erated by VOP_WHITEOUT().
It looks like reasonable and patch is simple and effective I guess.
If you unionfs guys or fs guys have some ideas around this patch,
please teach me.
After some tests and a couple of weeks after, I'll commit ed's patch
if there is no objections.
--
erated by VOP_WHITEOUT().
It looks like reasonable and patch is simple and effective I guess.
If you unionfs guys or fs guys have some ideas around this patch,
please teach me.
After some tests and a couple of weeks after, I'll commit ed's patch
if there is no objections.
-
.ongs.co.jp 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #6 r213257: Thu
Sep 30 10:30:06 JST 2010
r...@parancell.ongs.co.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PARANCELL amd64
%
My home directory on NFS server. Does anyone have any ideas?
--
Daichi GOTO
CEO | ONGS Inc.
81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http:/
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:05:12 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Daichi GOTO wrote:
> > It looks very strange. fcntl() always fails to delete lock file
> > and command.l_pid is always -6464. This issue is disclosed in
> > porting Google's Ja
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:19:45 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> issues that might be occurring with the software, as per my copy of
> >> SUSv4 (see the ERRORS section of fcntl). I would print out the
> >> strerror for that case.
> >> Providing a backtrace of the application's execution and the
>
/tmp | grep journal
flags soft-updates+journal
%
And working scene:
Windows 2:
% chmod u+w /tmp/lockfile
% ls -l /tmp/lockfile
-rwsr-x--- 1 daichi wheel 0 10月 5 15:22 /tmp/lockfile
% ./test_fcntl
My pid: 43646
test_fcntl: fcntl[1]: Resource temporarily unavailable
PID=43490 has the loc
stem will have a system ID of
> zero. <<< After a successful F_GETLK request, the value of l_whence is
> SEEK_SET.
>
> Thus, after fixing the test app I'm getting a sensical value:
--
Daichi GOTO
81-42-316-7945 | dai.
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> 2010/10/4 Daichi GOTO :
> > Thanks nice test tool :) And at last I got it excepting one mystery!
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:17:08 -0700
> > Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> Following through the same proc
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Daichi GOTO wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02 -0700
>> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> 2010/10/4 Daichi GOTO :
>>>> Thanks nice test tool :) And at last I got it excepting o
On Oct 5, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Daichi GOTO wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:23:02 -0700
>>
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:50 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:39:26 am Daichi GOTO wrote:
>> Next step discussion engaged from this research I guess.
>>
>> Should we do change FreeBSD's fcntl(2) to return correct l_pid
>&g
I am wondering if FreeBSD 10-CURRNET could use Mellanox
Technologies's ConnectX-3 VPI infiniband devices. Is
there anyone who are using ConnectX-3 VPI with FreeBSD?
--
Daichi GOTO (daichi)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To
e from LK_EXCLUSIVE to LK_SHARED
> in sys/kern/kern_exec.c, executables on union filesystems no
> longer cause a panic.
>
> ...keith
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Daichi GOTO (daichi)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
__
interlock) r = 0
> >> (0xc57cec28) locked @
> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/unionfs/../../fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c:1835
> >> shared lockmgr ufs (ufs) r = 0 (0xc57cec08) locked @
> >> /usr/src/sys/modules/unionfs/../../fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c:1843
> >
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:14:07 +0100
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 02:45, Daichi GOTO wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > From the DTrace tutorial at AsiaBSDCon 2012, it is a CDDL
> > license issue.
>
> Hi Daichi,
> I wonder which clause/aspect of the license is
new patches are always welcome. I'm considering
to get merged into current if there are no issues and problems.
--
Daichi GOTO
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, se
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:03:30 +0400
Alex Zimnitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:49 +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote:
>
> > It is adjustable with sysctl value 'vfs.unionfs.recursive_limit' as
> > multiple mounts limits. The default value is 1 and it means two-
Hi unionfs users ;)
We have developed new unionfs feature, "intermediate umount".
You can do like this:
# mount_unionfs /test2 /test1
# mount_unionfs /test3 /test1
# df
:/test2 x x x xx% /test1
:/test3 x x x xx% /test1
# umount ':/test2'
# df
:/test3
sts.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Daichi GOTO
CEO | ONGS Inc.
81-42-316-7945 | dai...@ongs.co.jp | http://www.ongs.co.jp
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/daichigoto
__
20 matches
Mail list logo
