On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Andrew Thompson"
>>
>> On 15 August 2010 13:55, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
>>> Our default grep should be significantly slower than the old grep
>>> because:
>>>
>>> I think that new grep which is tim
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2010/8/17 Mark Linimon :
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:21:07PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
>>> opensolaris is gone
>>
>> It appears there will be a fork, but that's not particularly crucial
>> to FreeBSD.
>>
>>> ZFS also gone.
>
> OpenSolaris is g
If I understand the build process correctly, it should be possible to
have both compilers in base for some (presumably short) period of
time... then just have which one you use be a configuration option,
which should give LLVM/clang some additional exposure, without the
obvious risks of a complete
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> > people are already experimenting with clang installed from ports,
>> > with gcc4.{3,4,5} from ports etc. by not importing clang we can
>> > maybe delay this a little but it's coming anyway.
>> I am pretty much fine and happy with people ex
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Astrodog wrote:
>> Personally, I pay very little attention to the prompt. That being said...
>> Plenty of people prefer widely different configurations for the prompt.
>> I think eve
... snip ...
> if ($?prompt) then
> # An interactive shell -- set some stuff up
> - set prompt = "`/bin/hostname -s`# "
> + set prompt = "[%n@%m]%c04%# "
> + set promptchars = "%#"
>
> Many people had alternative suggestions for the prompt. Can you please
> clarify why you
