10:57PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> ...
> what do you see when you type boot0cfg -v ...?
> gpart show?
> then try
> gpart set -a active -i n aacd0
> n will probably be 5.
>
> bottom line, the MBR is NOT being updated by boot0cfg
OK; here's what I see -- note t
This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources
updated to r210495:
>>> World build started on Mon Jul 26 05:12:42 PDT 2010
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
>>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the o
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 07/26/10 09:55, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > This is for GENERIC i386 kernel, running on head at r210462, sources
> > updated to r210495:
> [ .. ]
>
> > ===> usr.bin/kdump (depend)
> > sh /usr
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 08:35:30AM -0700, gahn wrote:
> hi all:
>
> is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space?
Certainly; case in point:
localhost(9.0-C)[4] uname -v
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #71 r210558M: Wed Jul 28 07:46:04 PDT 2010
r...@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY
loc
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:23:37PM +, Benjamin Stuppin wrote:
> ...
> when using tmpfs for /tmp i'd probably add the "mode=1777" option, else you
> would mount /tmp with default options and without the sticky bit which could
> cause some problems.
I have never needed to do that.
d254(9.0-C
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:12:50AM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> ...
> > Symptom is that I get a panic on insert (or kernel probe, if it's
> > inserted already at boot time) of a PCcard NIC.
>
>
> VIMAGE kernels
Oh -- right. I fogot that I had configured this kernel for VIMAGE so
Julian to demo som
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:12:50AM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
>
> VIMAGE kernels do not properly set curvnet context when dynamically attaching
> devices (such as USB or pccard NICs), that's why the dereferencing V_if_index
> fails. You can use the "show pcpu" and "show vnets" DDB commands to
Before I get to the "good stuff", I'll note that:
* I'm no longer running a VIMAGE kernel, so that possible source of
confusion should be absent.
* The hardware in question (a miniPCI device in my laptop) has been
working under stable/7 and stable/8 (so I believe that there should be
nothin
>Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:47:18 -0800
>From: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:14:26PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> > I've been seeing this for a couple of weeks since I updated my laptop to
>> > CURRENT. I do a normal shutdown (-p or -r) and reboot. The shutdown
Been tracking -CURENT (& -STABLE, though that is of marginal relevance
to this) on a daily basis for a couple of years now. Gone fairly well,
usually; sometimes there's turbulence. I suspect this is just a bump,
though -- and it's the first one I've encountered in at least a couple
of weeeks.
So
>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:46:39 -0800 (PST)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Yes, I'm responding to my own post]
>Got -CURRENT (re-)built; booted, logged in, poked around, seemed OK;
>issued:
> sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p
>
>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:34:31 -0800 (PST)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:46:39 -0800 (PST)
>>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[Yes, I'm responding to my own post]
Again.
Well, I tried "
>Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:18 -0400
>From: "Will Saxon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I cvsupped the source this morning and I get:
>> [...]
>> ===> firewire/firewire
>> ...
>> In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/fwohci.c:72:
>> @/dev/firewire/fwdma.h:38: redefinition of `bus_dmasync_op_t
>From: "Roderick van Domburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:18:45 +0200
>Subject: Support DHCP in rc.firewall by default?
>Right now, rc.firewall isn't set up to support DHCP configurations although
>it could easily be done so.
More or less, depending on
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:42:22 -0400
>Subject: ACPI mailling list?
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[I will Cc: -current despite that request.]
>Is there an ACPI mailling list I can join
>to help debug/test ACPI?
See http://www.jp.f
Yeah, I know about kernel & world being out of sync; that ought not be
the case, as I just finished the usual buildworld, kernel, installworld,
mergemaster sequence. For further evidence:
g1-9(5.0-C)[1] uname -a && ls -lio `which ps` && file `which ps`
FreeBSD g1-9.catwhisker.org 5.0-CURRENT Fr
>Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:33:23 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Riccardo Torrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To avoid unwanted removal can we locate that file under any other
>place and point it (also by KERNCONF or some new black magic) with
>full path? Is this possible (or already done) ?
Well, what I do is pl
>Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:16:03 +0200
>From: Christopher Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>buildworld breaks with
>cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_MAJOR=5 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
>-I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6
>-I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSI
>usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/l
>Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:33:36 +0200
>From: Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Wed Jun 26 19:00:10 PDT 2002
>> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/bin/cvs: Shared object has no run-time symbol table
>I got this testing the RMEM_LIMIT patches, but it only crops up after
>about an hour of heavy por
After building today's -CURRENT successfully (CVSup started at 0347 hrs.
Pacific (7 hrs. west of GMT/UTC at this time of year) from cvsup14, with
the addition of Ruslan's updates to the src/share/mk/bsd.*.mk files),
I thought it might be of use to just let this SMP (2x866 PIII) box sit
in a "make
Thatis, after issuing
sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p
I see (on the serial console):
Additional TCP options:.
Starting background filesystem checks
Sat Jul 6 08:07:46 PDT 2002
FreeBSD/i386 (freebeast.catwhisker.org) (cuaa0)
login: Juboot() called on cpu#0
Waiting (max 60 seco
I got the word about the changes to vfs_subr.c & vfs_bio.c fixing
the "hang" at shutdown for yesterday's -CURRENT fairly late in the
day yesterday, and since the problem didn't seem (as far as I could
tell) to affect normal operation, I figured I'd just pick up the
change at the following update (
CVSup started at 0347 hrs. Pacfic Daylight (7 hrs. west of GMT/UTC)
from cvsup14.freebsd.org. Build/install/mergemaster was uneventful.
Reboot after mergemaster proceeded as if nothing strange was about
to happen, then (cut/pasted from serial console):
...
SMP: enabled INTs: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10
OK; implementing rev. 1.12 of src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c allowed me to
boot my (SMP) build machine & login:
freebeast(5.0-C)[1] uname -a
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Jul 8
16:28:30 PDT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBEAST i3
>Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>OK; implementing rev. 1.12 of src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c allowed me to
>boot my (SMP) build machine & login:
>freebeast(5.0-C)[1] uname -a
>FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CU
This is by no means critical; possibly not even "important" -- but
after using my SMP "build machine" to build today's -STBALE (on
slice 1) and today's -CURRENT (on slice 4) -- where "today" varies
per the calendar -- it is my usual practice to issue
sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p
OK; I built today's -CURRENT (running yesterday's, as usual) on my SMP
build machine without incident earlier today.
And, as usual, I'm trying the same thing with my (UP) laptop.
But this time, the sequence has come to a halt; here's what I see so far:
>>> stage 4: populating /usr/obj/usr/src/i
>Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 21:51:57 +0900
>From: Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>If you are having a trouble of a broken thread state (eg a thread with
>TDS_RUNQ on no run queue) or a mysterious page fault on a kernel
>memory (probably in mi_switch()), you may want to try my patch at:
>http://p
CVSup was at the usual time, 0347 hrs. US/Pacific. SMP build machine
built, installed, and rebooted just fine.
Trying to do likewise on my (UP) laptop got as far as the reboot, which
got a panic. I don't have a serial console on the laptop, so I'm hand-
transcribing this:
...
pcm0: pch[2].offs
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[Re: panic during probes at boot time for today's -CURRENT]
Well, absent any better ideas, I rebooted the laptop, but into
single-user mode. It came up just fine, so I did the &
I've been tracking each of -STABLE & -CURRENT for a while now, so
it's been almost a year since I tried the -STABLE -> -CURRENT upgrade
path. Still, I was a bit skeptical when someone on the #FreeBSD
channel at irc.sage-members.org indicated that the "make installworld"
was failing for him, typic
>Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:41:19 +0200
>From: Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>First off, sorry for the lot of snippage but this mail was really
>long...
Yeah, it was; sorry. That's what I get for trying to be complete. :-)
I was able to re-do the steps, and evtually get to a point:
fre
Warning: this is ~200 lines long. Sorry. I think the issue raised
is worth maybe 10% of the bandwidth, but
>Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:33:33 +0200
>From: Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Thanks for getting back with the results. This points to the fatc that
>the instructions in UPDATI
>>> stage 4: building libraries
...
cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_MAJOR=5 -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../.
./include -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -DINET6 -I/common/S4/obj/usr/src/lib/libc
-DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP
-DDES_BUILTIN -DYP -DHESIOD
>Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>The following patch (from /usr/src) gets past the problem, but I
>don't know that it's correct:
Still don't know about "correct," but it was incomplete.
>Index
Symptom:
===> sbin/ifconfig
cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -I..-c
/usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall
-Wmi
>Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
>From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
>> If I do a "make -jN world" build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
>> up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
>> the panic alw
[I tried to send this unicast to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the attempt was
rejected with an "reason: 550 5.7.1 Access denied" as the only excuse
given for the behavior. dhw]
Adding a "cleandepend" stanza similar to the just-added "cleandir"
stanza seems to get beyond that.
Cheers,
david
--
David
>From: "Mario Goebbels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:27:52 +0200
>H. Is mergemaster really necessary? I mean when upgrading from a fresh
>4.6 install?
Note that this is posted to the -current list, so the context *I* infer
from this is that you're re
OK; it's probably rather like a sledgehammer, but I got the kernel
to compile and run with the following patch:
Index: sys/net/if_ethersubr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/freebsd/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -u -
OK; after building today's -CURRENt on my build machine, I had time to
try building the kernel again, but with GEOM.
3 observations so far:
* Nearly everything still works. :-)
* A verbose boot (my default on the machine in question, since I
often need to check things or quote boot messages)
Saw Alfred's commit to un-break -CURRENT, did likewise locally,
built today's -CURRENT, and an attempted multi-user boot panics:
...
Starting nfsd.
Updating motd.
Starting ntpd.
Configuring syscons: blanktime.
Starting sshd.
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc02bea10(0xc406a000) 0.006791320
g_dev_
>Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Saw Alfred's commit to un-break -CURRENT, did likewise locally,
>built today's -CURRENT, and an attempted multi-user boot panics:
>
Today's -CURRENT did
>Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:48:33 +0800
>From: suken woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>xdm broken on current when login .
It isn't for me, and I've been tracking -CURRENT daily for some time.
>i knew this is the pam module
>problem,but how could i fix it?
Well, absent any clues as to why you think it
I'm including [EMAIL PROTECTED] because there may well be some
interaction with the recently-imported acpica-unix-20021002. Please
be judicious with respect to where replies are directed.
The panic occurred with -CURRENT CVSupped around 0347 hrs. US/Pacific (7
hrs. west of GMT, at this time of y
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:42:34AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:04:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > I've ended up hosing world with the Binutils upgrade.
>
> I think world is OK now.
Looks as if something is (still?) broken:
>>> stage 4: building everything..
...
This happened to me about a week ago under -STABLE, and again today
under -STABLE, so I tried it under -CURRENT today (in single-user
mode, to reduce variables), and was able to re-create it.
I *believe* that I had successfully inserted the drive after "atacontrol
detach 1" shortly after the atac
>Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:49:22 -0400 (EDT)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I *believe* that I had successfully inserted the drive after "atacontrol
>> detach 1" shortly after the atacontrol-related changes were MFCed.
>You probably want to do things in the following sequence:
>- at
Noticed a bunch of:
> Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0170e40(0xc274c000) 0.001114387
from running (yesterday's) -CURRENT, so I thought I'd check against
(yesterday's kernel.debug (before I replaced it with today's).
Per "nm -lan kernel.debug", I see:
c0170420 T an_attach/usr/src/sys/dev/
For various reasons (most of which are likely historical), I tend
to mount /tmp as a swap-backed memory file system (and allocate
quite a bit of space to swap). Thus, in -STABLE, I use an mfs; in
-CURRENT, I use a little shell script (cribbed almost verbatim from
"man mdconfig").
Some months back
OK; this is a bit strange, and I've come up with a circumvention (read
"really ugly bloody hack"), but my real concern is that this may be a
manifestation or symptom of something broken in some subtle way. The
note is rather long- winded; sorry about that, but I didn't see a better
way to do this.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:29:20PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> I've submitted a small patch (bin/45333) for both -stable
> and -current, but I haven't been able to test it under
> -current (due to lack of a spare machine). Would someone
> please give it a try and let me know if it compiles and
>
>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:18:03 -0800 (PST)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Yes, replying to my own message, if not myself dhw]
>Here's an excerpt of the typescript from the "make installworld":
>---%<- snip! --
>Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:06:40 +0100
>From: Stefan Farfeleder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> g1-9(5.0-C)[2] file /tmp/install.*|* | grep data
>^
>> #SC.SAVE~: Command not found.
>Are these just typoes in the mail or did you really type this? :-)
I cut & pasted it.
>Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:04:28 +0800
>From: Ying-Chieh Liao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 00:06:59 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
>> I'm in DP2, and cvsup and then make world...
>>
>> if [ -L /usr/share/examples/sunrpc ]; then rm -f /usr/share/examples/sunrpc; fi
>> if [ -L /usr
>From: David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:04:47 -0600
[Well, I'm Cc:ing -current anyway -- dhw]
>Out of curiosity, how much slower is a 5.x kernel compilation than a 4.x, on
>average? My 486, 66 MHz and 16 MB RAM, compiles a 4.x kernel in ab
>Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:20:38 -0800
>From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It's often more efficient to use binary installations/upgrades than
>source, on slow machines. For example, I build world on a fast
>machine, mount via NFS and then installworld on my slower machines.
Quite so -- no
>Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:01:43 -0600
>From: "Alan L. Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> kernel: recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vm page queue mutex @
>> ../../../i386/i386/pmap.c:928
>> $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/vm_map.c,v 1.273 2002/12/01 18:57:56 alc Exp $
>> $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/pmap
>Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:17:39 +0200
>From: Vallo Kallaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'm using both -current and -stable on the same machine, very
>common. Boot0cfg has -s [12345] flag to set the slice to boot on and
>it has been working so far. Beginning from Dec 1, I'm unable to set
>the slice:
>ro
Trying to "make buildworld" for today's -CURRENT, I get:
>>> stage 4: building libraries
--
...
===> doc
cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm -c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_file.c -o kvm_file.So
In file included from
>Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 21:56:47 -0800
>From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I've finally updated the ACPI CA codebase with Intel's 20020214 drop
Yay...!
>There aren't many changes in the FreeBSD-specific code, this is just
>catching up with major improvements in the interpreter.
>As usual, p
>From: "Michael D. Harnois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 26 Feb 2002 08:38:22 -0600
>I cvsuped and built world and kernel this morning, and the kernel hangs
>at atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0.
I didn't see that problem. Indeed, my (desktop) build machine built and
ran today's -CURRENT just f
>Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:52:38 + (GMT)
>From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>FWIW, now that Peter has temporarily backed out his pmap-related changes,
>-current has stabilized again. Those who were having trouble with panics
>on boot (or within a few minutes after) with kernels built
>Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:51:02 +0900
>From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sorry, I forgot to get kernel core for this (today's -current)...
>panic: Assertion td->td_proc->p_stat == SRUN || td->td_proc->p_stat == SZOMB ||
>td->td_proc->p_stat == SSTOP failed at ../../../kern/kern_mutex.c:1
>Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:47:09 +0900
>From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>At Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:17 + (UTC),
>John Baldwin wrote:
>> That's bad juju panic. :) Are you using witness? If so, did you get a printf
>> about sleeping with a lock held?
>I think I did not get lock warning
>From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:07:48 +0100
>/flat/src/libexec/lukemftpd/../../contrib/lukemftpd/src/extern.h:324: size of ar
>ray `remotehost' has non-integer type
>/flat/src/libexec/lukemftpd/../../contrib/lukemftpd/src/extern.h:327: syntax err
>or before
>Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 17:43:26 +0200
>From: Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>"Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:30:44 +0200 (EET), Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Maxim> Hi, Looks like source upgrade path is broken due to PAM. My
>> Maxim> system is -CUR
Is anyone else seeing this?
Running -CURRENT (been tracking it daily for a while, now), I find that
if I run script(1), things basically run as expected... until I try to
close script's stdin (normally, by entering EOT (^D)).
At that point, I can use the mouse (if I'm in an environment where tha
>Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:33:41 -0800
>From: Edwin Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Only my laptop didn't compile the kernel with this morning's cvsup. It stops
>with the following error.
>...
>-ffreestanding -include opt_global.h -fno-common -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundar
>y=2 -Werror /usr/src/sys
201 - 300 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
